Cargando…

Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial

To evaluate the effectiveness of smartphone ophthalmoscope (SO) in teaching ophthalmoscopy, compared with direct ophthalmoscope (DO). In this cross-over study, 45 final-year medical students attending sessions at a single institution were randomly allocated to two groups (A and B). Both groups atten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hongxi, Liao, Xulong, Zhang, Mingzhi, Pang, Chi Pui, Chen, Haoyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36762913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2176201
_version_ 1784889102116585472
author Wang, Hongxi
Liao, Xulong
Zhang, Mingzhi
Pang, Chi Pui
Chen, Haoyu
author_facet Wang, Hongxi
Liao, Xulong
Zhang, Mingzhi
Pang, Chi Pui
Chen, Haoyu
author_sort Wang, Hongxi
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the effectiveness of smartphone ophthalmoscope (SO) in teaching ophthalmoscopy, compared with direct ophthalmoscope (DO). In this cross-over study, 45 final-year medical students attending sessions at a single institution were randomly allocated to two groups (A and B). Both groups attended two training sessions. In the first session, Group A students were taught ophthalmoscopy using DO and Group B students using SO. In the second session, the training sessions were crossed over. A series of eye models with 10 letters placed on the inner surface were designed to assess the students’ skill on ophthalmoscopy. Students performed ophthalmoscopy on the eye models, recorded their findings, and completed a questionnaire of feedback on DO and SO. The main outcome measure was the score of ophthalmoscopy, assessed by the student correctly recording each letter (score 1 for each letter). For Group A, the mean score of ophthalmoscopy on the eye model using DO and SO was 3.9±2.4 and 8.2±2.2, respectively. For Group B, the mean score of ophthalmoscopy on the eye model using SO and DO 8.7±1.8 and 5.7±3.5 . Students scored significantly higher in ophthalmoscopy when using SO than DO (P<0.001). They expressed better visualization of the fundus using SO than DO (4.49±0.65 vs 4.13±0.81, P=0.004). Students’ performance of ophthalmoscopy was better when SO was used compared with DO. The use of SO as an adjunctive tool is recommended to improve the effectiveness of teaching ophthalmoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9930769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99307692023-02-16 Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial Wang, Hongxi Liao, Xulong Zhang, Mingzhi Pang, Chi Pui Chen, Haoyu Med Educ Online Research Article To evaluate the effectiveness of smartphone ophthalmoscope (SO) in teaching ophthalmoscopy, compared with direct ophthalmoscope (DO). In this cross-over study, 45 final-year medical students attending sessions at a single institution were randomly allocated to two groups (A and B). Both groups attended two training sessions. In the first session, Group A students were taught ophthalmoscopy using DO and Group B students using SO. In the second session, the training sessions were crossed over. A series of eye models with 10 letters placed on the inner surface were designed to assess the students’ skill on ophthalmoscopy. Students performed ophthalmoscopy on the eye models, recorded their findings, and completed a questionnaire of feedback on DO and SO. The main outcome measure was the score of ophthalmoscopy, assessed by the student correctly recording each letter (score 1 for each letter). For Group A, the mean score of ophthalmoscopy on the eye model using DO and SO was 3.9±2.4 and 8.2±2.2, respectively. For Group B, the mean score of ophthalmoscopy on the eye model using SO and DO 8.7±1.8 and 5.7±3.5 . Students scored significantly higher in ophthalmoscopy when using SO than DO (P<0.001). They expressed better visualization of the fundus using SO than DO (4.49±0.65 vs 4.13±0.81, P=0.004). Students’ performance of ophthalmoscopy was better when SO was used compared with DO. The use of SO as an adjunctive tool is recommended to improve the effectiveness of teaching ophthalmoscopy. Taylor & Francis 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9930769/ /pubmed/36762913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2176201 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Hongxi
Liao, Xulong
Zhang, Mingzhi
Pang, Chi Pui
Chen, Haoyu
Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial
title Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial
title_full Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial
title_short Smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial
title_sort smartphone ophthalmoscope as a tool in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy: a crossover randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36762913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2176201
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghongxi smartphoneophthalmoscopeasatoolinteachingdirectophthalmoscopyacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liaoxulong smartphoneophthalmoscopeasatoolinteachingdirectophthalmoscopyacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangmingzhi smartphoneophthalmoscopeasatoolinteachingdirectophthalmoscopyacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pangchipui smartphoneophthalmoscopeasatoolinteachingdirectophthalmoscopyacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenhaoyu smartphoneophthalmoscopeasatoolinteachingdirectophthalmoscopyacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial