Cargando…

Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the association of rs1695 polymorphism in glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) with risk of oral cancer in a meta-analysis which was followed by a bioinformatics approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Related articles were collected through a systematic search i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baghaei, Ahmadali, Behjati, Mohaddeseh, Karimian, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444599
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3859
_version_ 1784889145781387264
author Baghaei, Ahmadali
Behjati, Mohaddeseh
Karimian, Ali
author_facet Baghaei, Ahmadali
Behjati, Mohaddeseh
Karimian, Ali
author_sort Baghaei, Ahmadali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the association of rs1695 polymorphism in glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) with risk of oral cancer in a meta-analysis which was followed by a bioinformatics approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Related articles were collected through a systematic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases up to June 2022 and then screened. Finally, seven studies, including 1249 cases of oral cancer and 1861 healthy individuals, were included in our meta-analysis. Seven different genetic models including G vs. A, GG+GA vs. AA, GG vs. GA+AA, GA vs. GG+AA, GG vs. GA, GG vs. AA, and GA vs. AA were used for the calculation of odds ratio and 95% confidence interval in order to assess the association between GSTP1-rs1695 polymorphism and oral cancer risk. Also, the ethnicity-based stratified analyses were performed using the seven mentioned models. Some bioinformatics software was used to investigate the effect of rs1695 polymorphism on the primary, secondary, and three-dimensional structure of GSTP1. RESULTS: Our results showed that rs1695 polymorphism was not associated with the risk of oral cancer in any seven genetic models (G vs. A: OR= 0.9331, 95%CI= 0.6339-1.3737, P= 0.726; GG vs. GA+AA: OR= 0.9112 , 95%CI= 0.6865-1.2093, P= 0.520; GG+GA vs. AA: OR= 0.9006, 95%CI= 0.5522-1.4690, P= 0.675; GA vs. GG+AA: OR= 0.8732, 95%CI= 0.5763-1.3230, P= 0.522; GG vs. AA: OR= 0.9516, 95%CI= 0.5503-1.6456, P= 0.859; GG vs. GA: OR= 1.0645, 95%CI= 0.7891-1.4359, P= 0.683; GA vs. AA: OR= 0.8825, 95%CI= 0.5499-1.4162, P= 0.604). Also, we did not observe any significant associations in ethnicity-based stratified analyses. But bioinformatics studies have shown that this polymorphism can alter the physicochemical properties and secondary structure of the protein. CONCLUSIONS: Based on results, the rs1695 polymorphism could not be considered a risk factor for oral cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9930972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99309722023-02-16 Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment Baghaei, Ahmadali Behjati, Mohaddeseh Karimian, Ali Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the association of rs1695 polymorphism in glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) with risk of oral cancer in a meta-analysis which was followed by a bioinformatics approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Related articles were collected through a systematic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases up to June 2022 and then screened. Finally, seven studies, including 1249 cases of oral cancer and 1861 healthy individuals, were included in our meta-analysis. Seven different genetic models including G vs. A, GG+GA vs. AA, GG vs. GA+AA, GA vs. GG+AA, GG vs. GA, GG vs. AA, and GA vs. AA were used for the calculation of odds ratio and 95% confidence interval in order to assess the association between GSTP1-rs1695 polymorphism and oral cancer risk. Also, the ethnicity-based stratified analyses were performed using the seven mentioned models. Some bioinformatics software was used to investigate the effect of rs1695 polymorphism on the primary, secondary, and three-dimensional structure of GSTP1. RESULTS: Our results showed that rs1695 polymorphism was not associated with the risk of oral cancer in any seven genetic models (G vs. A: OR= 0.9331, 95%CI= 0.6339-1.3737, P= 0.726; GG vs. GA+AA: OR= 0.9112 , 95%CI= 0.6865-1.2093, P= 0.520; GG+GA vs. AA: OR= 0.9006, 95%CI= 0.5522-1.4690, P= 0.675; GA vs. GG+AA: OR= 0.8732, 95%CI= 0.5763-1.3230, P= 0.522; GG vs. AA: OR= 0.9516, 95%CI= 0.5503-1.6456, P= 0.859; GG vs. GA: OR= 1.0645, 95%CI= 0.7891-1.4359, P= 0.683; GA vs. AA: OR= 0.8825, 95%CI= 0.5499-1.4162, P= 0.604). Also, we did not observe any significant associations in ethnicity-based stratified analyses. But bioinformatics studies have shown that this polymorphism can alter the physicochemical properties and secondary structure of the protein. CONCLUSIONS: Based on results, the rs1695 polymorphism could not be considered a risk factor for oral cancer. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9930972/ /pubmed/36444599 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3859 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Baghaei, Ahmadali
Behjati, Mohaddeseh
Karimian, Ali
Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment
title Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment
title_full Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment
title_fullStr Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment
title_short Association Analysis of GSTP1-rs1695 Polymorphism with the Risk of Oral Cancer: A Literature Review, an Updated Meta-Analysis, and a Structural Assessment
title_sort association analysis of gstp1-rs1695 polymorphism with the risk of oral cancer: a literature review, an updated meta-analysis, and a structural assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444599
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3859
work_keys_str_mv AT baghaeiahmadali associationanalysisofgstp1rs1695polymorphismwiththeriskoforalcanceraliteraturereviewanupdatedmetaanalysisandastructuralassessment
AT behjatimohaddeseh associationanalysisofgstp1rs1695polymorphismwiththeriskoforalcanceraliteraturereviewanupdatedmetaanalysisandastructuralassessment
AT karimianali associationanalysisofgstp1rs1695polymorphismwiththeriskoforalcanceraliteraturereviewanupdatedmetaanalysisandastructuralassessment