Cargando…

Propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network

BACKGROUND: Propensity score analysis is increasingly used to control for confounding factors in observational studies. Unfortunately, unavoidable missing values make estimating propensity scores extremely challenging. We propose a new method for estimating propensity scores in data with missing val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Shu, Du, Peipei, Feng, Xixi, He, Daihai, Chen, Yaolong, Zhong, Linda L. D., Yan, Xiaodong, Luo, Jiawei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01847-2
_version_ 1784889088659161088
author Yang, Shu
Du, Peipei
Feng, Xixi
He, Daihai
Chen, Yaolong
Zhong, Linda L. D.
Yan, Xiaodong
Luo, Jiawei
author_facet Yang, Shu
Du, Peipei
Feng, Xixi
He, Daihai
Chen, Yaolong
Zhong, Linda L. D.
Yan, Xiaodong
Luo, Jiawei
author_sort Yang, Shu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Propensity score analysis is increasingly used to control for confounding factors in observational studies. Unfortunately, unavoidable missing values make estimating propensity scores extremely challenging. We propose a new method for estimating propensity scores in data with missing values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both simulated and real-world datasets are used in our experiments. The simulated datasets were constructed under 2 scenarios, the presence (T = 1) and the absence (T = 0) of the true effect. The real-world dataset comes from LaLonde’s employment training program. We construct missing data with varying degrees of missing rates under three missing mechanisms: MAR, MCAR, and MNAR. Then we compare MTNN with 2 other traditional methods in different scenarios. The experiments in each scenario were repeated 20,000 times. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/ljwa2323/MTNN. RESULTS: Under the three missing mechanisms of MAR, MCAR and MNAR, the RMSE between the effect and the true effect estimated by our proposed method is the smallest in simulations and in real-world data. Furthermore, the standard deviation of the effect estimated by our method is the smallest. In situations where the missing rate is low, the estimation of our method is more accurate. CONCLUSIONS: MTNN can perform propensity score estimation and missing value filling at the same time through shared hidden layers and joint learning, which solves the dilemma of traditional methods and is very suitable for estimating true effects in samples with missing values. The method is expected to be broadly generalized and applied to real-world observational studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-023-01847-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9930709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99307092023-02-16 Propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network Yang, Shu Du, Peipei Feng, Xixi He, Daihai Chen, Yaolong Zhong, Linda L. D. Yan, Xiaodong Luo, Jiawei BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Propensity score analysis is increasingly used to control for confounding factors in observational studies. Unfortunately, unavoidable missing values make estimating propensity scores extremely challenging. We propose a new method for estimating propensity scores in data with missing values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both simulated and real-world datasets are used in our experiments. The simulated datasets were constructed under 2 scenarios, the presence (T = 1) and the absence (T = 0) of the true effect. The real-world dataset comes from LaLonde’s employment training program. We construct missing data with varying degrees of missing rates under three missing mechanisms: MAR, MCAR, and MNAR. Then we compare MTNN with 2 other traditional methods in different scenarios. The experiments in each scenario were repeated 20,000 times. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/ljwa2323/MTNN. RESULTS: Under the three missing mechanisms of MAR, MCAR and MNAR, the RMSE between the effect and the true effect estimated by our proposed method is the smallest in simulations and in real-world data. Furthermore, the standard deviation of the effect estimated by our method is the smallest. In situations where the missing rate is low, the estimation of our method is more accurate. CONCLUSIONS: MTNN can perform propensity score estimation and missing value filling at the same time through shared hidden layers and joint learning, which solves the dilemma of traditional methods and is very suitable for estimating true effects in samples with missing values. The method is expected to be broadly generalized and applied to real-world observational studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-023-01847-2. BioMed Central 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9930709/ /pubmed/36793016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01847-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yang, Shu
Du, Peipei
Feng, Xixi
He, Daihai
Chen, Yaolong
Zhong, Linda L. D.
Yan, Xiaodong
Luo, Jiawei
Propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network
title Propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network
title_full Propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network
title_fullStr Propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network
title_full_unstemmed Propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network
title_short Propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network
title_sort propensity score analysis with missing data using a multi-task neural network
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01847-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yangshu propensityscoreanalysiswithmissingdatausingamultitaskneuralnetwork
AT dupeipei propensityscoreanalysiswithmissingdatausingamultitaskneuralnetwork
AT fengxixi propensityscoreanalysiswithmissingdatausingamultitaskneuralnetwork
AT hedaihai propensityscoreanalysiswithmissingdatausingamultitaskneuralnetwork
AT chenyaolong propensityscoreanalysiswithmissingdatausingamultitaskneuralnetwork
AT zhonglindald propensityscoreanalysiswithmissingdatausingamultitaskneuralnetwork
AT yanxiaodong propensityscoreanalysiswithmissingdatausingamultitaskneuralnetwork
AT luojiawei propensityscoreanalysiswithmissingdatausingamultitaskneuralnetwork