Cargando…

Renal Dynamic Image Compression using Singular Value Decomposition

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the compression of renal dynamic (RD) study images using singular value decomposition (SVD) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4600 images of fifty RD study were compressed by using SVD technique. Two Nuclear Medicine (NM) Physicians com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaudhary, Jagrati, Pandey, Anil Kumar, Sharma, Param Dev, Patel, Chetan, Kumar, Rakesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817198
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_59_22
_version_ 1784889053245603840
author Chaudhary, Jagrati
Pandey, Anil Kumar
Sharma, Param Dev
Patel, Chetan
Kumar, Rakesh
author_facet Chaudhary, Jagrati
Pandey, Anil Kumar
Sharma, Param Dev
Patel, Chetan
Kumar, Rakesh
author_sort Chaudhary, Jagrati
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the compression of renal dynamic (RD) study images using singular value decomposition (SVD) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4600 images of fifty RD study were compressed by using SVD technique. Two Nuclear Medicine (NM) Physicians compared compressed images with their corresponding input images and labeled these as acceptable or unacceptable. The SVD computation time and compression ratio were calculated for each image. The quality of compressed image was also assessed objectively using the following image quality metrics: Error, structural similarity (SSIM), Brightness, global contrast factor, contrast per pixel (CPP), and blur. The error in split function (i.e., the error between split function calculated from compressed image and split function calculated from original image) was computed for every RD study. Wilcoxon signed-rank test with continuity correction was applied to find a statistically significant difference in ROI counts on compressed and original image at. RESULTS: As per NM physicians compressed image frames look identical to the original image frames. Objectively the compressed images were brighter, less noisy, and also have better CPP. Based on the visual assessment, time activity curve generated from original and compressed image frames was identical. There was insignificant difference of ROI counts between the input and compressed image frames of 99m-Tc LLEC RD Study. There was no significant difference between the split renal function estimated from original and its compressed RD study. The average SSIM value, average compression ratio, and SVD computation time were found to be 0.7521, 1.475, and 0.1200. CONCLUSIONS: Visually, compressed image was identical to the original image. The percentage compression achieved was found to be up to 58% (compression factor achieved = 1.57). The SVD computation time was approximately 0.12 s for 64 × 64 matrix size image frame.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9930461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99304612023-02-16 Renal Dynamic Image Compression using Singular Value Decomposition Chaudhary, Jagrati Pandey, Anil Kumar Sharma, Param Dev Patel, Chetan Kumar, Rakesh Indian J Nucl Med Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the compression of renal dynamic (RD) study images using singular value decomposition (SVD) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4600 images of fifty RD study were compressed by using SVD technique. Two Nuclear Medicine (NM) Physicians compared compressed images with their corresponding input images and labeled these as acceptable or unacceptable. The SVD computation time and compression ratio were calculated for each image. The quality of compressed image was also assessed objectively using the following image quality metrics: Error, structural similarity (SSIM), Brightness, global contrast factor, contrast per pixel (CPP), and blur. The error in split function (i.e., the error between split function calculated from compressed image and split function calculated from original image) was computed for every RD study. Wilcoxon signed-rank test with continuity correction was applied to find a statistically significant difference in ROI counts on compressed and original image at. RESULTS: As per NM physicians compressed image frames look identical to the original image frames. Objectively the compressed images were brighter, less noisy, and also have better CPP. Based on the visual assessment, time activity curve generated from original and compressed image frames was identical. There was insignificant difference of ROI counts between the input and compressed image frames of 99m-Tc LLEC RD Study. There was no significant difference between the split renal function estimated from original and its compressed RD study. The average SSIM value, average compression ratio, and SVD computation time were found to be 0.7521, 1.475, and 0.1200. CONCLUSIONS: Visually, compressed image was identical to the original image. The percentage compression achieved was found to be up to 58% (compression factor achieved = 1.57). The SVD computation time was approximately 0.12 s for 64 × 64 matrix size image frame. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9930461/ /pubmed/36817198 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_59_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chaudhary, Jagrati
Pandey, Anil Kumar
Sharma, Param Dev
Patel, Chetan
Kumar, Rakesh
Renal Dynamic Image Compression using Singular Value Decomposition
title Renal Dynamic Image Compression using Singular Value Decomposition
title_full Renal Dynamic Image Compression using Singular Value Decomposition
title_fullStr Renal Dynamic Image Compression using Singular Value Decomposition
title_full_unstemmed Renal Dynamic Image Compression using Singular Value Decomposition
title_short Renal Dynamic Image Compression using Singular Value Decomposition
title_sort renal dynamic image compression using singular value decomposition
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817198
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_59_22
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudharyjagrati renaldynamicimagecompressionusingsingularvaluedecomposition
AT pandeyanilkumar renaldynamicimagecompressionusingsingularvaluedecomposition
AT sharmaparamdev renaldynamicimagecompressionusingsingularvaluedecomposition
AT patelchetan renaldynamicimagecompressionusingsingularvaluedecomposition
AT kumarrakesh renaldynamicimagecompressionusingsingularvaluedecomposition