Cargando…

A nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed data collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Chonghan, Ju, Houqiong, Liu, Dongning, He, Penghui, Wang, Daqiang, Yu, Hongxin, Lu, Weijie, Li, Taiyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1120960
_version_ 1784889194690117632
author Zhong, Chonghan
Ju, Houqiong
Liu, Dongning
He, Penghui
Wang, Daqiang
Yu, Hongxin
Lu, Weijie
Li, Taiyuan
author_facet Zhong, Chonghan
Ju, Houqiong
Liu, Dongning
He, Penghui
Wang, Daqiang
Yu, Hongxin
Lu, Weijie
Li, Taiyuan
author_sort Zhong, Chonghan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed data collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. In addition, in a 7:3 randomized design, all patients were split into two groups (development and validation cohorts). CSS predictors were selected via univariate and multivariate Cox regressions. The nomogram was constructed by analyzing univariate and multivariate predictors. The effectiveness of this nomogram was evaluated by concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Based on the total score of each patient in the development cohort in the nomogram, a risk stratification system was developed. In order to analyze the survival outcomes among different risk groups, Kaplan–Meier method was used. RESULTS: We selected 4,310 lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy, including a development cohort (70%, 3,017) and a validation cohort (30%, 1,293). The nomogram correlation C-index for the development cohort and the validation cohort was 0.702 (95% CI, 0.687–0.717) and 0.690 (95% CI, 0.665–0.715), respectively. The calibration curves for 3- and 5-year CSS showed great concordance. The 3- and 5-year areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC curves in the development cohort were 0.758 and 0.740, respectively, and 0.735 and 0.730 in the validation cohort, respectively. Following the establishment of the nomogram, we also established a risk stratification system. According to their nomogram total points, patients were divided into three risk groups. There were significant differences between the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As a result of our research, we developed a highly discriminatory and accurate nomogram and associated risk classification system to predict CSS in lymph-node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy. This model can help predict the prognosis of patients with lymph- node- positive rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9931193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99311932023-02-16 A nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy Zhong, Chonghan Ju, Houqiong Liu, Dongning He, Penghui Wang, Daqiang Yu, Hongxin Lu, Weijie Li, Taiyuan Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed data collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. In addition, in a 7:3 randomized design, all patients were split into two groups (development and validation cohorts). CSS predictors were selected via univariate and multivariate Cox regressions. The nomogram was constructed by analyzing univariate and multivariate predictors. The effectiveness of this nomogram was evaluated by concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Based on the total score of each patient in the development cohort in the nomogram, a risk stratification system was developed. In order to analyze the survival outcomes among different risk groups, Kaplan–Meier method was used. RESULTS: We selected 4,310 lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy, including a development cohort (70%, 3,017) and a validation cohort (30%, 1,293). The nomogram correlation C-index for the development cohort and the validation cohort was 0.702 (95% CI, 0.687–0.717) and 0.690 (95% CI, 0.665–0.715), respectively. The calibration curves for 3- and 5-year CSS showed great concordance. The 3- and 5-year areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC curves in the development cohort were 0.758 and 0.740, respectively, and 0.735 and 0.730 in the validation cohort, respectively. Following the establishment of the nomogram, we also established a risk stratification system. According to their nomogram total points, patients were divided into three risk groups. There were significant differences between the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As a result of our research, we developed a highly discriminatory and accurate nomogram and associated risk classification system to predict CSS in lymph-node- positive rectal cancer patients after radical proctectomy. This model can help predict the prognosis of patients with lymph- node- positive rectal cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9931193/ /pubmed/36816958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1120960 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhong, Ju, Liu, He, Wang, Yu, Lu and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhong, Chonghan
Ju, Houqiong
Liu, Dongning
He, Penghui
Wang, Daqiang
Yu, Hongxin
Lu, Weijie
Li, Taiyuan
A nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy
title A nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy
title_full A nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy
title_fullStr A nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy
title_full_unstemmed A nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy
title_short A nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy
title_sort nomogram and risk classification system forecasting the cancer-specific survival of lymph- node- positive rectal cancer patient after radical proctectomy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1120960
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongchonghan anomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT juhouqiong anomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT liudongning anomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT hepenghui anomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT wangdaqiang anomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT yuhongxin anomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT luweijie anomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT litaiyuan anomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT zhongchonghan nomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT juhouqiong nomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT liudongning nomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT hepenghui nomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT wangdaqiang nomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT yuhongxin nomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT luweijie nomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy
AT litaiyuan nomogramandriskclassificationsystemforecastingthecancerspecificsurvivaloflymphnodepositiverectalcancerpatientafterradicalproctectomy