Cargando…
A Review on the Safety of Using JAK Inhibitors in Dermatology: Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are disease-modifying agents with efficacy in treating a spectrum of burdensome dermatologic conditions. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently placed a black box warning on this class of medications due to safety concerns based on data from studies investig...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36790724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-00892-5 |
_version_ | 1784889088188350464 |
---|---|
author | Samuel, Christeen Cornman, Hannah Kambala, Anusha Kwatra, Shawn G. |
author_facet | Samuel, Christeen Cornman, Hannah Kambala, Anusha Kwatra, Shawn G. |
author_sort | Samuel, Christeen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are disease-modifying agents with efficacy in treating a spectrum of burdensome dermatologic conditions. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently placed a black box warning on this class of medications due to safety concerns based on data from studies investigating tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Here we provide an overview of the timeline of FDA approval of JAK inhibitors in dermatology. We also discuss the available safety profiles of approved oral JAK1 inhibitors, namely abrocitinib and upadacitinib, oral baricitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, a Tyk2 inhibitor, and the topical JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in dermatology patients. Additionally, we offer suggestions for initial screening and laboratory monitoring for patients receiving JAK inhibitors. We found that the rates of venous thromboembolism reported in trials ranged from no events to 0.1–0.5% in dermatology-specific phase 3 clinical trials compared with no events in the placebo. The rates of cardiovascular events ranged from no events to 0.4–1.2% compared with no events to 0.5–1.2% in the placebo. The rates of serious infections were 0.4–4.8% compared with no events to 0.5–1.3% in the placebo. The rates of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) ranged from no event to 0.6–0.9% compared with no events in the placebo. The rates of non-NMSC ranged from no event to 0.2–0.7% compared with no event to 0.6% in the placebo. Most patients who developed these adverse events had risk factors for the specific event. The most common adverse events of oral JAK inhibitors included upper respiratory infections, nasopharyngitis, nausea, headache, and acne. Dermatologists should consider patients’ baseline risk factors for developing serious complications when prescribing oral JAK inhibitors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9930707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99307072023-02-16 A Review on the Safety of Using JAK Inhibitors in Dermatology: Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring Samuel, Christeen Cornman, Hannah Kambala, Anusha Kwatra, Shawn G. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Review Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are disease-modifying agents with efficacy in treating a spectrum of burdensome dermatologic conditions. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently placed a black box warning on this class of medications due to safety concerns based on data from studies investigating tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Here we provide an overview of the timeline of FDA approval of JAK inhibitors in dermatology. We also discuss the available safety profiles of approved oral JAK1 inhibitors, namely abrocitinib and upadacitinib, oral baricitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, a Tyk2 inhibitor, and the topical JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in dermatology patients. Additionally, we offer suggestions for initial screening and laboratory monitoring for patients receiving JAK inhibitors. We found that the rates of venous thromboembolism reported in trials ranged from no events to 0.1–0.5% in dermatology-specific phase 3 clinical trials compared with no events in the placebo. The rates of cardiovascular events ranged from no events to 0.4–1.2% compared with no events to 0.5–1.2% in the placebo. The rates of serious infections were 0.4–4.8% compared with no events to 0.5–1.3% in the placebo. The rates of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) ranged from no event to 0.6–0.9% compared with no events in the placebo. The rates of non-NMSC ranged from no event to 0.2–0.7% compared with no event to 0.6% in the placebo. Most patients who developed these adverse events had risk factors for the specific event. The most common adverse events of oral JAK inhibitors included upper respiratory infections, nasopharyngitis, nausea, headache, and acne. Dermatologists should consider patients’ baseline risk factors for developing serious complications when prescribing oral JAK inhibitors. Springer Healthcare 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9930707/ /pubmed/36790724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-00892-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Samuel, Christeen Cornman, Hannah Kambala, Anusha Kwatra, Shawn G. A Review on the Safety of Using JAK Inhibitors in Dermatology: Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring |
title | A Review on the Safety of Using JAK Inhibitors in Dermatology: Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring |
title_full | A Review on the Safety of Using JAK Inhibitors in Dermatology: Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring |
title_fullStr | A Review on the Safety of Using JAK Inhibitors in Dermatology: Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review on the Safety of Using JAK Inhibitors in Dermatology: Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring |
title_short | A Review on the Safety of Using JAK Inhibitors in Dermatology: Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring |
title_sort | review on the safety of using jak inhibitors in dermatology: clinical and laboratory monitoring |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36790724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-023-00892-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samuelchristeen areviewonthesafetyofusingjakinhibitorsindermatologyclinicalandlaboratorymonitoring AT cornmanhannah areviewonthesafetyofusingjakinhibitorsindermatologyclinicalandlaboratorymonitoring AT kambalaanusha areviewonthesafetyofusingjakinhibitorsindermatologyclinicalandlaboratorymonitoring AT kwatrashawng areviewonthesafetyofusingjakinhibitorsindermatologyclinicalandlaboratorymonitoring AT samuelchristeen reviewonthesafetyofusingjakinhibitorsindermatologyclinicalandlaboratorymonitoring AT cornmanhannah reviewonthesafetyofusingjakinhibitorsindermatologyclinicalandlaboratorymonitoring AT kambalaanusha reviewonthesafetyofusingjakinhibitorsindermatologyclinicalandlaboratorymonitoring AT kwatrashawng reviewonthesafetyofusingjakinhibitorsindermatologyclinicalandlaboratorymonitoring |