Cargando…

A Study of 42 Partially Edentulous Patients with Single-Crown Restorations and Implants to Compare Bone Loss Between Crestal and Subcrestal Endosseous Implant Placement

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of dental implant placement at different bone levels upon the resultant postoperative peri-implant bone loss. MATERIAL/METHODS: Forty-two partially edentulous patients seeking implant-supported single-crown restorations were screened...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Shailesh, Mattoo, Khurshid, Khalid, Imran, Baig, Fawaz A.H., Kota, Mohammad Zahir, Ishfaq, Muhammad, Ibrahim, Mohammed, Hassan, Sahba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772790
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939225
_version_ 1784889032975581184
author Jain, Shailesh
Mattoo, Khurshid
Khalid, Imran
Baig, Fawaz A.H.
Kota, Mohammad Zahir
Ishfaq, Muhammad
Ibrahim, Mohammed
Hassan, Sahba
author_facet Jain, Shailesh
Mattoo, Khurshid
Khalid, Imran
Baig, Fawaz A.H.
Kota, Mohammad Zahir
Ishfaq, Muhammad
Ibrahim, Mohammed
Hassan, Sahba
author_sort Jain, Shailesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of dental implant placement at different bone levels upon the resultant postoperative peri-implant bone loss. MATERIAL/METHODS: Forty-two partially edentulous patients seeking implant-supported single-crown restorations were screened followed by segregation into 2 groups (GP), GP E (equicrestal) and GP S (subcrestal) (n=21 each). Sixty endosseous implants (30 each) (Adin Tourage-S, Israel), size 3.5/8 and 4/10 mm for mandible, were placed using a 2-stage surgical procedure. At 4 to 6 months, straight abutments were attached followed by restoration (Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany). Crestal bone levels (mesial/distal) of implant fixtures were assessed at 5 time intervals (after surgery, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months) using digital radiography. Means and standard deviations were calculated, following which the differences were statistically analyzed using ANOVA at P value of <0.05. RESULTS: The mean annual bone loss for GP S (1.96 mm) was higher than GP E (1.10 mm). At all studied time intervals, the bone loss for implants in GP S was higher than in GP E (P<0.05). Between time intervals, lowest bone loss was observed on the distal side in GP E (0.11 mm/6–9 month) and the highest bone loss was observed on the distal side of GP S (0.6 mm/9–12 month). Differences in the means between the 2 groups on mesial and distal sides were statistically significant at all time intervals (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Subcrestal implant placement was associated with more bone loss than when implants are placed at the crestal level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9930363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99303632023-02-16 A Study of 42 Partially Edentulous Patients with Single-Crown Restorations and Implants to Compare Bone Loss Between Crestal and Subcrestal Endosseous Implant Placement Jain, Shailesh Mattoo, Khurshid Khalid, Imran Baig, Fawaz A.H. Kota, Mohammad Zahir Ishfaq, Muhammad Ibrahim, Mohammed Hassan, Sahba Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of dental implant placement at different bone levels upon the resultant postoperative peri-implant bone loss. MATERIAL/METHODS: Forty-two partially edentulous patients seeking implant-supported single-crown restorations were screened followed by segregation into 2 groups (GP), GP E (equicrestal) and GP S (subcrestal) (n=21 each). Sixty endosseous implants (30 each) (Adin Tourage-S, Israel), size 3.5/8 and 4/10 mm for mandible, were placed using a 2-stage surgical procedure. At 4 to 6 months, straight abutments were attached followed by restoration (Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany). Crestal bone levels (mesial/distal) of implant fixtures were assessed at 5 time intervals (after surgery, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months) using digital radiography. Means and standard deviations were calculated, following which the differences were statistically analyzed using ANOVA at P value of <0.05. RESULTS: The mean annual bone loss for GP S (1.96 mm) was higher than GP E (1.10 mm). At all studied time intervals, the bone loss for implants in GP S was higher than in GP E (P<0.05). Between time intervals, lowest bone loss was observed on the distal side in GP E (0.11 mm/6–9 month) and the highest bone loss was observed on the distal side of GP S (0.6 mm/9–12 month). Differences in the means between the 2 groups on mesial and distal sides were statistically significant at all time intervals (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Subcrestal implant placement was associated with more bone loss than when implants are placed at the crestal level. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9930363/ /pubmed/36772790 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939225 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Jain, Shailesh
Mattoo, Khurshid
Khalid, Imran
Baig, Fawaz A.H.
Kota, Mohammad Zahir
Ishfaq, Muhammad
Ibrahim, Mohammed
Hassan, Sahba
A Study of 42 Partially Edentulous Patients with Single-Crown Restorations and Implants to Compare Bone Loss Between Crestal and Subcrestal Endosseous Implant Placement
title A Study of 42 Partially Edentulous Patients with Single-Crown Restorations and Implants to Compare Bone Loss Between Crestal and Subcrestal Endosseous Implant Placement
title_full A Study of 42 Partially Edentulous Patients with Single-Crown Restorations and Implants to Compare Bone Loss Between Crestal and Subcrestal Endosseous Implant Placement
title_fullStr A Study of 42 Partially Edentulous Patients with Single-Crown Restorations and Implants to Compare Bone Loss Between Crestal and Subcrestal Endosseous Implant Placement
title_full_unstemmed A Study of 42 Partially Edentulous Patients with Single-Crown Restorations and Implants to Compare Bone Loss Between Crestal and Subcrestal Endosseous Implant Placement
title_short A Study of 42 Partially Edentulous Patients with Single-Crown Restorations and Implants to Compare Bone Loss Between Crestal and Subcrestal Endosseous Implant Placement
title_sort study of 42 partially edentulous patients with single-crown restorations and implants to compare bone loss between crestal and subcrestal endosseous implant placement
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772790
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939225
work_keys_str_mv AT jainshailesh astudyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT mattookhurshid astudyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT khalidimran astudyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT baigfawazah astudyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT kotamohammadzahir astudyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT ishfaqmuhammad astudyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT ibrahimmohammed astudyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT hassansahba astudyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT jainshailesh studyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT mattookhurshid studyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT khalidimran studyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT baigfawazah studyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT kotamohammadzahir studyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT ishfaqmuhammad studyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT ibrahimmohammed studyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement
AT hassansahba studyof42partiallyedentulouspatientswithsinglecrownrestorationsandimplantstocomparebonelossbetweencrestalandsubcrestalendosseousimplantplacement