Cargando…

Estimating incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes using prevalence data: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study

BACKGROUND: Incidence is one of the most important epidemiologic indices in surveillance. However, determining incidence is complex and requires time-consuming cohort studies or registries with date of diagnosis. Estimating incidence from prevalence using mathematical relationships may facilitate su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoyer, Annika, Brinks, Ralph, Tönnies, Thaddäus, Saydah, Sharon H., D’Agostino, Ralph B., Divers, Jasmin, Isom, Scott, Dabelea, Dana, Lawrence, Jean M., Mayer-Davis, Elizabeth J., Pihoker, Catherine, Dolan, Lawrence, Imperatore, Giuseppina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36788497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01862-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Incidence is one of the most important epidemiologic indices in surveillance. However, determining incidence is complex and requires time-consuming cohort studies or registries with date of diagnosis. Estimating incidence from prevalence using mathematical relationships may facilitate surveillance efforts. The aim of this study was to examine whether a partial differential equation (PDE) can be used to estimate diabetes incidence from prevalence in youth. METHODS: We used age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific estimates of prevalence in 2001 and 2009 as reported in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Using these data, a PDE was applied to estimate the average incidence rates of type 1 and type 2 diabetes for the period between 2001 and 2009. Estimates were compared to annual incidence rates observed in SEARCH. Precision of the estimates was evaluated using 95% bootstrap confidence intervals. RESULTS: Despite the long period between prevalence measures, the estimated average incidence rates mirror the average of the observed annual incidence rates. Absolute values of the age-standardized sex- and type-specific mean relative errors are below 8%. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of diabetes can be accurately estimated from prevalence. Since only cross-sectional prevalence data is required, employing this methodology in future studies may result in considerable cost savings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-023-01862-3.