Cargando…

Recommendations for procedures related to the evidence chain of custody in forensic anthropology in Brazil

Forensic anthropologists perform specialised analysis, mainly involving skeletonised human remains, cadavers in advanced stages of decomposition, disassociated elements from the human body, and human remains in extreme carbonisation. The main objectives of the forensic anthropology expertise are hum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damascena, Nicole Prata, Calmon Silva, Melina, Deitos, Alexandre Raphael, Baldasso, Rosane Pérez, Ferreira, Renata Cristina Grangeiro, Kotinda Júnior, Cristian, Palhares Machado, Carlos Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2022.2076984
_version_ 1784889121285603328
author Damascena, Nicole Prata
Calmon Silva, Melina
Deitos, Alexandre Raphael
Baldasso, Rosane Pérez
Ferreira, Renata Cristina Grangeiro
Kotinda Júnior, Cristian
Palhares Machado, Carlos Eduardo
author_facet Damascena, Nicole Prata
Calmon Silva, Melina
Deitos, Alexandre Raphael
Baldasso, Rosane Pérez
Ferreira, Renata Cristina Grangeiro
Kotinda Júnior, Cristian
Palhares Machado, Carlos Eduardo
author_sort Damascena, Nicole Prata
collection PubMed
description Forensic anthropologists perform specialised analysis, mainly involving skeletonised human remains, cadavers in advanced stages of decomposition, disassociated elements from the human body, and human remains in extreme carbonisation. The main objectives of the forensic anthropology expertise are human identification and assisting in determining the cause and manner of death. Estimating the time since death is also a priority for some cases, especially ones involving missing persons. This science works on individual cases, violent deaths, missing persons, mass disasters, suspected violations of human rights, and crimes against humanity. Forensic anthropological evidence is, in general, very sensitive. Thus, it is important to detail aspects relevant to the maintenance of the chain of custody at all phases of the investigation, as well as standardise the actions of the individuals involved. This aims to preserve the evidence integrity and sameness (Sameness: free translation of the Portuguese word “mesmidade”, derived from a Spanish word that does not possess a translation to Portuguese. Sameness of evidence is understood as the guarantee that the evidence under valuation (or under analysis of its probative value) is exactly and integrally the same one which was collected, corresponding, therefore, to “the same” (and not “part of”, “derived from”), safeguarding its value. Brazil Law No. 13.964 of 14 December 2019 establishes and lists 10 phases related to the evidence chain of custody that must be followed. These newly introduced requirements resulted in the need for adaptation of the forensic, investigative, and legal actors involved in an investigation, and in the detailed description of the procedures for the different areas related to criminalistics, including forensic anthropology. The information provided in this article should be interpreted as recommendations, even though their non-compliance may weaken the investigative and forensic analysis processes in whole or in part.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9930860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99308602023-02-16 Recommendations for procedures related to the evidence chain of custody in forensic anthropology in Brazil Damascena, Nicole Prata Calmon Silva, Melina Deitos, Alexandre Raphael Baldasso, Rosane Pérez Ferreira, Renata Cristina Grangeiro Kotinda Júnior, Cristian Palhares Machado, Carlos Eduardo Forensic Sci Res Research Articles Forensic anthropologists perform specialised analysis, mainly involving skeletonised human remains, cadavers in advanced stages of decomposition, disassociated elements from the human body, and human remains in extreme carbonisation. The main objectives of the forensic anthropology expertise are human identification and assisting in determining the cause and manner of death. Estimating the time since death is also a priority for some cases, especially ones involving missing persons. This science works on individual cases, violent deaths, missing persons, mass disasters, suspected violations of human rights, and crimes against humanity. Forensic anthropological evidence is, in general, very sensitive. Thus, it is important to detail aspects relevant to the maintenance of the chain of custody at all phases of the investigation, as well as standardise the actions of the individuals involved. This aims to preserve the evidence integrity and sameness (Sameness: free translation of the Portuguese word “mesmidade”, derived from a Spanish word that does not possess a translation to Portuguese. Sameness of evidence is understood as the guarantee that the evidence under valuation (or under analysis of its probative value) is exactly and integrally the same one which was collected, corresponding, therefore, to “the same” (and not “part of”, “derived from”), safeguarding its value. Brazil Law No. 13.964 of 14 December 2019 establishes and lists 10 phases related to the evidence chain of custody that must be followed. These newly introduced requirements resulted in the need for adaptation of the forensic, investigative, and legal actors involved in an investigation, and in the detailed description of the procedures for the different areas related to criminalistics, including forensic anthropology. The information provided in this article should be interpreted as recommendations, even though their non-compliance may weaken the investigative and forensic analysis processes in whole or in part. Taylor & Francis 2023-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9930860/ /pubmed/36817245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2022.2076984 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Academy of Forensic Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Damascena, Nicole Prata
Calmon Silva, Melina
Deitos, Alexandre Raphael
Baldasso, Rosane Pérez
Ferreira, Renata Cristina Grangeiro
Kotinda Júnior, Cristian
Palhares Machado, Carlos Eduardo
Recommendations for procedures related to the evidence chain of custody in forensic anthropology in Brazil
title Recommendations for procedures related to the evidence chain of custody in forensic anthropology in Brazil
title_full Recommendations for procedures related to the evidence chain of custody in forensic anthropology in Brazil
title_fullStr Recommendations for procedures related to the evidence chain of custody in forensic anthropology in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for procedures related to the evidence chain of custody in forensic anthropology in Brazil
title_short Recommendations for procedures related to the evidence chain of custody in forensic anthropology in Brazil
title_sort recommendations for procedures related to the evidence chain of custody in forensic anthropology in brazil
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2022.2076984
work_keys_str_mv AT damascenanicoleprata recommendationsforproceduresrelatedtotheevidencechainofcustodyinforensicanthropologyinbrazil
AT calmonsilvamelina recommendationsforproceduresrelatedtotheevidencechainofcustodyinforensicanthropologyinbrazil
AT deitosalexandreraphael recommendationsforproceduresrelatedtotheevidencechainofcustodyinforensicanthropologyinbrazil
AT baldassorosaneperez recommendationsforproceduresrelatedtotheevidencechainofcustodyinforensicanthropologyinbrazil
AT ferreirarenatacristinagrangeiro recommendationsforproceduresrelatedtotheevidencechainofcustodyinforensicanthropologyinbrazil
AT kotindajuniorcristian recommendationsforproceduresrelatedtotheevidencechainofcustodyinforensicanthropologyinbrazil
AT palharesmachadocarloseduardo recommendationsforproceduresrelatedtotheevidencechainofcustodyinforensicanthropologyinbrazil