Cargando…
Is telemedicine a holy grail in healthcare policy: clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives from an Apex Institution in Western India
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the perception of doctors regarding telemedicine consultations and the level of patient satisfaction with the services received through teleconsultations. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on clinicians who provided teleconsultations and patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-09013-y |
_version_ | 1784889085921329152 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Nainsi Gupta, Manoj Kumar Joshi, Nitin Kumar Mantri, Neha Sridevi, G. Patel, Mamta Goel, Akhil Dhanesh Singh, Kuldeep Garg, M. K. Bhardwaj, Pankaj |
author_facet | Gupta, Nainsi Gupta, Manoj Kumar Joshi, Nitin Kumar Mantri, Neha Sridevi, G. Patel, Mamta Goel, Akhil Dhanesh Singh, Kuldeep Garg, M. K. Bhardwaj, Pankaj |
author_sort | Gupta, Nainsi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the perception of doctors regarding telemedicine consultations and the level of patient satisfaction with the services received through teleconsultations. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on clinicians who provided teleconsultations and patients who received teleconsultations in an Apex healthcare institution in Western India. Semi-structured interview schedules were used to record the quantitative and qualitative information. Clinicians’ perceptions and patients’ satisfaction were assessed using two different 5-point Likert scales. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.23 using non-parametric tests (Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U). RESULTS: A total of 52 clinicians who delivered teleconsultations and 134 patients who received teleconsultations from those doctors were interviewed in this study. For 69% of doctors, telemedicine was feasible to implement, and for the rest, it was challenging. Doctors believe telemedicine is convenient for patients (77%) and prevents the transmission of infection (94.2%). Difficulty in clinical evaluation (73%), communication (55.7%), network connectivity (34%), diagnosis and investigations (32%), and patients’ e-illiteracy (32%) were the most common challenges faced by clinicians. Patients’ experiences were positive in terms of ease of registration (82.1%), audio quality (100%), freedom to discuss medicine (94.8%), and comprehension of the diagnoses (88.1%). Patients expressed satisfaction with the length of the teleconsultation (81.4%), the advice and care they received (78.4%), and the manner and communication of the clinicians (78.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Though there were some challenges in the implementation of telemedicine, the clinicians perceived it quite helpful. The majority of the patients were satisfied with teleconsultation services. Difficulty in registration, lack of communication, and a deep-rooted mindset of physical consultations were the primary concerns from the patient side. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-09013-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9930698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99306982023-02-16 Is telemedicine a holy grail in healthcare policy: clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives from an Apex Institution in Western India Gupta, Nainsi Gupta, Manoj Kumar Joshi, Nitin Kumar Mantri, Neha Sridevi, G. Patel, Mamta Goel, Akhil Dhanesh Singh, Kuldeep Garg, M. K. Bhardwaj, Pankaj BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the perception of doctors regarding telemedicine consultations and the level of patient satisfaction with the services received through teleconsultations. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on clinicians who provided teleconsultations and patients who received teleconsultations in an Apex healthcare institution in Western India. Semi-structured interview schedules were used to record the quantitative and qualitative information. Clinicians’ perceptions and patients’ satisfaction were assessed using two different 5-point Likert scales. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.23 using non-parametric tests (Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U). RESULTS: A total of 52 clinicians who delivered teleconsultations and 134 patients who received teleconsultations from those doctors were interviewed in this study. For 69% of doctors, telemedicine was feasible to implement, and for the rest, it was challenging. Doctors believe telemedicine is convenient for patients (77%) and prevents the transmission of infection (94.2%). Difficulty in clinical evaluation (73%), communication (55.7%), network connectivity (34%), diagnosis and investigations (32%), and patients’ e-illiteracy (32%) were the most common challenges faced by clinicians. Patients’ experiences were positive in terms of ease of registration (82.1%), audio quality (100%), freedom to discuss medicine (94.8%), and comprehension of the diagnoses (88.1%). Patients expressed satisfaction with the length of the teleconsultation (81.4%), the advice and care they received (78.4%), and the manner and communication of the clinicians (78.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Though there were some challenges in the implementation of telemedicine, the clinicians perceived it quite helpful. The majority of the patients were satisfied with teleconsultation services. Difficulty in registration, lack of communication, and a deep-rooted mindset of physical consultations were the primary concerns from the patient side. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-09013-y. BioMed Central 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9930698/ /pubmed/36793030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-09013-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Gupta, Nainsi Gupta, Manoj Kumar Joshi, Nitin Kumar Mantri, Neha Sridevi, G. Patel, Mamta Goel, Akhil Dhanesh Singh, Kuldeep Garg, M. K. Bhardwaj, Pankaj Is telemedicine a holy grail in healthcare policy: clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives from an Apex Institution in Western India |
title | Is telemedicine a holy grail in healthcare policy: clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives from an Apex Institution in Western India |
title_full | Is telemedicine a holy grail in healthcare policy: clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives from an Apex Institution in Western India |
title_fullStr | Is telemedicine a holy grail in healthcare policy: clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives from an Apex Institution in Western India |
title_full_unstemmed | Is telemedicine a holy grail in healthcare policy: clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives from an Apex Institution in Western India |
title_short | Is telemedicine a holy grail in healthcare policy: clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives from an Apex Institution in Western India |
title_sort | is telemedicine a holy grail in healthcare policy: clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives from an apex institution in western india |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-09013-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptanainsi istelemedicineaholygrailinhealthcarepolicycliniciansandpatientsperspectivesfromanapexinstitutioninwesternindia AT guptamanojkumar istelemedicineaholygrailinhealthcarepolicycliniciansandpatientsperspectivesfromanapexinstitutioninwesternindia AT joshinitinkumar istelemedicineaholygrailinhealthcarepolicycliniciansandpatientsperspectivesfromanapexinstitutioninwesternindia AT mantrineha istelemedicineaholygrailinhealthcarepolicycliniciansandpatientsperspectivesfromanapexinstitutioninwesternindia AT sridevig istelemedicineaholygrailinhealthcarepolicycliniciansandpatientsperspectivesfromanapexinstitutioninwesternindia AT patelmamta istelemedicineaholygrailinhealthcarepolicycliniciansandpatientsperspectivesfromanapexinstitutioninwesternindia AT goelakhildhanesh istelemedicineaholygrailinhealthcarepolicycliniciansandpatientsperspectivesfromanapexinstitutioninwesternindia AT singhkuldeep istelemedicineaholygrailinhealthcarepolicycliniciansandpatientsperspectivesfromanapexinstitutioninwesternindia AT gargmk istelemedicineaholygrailinhealthcarepolicycliniciansandpatientsperspectivesfromanapexinstitutioninwesternindia AT bhardwajpankaj istelemedicineaholygrailinhealthcarepolicycliniciansandpatientsperspectivesfromanapexinstitutioninwesternindia |