Cargando…
Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial
To evaluate the effectiveness of smartphone ophthalmoscope (SO) in teaching ophthalmoscopy, compared with direct ophthalmoscope (DO). In this cross-over study, 45 final-year medical students attending sessions at a single institution were randomly allocated to two groups (A and B). Both groups atten...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36762913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2176201 |
_version_ | 1784889102116585472 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Hongxi Liao, Xulong Zhang, Mingzhi Pang, Chi Pui Chen, Haoyu |
author_facet | Wang, Hongxi Liao, Xulong Zhang, Mingzhi Pang, Chi Pui Chen, Haoyu |
author_sort | Wang, Hongxi |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the effectiveness of smartphone ophthalmoscope (SO) in teaching ophthalmoscopy, compared with direct ophthalmoscope (DO). In this cross-over study, 45 final-year medical students attending sessions at a single institution were randomly allocated to two groups (A and B). Both groups attended two training sessions. In the first session, Group A students were taught ophthalmoscopy using DO and Group B students using SO. In the second session, the training sessions were crossed over. A series of eye models with 10 letters placed on the inner surface were designed to assess the students’ skill on ophthalmoscopy. Students performed ophthalmoscopy on the eye models, recorded their findings, and completed a questionnaire of feedback on DO and SO. The main outcome measure was the score of ophthalmoscopy, assessed by the student correctly recording each letter (score 1 for each letter). For Group A, the mean score of ophthalmoscopy on the eye model using DO and SO was 3.9±2.4 and 8.2±2.2, respectively. For Group B, the mean score of ophthalmoscopy on the eye model using SO and DO 8.7±1.8 and 5.7±3.5 . Students scored significantly higher in ophthalmoscopy when using SO than DO (P<0.001). They expressed better visualization of the fundus using SO than DO (4.49±0.65 vs 4.13±0.81, P=0.004). Students’ performance of ophthalmoscopy was better when SO was used compared with DO. The use of SO as an adjunctive tool is recommended to improve the effectiveness of teaching ophthalmoscopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9930769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99307692023-02-16 Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial Wang, Hongxi Liao, Xulong Zhang, Mingzhi Pang, Chi Pui Chen, Haoyu Med Educ Online Research Article To evaluate the effectiveness of smartphone ophthalmoscope (SO) in teaching ophthalmoscopy, compared with direct ophthalmoscope (DO). In this cross-over study, 45 final-year medical students attending sessions at a single institution were randomly allocated to two groups (A and B). Both groups attended two training sessions. In the first session, Group A students were taught ophthalmoscopy using DO and Group B students using SO. In the second session, the training sessions were crossed over. A series of eye models with 10 letters placed on the inner surface were designed to assess the students’ skill on ophthalmoscopy. Students performed ophthalmoscopy on the eye models, recorded their findings, and completed a questionnaire of feedback on DO and SO. The main outcome measure was the score of ophthalmoscopy, assessed by the student correctly recording each letter (score 1 for each letter). For Group A, the mean score of ophthalmoscopy on the eye model using DO and SO was 3.9±2.4 and 8.2±2.2, respectively. For Group B, the mean score of ophthalmoscopy on the eye model using SO and DO 8.7±1.8 and 5.7±3.5 . Students scored significantly higher in ophthalmoscopy when using SO than DO (P<0.001). They expressed better visualization of the fundus using SO than DO (4.49±0.65 vs 4.13±0.81, P=0.004). Students’ performance of ophthalmoscopy was better when SO was used compared with DO. The use of SO as an adjunctive tool is recommended to improve the effectiveness of teaching ophthalmoscopy. Taylor & Francis 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9930769/ /pubmed/36762913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2176201 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Hongxi Liao, Xulong Zhang, Mingzhi Pang, Chi Pui Chen, Haoyu Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial |
title | Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36762913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2176201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghongxi smartphoneophthalmoscopeasatoolinteachingdirectophthalmoscopyacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liaoxulong smartphoneophthalmoscopeasatoolinteachingdirectophthalmoscopyacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangmingzhi smartphoneophthalmoscopeasatoolinteachingdirectophthalmoscopyacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pangchipui smartphoneophthalmoscopeasatoolinteachingdirectophthalmoscopyacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenhaoyu smartphoneophthalmoscopeasatoolinteachingdirectophthalmoscopyacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial |