Cargando…

High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Low pressure nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) has long been the mainstay of non-invasive respiratory support for preterm neonates, at a constant distending pressure of 5–8 cmH2O. When traditional nCPAP pressures are insufficient, other modes including nasal intermitten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mukerji, Amit, Rempel, Emily, Thabane, Lehana, Johnson, Heather, Schmolzer, Georg, Law, Brenda Hiu Yan, Jani, Pranav, Tracy, Mark, Rottkamp, Catherine, Keszler, Martin, Kirpalani, Haresh, Shah, Prakesh S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36787974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069024
_version_ 1784889060689444864
author Mukerji, Amit
Rempel, Emily
Thabane, Lehana
Johnson, Heather
Schmolzer, Georg
Law, Brenda Hiu Yan
Jani, Pranav
Tracy, Mark
Rottkamp, Catherine
Keszler, Martin
Kirpalani, Haresh
Shah, Prakesh S
author_facet Mukerji, Amit
Rempel, Emily
Thabane, Lehana
Johnson, Heather
Schmolzer, Georg
Law, Brenda Hiu Yan
Jani, Pranav
Tracy, Mark
Rottkamp, Catherine
Keszler, Martin
Kirpalani, Haresh
Shah, Prakesh S
author_sort Mukerji, Amit
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Low pressure nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) has long been the mainstay of non-invasive respiratory support for preterm neonates, at a constant distending pressure of 5–8 cmH2O. When traditional nCPAP pressures are insufficient, other modes including nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) are used. In recent years, high nCPAP pressures (≥9 cmH2O) have also emerged as an alternative. However, the comparative benefits and risks of these modalities remain unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial, infants <29 weeks’ gestational age (GA) who either: (A) fail treatment with traditional nCPAP or (B) being extubated from invasive mechanical ventilation with mean airway pressure ≥10 cmH2O, will be randomised to receive either high nCPAP (positive end-expiratory pressure 9–15 cmH2O) or NIPPV (target mean Paw 9–15 cmH2O). Primary outcome is feasibility of the conduct of a larger, definitive trial as assessed by rates of recruitment and protocol violations. The main secondary outcome is failure of assigned treatment within 7 days postrandomisation. Multiple other clinical outcomes including bronchopulmonary dysplasia will be ascertained. All randomised participants will be analysed using intention to treat. Baseline and demographic variables as well as outcomes will be summarised and compared using univariate analyses, and a p<0.05 will be considered significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the respective research ethics boards at each institution (McMaster Children’s Hospital: Hamilton integrated REB approval #2113; Royal Alexandra Hospital: Health Research Ethics Board approval ID Pro00090244; Westmead Hospital: Human Research Ethics Committee approval ID 2022/ETH01343). Written, informed consent will be obtained from all parents/guardians prior to study enrolment. The findings of this pilot study will be disseminated via presentations at national and international conferences and via publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Social media platforms including Twitter will also be used to generate awareness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03512158.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9930542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99305422023-02-16 High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial Mukerji, Amit Rempel, Emily Thabane, Lehana Johnson, Heather Schmolzer, Georg Law, Brenda Hiu Yan Jani, Pranav Tracy, Mark Rottkamp, Catherine Keszler, Martin Kirpalani, Haresh Shah, Prakesh S BMJ Open Paediatrics INTRODUCTION: Low pressure nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) has long been the mainstay of non-invasive respiratory support for preterm neonates, at a constant distending pressure of 5–8 cmH2O. When traditional nCPAP pressures are insufficient, other modes including nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) are used. In recent years, high nCPAP pressures (≥9 cmH2O) have also emerged as an alternative. However, the comparative benefits and risks of these modalities remain unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial, infants <29 weeks’ gestational age (GA) who either: (A) fail treatment with traditional nCPAP or (B) being extubated from invasive mechanical ventilation with mean airway pressure ≥10 cmH2O, will be randomised to receive either high nCPAP (positive end-expiratory pressure 9–15 cmH2O) or NIPPV (target mean Paw 9–15 cmH2O). Primary outcome is feasibility of the conduct of a larger, definitive trial as assessed by rates of recruitment and protocol violations. The main secondary outcome is failure of assigned treatment within 7 days postrandomisation. Multiple other clinical outcomes including bronchopulmonary dysplasia will be ascertained. All randomised participants will be analysed using intention to treat. Baseline and demographic variables as well as outcomes will be summarised and compared using univariate analyses, and a p<0.05 will be considered significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the respective research ethics boards at each institution (McMaster Children’s Hospital: Hamilton integrated REB approval #2113; Royal Alexandra Hospital: Health Research Ethics Board approval ID Pro00090244; Westmead Hospital: Human Research Ethics Committee approval ID 2022/ETH01343). Written, informed consent will be obtained from all parents/guardians prior to study enrolment. The findings of this pilot study will be disseminated via presentations at national and international conferences and via publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Social media platforms including Twitter will also be used to generate awareness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03512158. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9930542/ /pubmed/36787974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069024 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Mukerji, Amit
Rempel, Emily
Thabane, Lehana
Johnson, Heather
Schmolzer, Georg
Law, Brenda Hiu Yan
Jani, Pranav
Tracy, Mark
Rottkamp, Catherine
Keszler, Martin
Kirpalani, Haresh
Shah, Prakesh S
High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial
title High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort high continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36787974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069024
work_keys_str_mv AT mukerjiamit highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rempelemily highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thabanelehana highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT johnsonheather highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schmolzergeorg highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lawbrendahiuyan highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT janipranav highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tracymark highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rottkampcatherine highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT keszlermartin highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kirpalaniharesh highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shahprakeshs highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT highcontinuouspositiveairwaypressuresversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinpretermneonatesprotocolforamulticentrepilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial