Cargando…
Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the association of rs1695 polymorphism in glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) with risk of oral cancer in a meta-analysis which was followed by a bioinformatics approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Related articles were collected through a systematic search i...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444599 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3859 |
_version_ | 1784889145781387264 |
---|---|
author | Baghaei, Ahmadali Behjati, Mohaddeseh Karimian, Ali |
author_facet | Baghaei, Ahmadali Behjati, Mohaddeseh Karimian, Ali |
author_sort | Baghaei, Ahmadali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the association of rs1695 polymorphism in glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) with risk of oral cancer in a meta-analysis which was followed by a bioinformatics approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Related articles were collected through a systematic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases up to June 2022 and then screened. Finally, seven studies, including 1249 cases of oral cancer and 1861 healthy individuals, were included in our meta-analysis. Seven different genetic models including G vs. A, GG+GA vs. AA, GG vs. GA+AA, GA vs. GG+AA, GG vs. GA, GG vs. AA, and GA vs. AA were used for the calculation of odds ratio and 95% confidence interval in order to assess the association between GSTP1-rs1695 polymorphism and oral cancer risk. Also, the ethnicity-based stratified analyses were performed using the seven mentioned models. Some bioinformatics software was used to investigate the effect of rs1695 polymorphism on the primary, secondary, and three-dimensional structure of GSTP1. RESULTS: Our results showed that rs1695 polymorphism was not associated with the risk of oral cancer in any seven genetic models (G vs. A: OR= 0.9331, 95%CI= 0.6339-1.3737, P= 0.726; GG vs. GA+AA: OR= 0.9112 , 95%CI= 0.6865-1.2093, P= 0.520; GG+GA vs. AA: OR= 0.9006, 95%CI= 0.5522-1.4690, P= 0.675; GA vs. GG+AA: OR= 0.8732, 95%CI= 0.5763-1.3230, P= 0.522; GG vs. AA: OR= 0.9516, 95%CI= 0.5503-1.6456, P= 0.859; GG vs. GA: OR= 1.0645, 95%CI= 0.7891-1.4359, P= 0.683; GA vs. AA: OR= 0.8825, 95%CI= 0.5499-1.4162, P= 0.604). Also, we did not observe any significant associations in ethnicity-based stratified analyses. But bioinformatics studies have shown that this polymorphism can alter the physicochemical properties and secondary structure of the protein. CONCLUSIONS: Based on results, the rs1695 polymorphism could not be considered a risk factor for oral cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9930972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99309722023-02-16 Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment Baghaei, Ahmadali Behjati, Mohaddeseh Karimian, Ali Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the association of rs1695 polymorphism in glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) with risk of oral cancer in a meta-analysis which was followed by a bioinformatics approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Related articles were collected through a systematic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases up to June 2022 and then screened. Finally, seven studies, including 1249 cases of oral cancer and 1861 healthy individuals, were included in our meta-analysis. Seven different genetic models including G vs. A, GG+GA vs. AA, GG vs. GA+AA, GA vs. GG+AA, GG vs. GA, GG vs. AA, and GA vs. AA were used for the calculation of odds ratio and 95% confidence interval in order to assess the association between GSTP1-rs1695 polymorphism and oral cancer risk. Also, the ethnicity-based stratified analyses were performed using the seven mentioned models. Some bioinformatics software was used to investigate the effect of rs1695 polymorphism on the primary, secondary, and three-dimensional structure of GSTP1. RESULTS: Our results showed that rs1695 polymorphism was not associated with the risk of oral cancer in any seven genetic models (G vs. A: OR= 0.9331, 95%CI= 0.6339-1.3737, P= 0.726; GG vs. GA+AA: OR= 0.9112 , 95%CI= 0.6865-1.2093, P= 0.520; GG+GA vs. AA: OR= 0.9006, 95%CI= 0.5522-1.4690, P= 0.675; GA vs. GG+AA: OR= 0.8732, 95%CI= 0.5763-1.3230, P= 0.522; GG vs. AA: OR= 0.9516, 95%CI= 0.5503-1.6456, P= 0.859; GG vs. GA: OR= 1.0645, 95%CI= 0.7891-1.4359, P= 0.683; GA vs. AA: OR= 0.8825, 95%CI= 0.5499-1.4162, P= 0.604). Also, we did not observe any significant associations in ethnicity-based stratified analyses. But bioinformatics studies have shown that this polymorphism can alter the physicochemical properties and secondary structure of the protein. CONCLUSIONS: Based on results, the rs1695 polymorphism could not be considered a risk factor for oral cancer. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9930972/ /pubmed/36444599 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3859 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baghaei, Ahmadali Behjati, Mohaddeseh Karimian, Ali Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment |
title | Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment |
title_full | Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment |
title_fullStr | Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment |
title_short | Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment |
title_sort | association analysis of gstp1-rs1695 polymorphism with the risk of oral cancer: a literature review, an updated meta-analysis, and a structural assessment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444599 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3859 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baghaeiahmadali associationanalysisofgstp1rs1695polymorphismwiththeriskoforalcanceraliteraturereviewanupdatedmetaanalysisandastructuralassessment AT behjatimohaddeseh associationanalysisofgstp1rs1695polymorphismwiththeriskoforalcanceraliteraturereviewanupdatedmetaanalysisandastructuralassessment AT karimianali associationanalysisofgstp1rs1695polymorphismwiththeriskoforalcanceraliteraturereviewanupdatedmetaanalysisandastructuralassessment |