Cargando…
Understanding the impact of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic
Digital contact tracing (DCT) applications have been introduced in many countries to aid the containment of COVID-19 outbreaks. Initially, enthusiasm was high regarding their implementation as a non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI). However, no country was able to prevent larger outbreaks without f...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36812611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000149 |
_version_ | 1784889223668563968 |
---|---|
author | Burdinski, Angelique Brockmann, Dirk Maier, Benjamin Frank |
author_facet | Burdinski, Angelique Brockmann, Dirk Maier, Benjamin Frank |
author_sort | Burdinski, Angelique |
collection | PubMed |
description | Digital contact tracing (DCT) applications have been introduced in many countries to aid the containment of COVID-19 outbreaks. Initially, enthusiasm was high regarding their implementation as a non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI). However, no country was able to prevent larger outbreaks without falling back to harsher NPIs. Here, we discuss results of a stochastic infectious-disease model that provide insights in how the progression of an outbreak and key parameters such as detection probability, app participation and its distribution, as well as engagement of users impact DCT efficacy informed by results of empirical studies. We further show how contact heterogeneity and local contact clustering impact the intervention’s efficacy. We conclude that DCT apps might have prevented cases on the order of single-digit percentages during single outbreaks for empirically plausible ranges of parameters, ignoring that a substantial part of these contacts would have been identified by manual contact tracing. This result is generally robust against changes in network topology with exceptions for homogeneous-degree, locally-clustered contact networks, on which the intervention prevents more infections. An improvement of efficacy is similarly observed when app participation is highly clustered. We find that DCT typically averts more cases during the super-critical phase of an epidemic when case counts are rising and the measured efficacy therefore depends on the time of evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9931320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99313202023-02-16 Understanding the impact of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic Burdinski, Angelique Brockmann, Dirk Maier, Benjamin Frank PLOS Digit Health Research Article Digital contact tracing (DCT) applications have been introduced in many countries to aid the containment of COVID-19 outbreaks. Initially, enthusiasm was high regarding their implementation as a non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI). However, no country was able to prevent larger outbreaks without falling back to harsher NPIs. Here, we discuss results of a stochastic infectious-disease model that provide insights in how the progression of an outbreak and key parameters such as detection probability, app participation and its distribution, as well as engagement of users impact DCT efficacy informed by results of empirical studies. We further show how contact heterogeneity and local contact clustering impact the intervention’s efficacy. We conclude that DCT apps might have prevented cases on the order of single-digit percentages during single outbreaks for empirically plausible ranges of parameters, ignoring that a substantial part of these contacts would have been identified by manual contact tracing. This result is generally robust against changes in network topology with exceptions for homogeneous-degree, locally-clustered contact networks, on which the intervention prevents more infections. An improvement of efficacy is similarly observed when app participation is highly clustered. We find that DCT typically averts more cases during the super-critical phase of an epidemic when case counts are rising and the measured efficacy therefore depends on the time of evaluation. Public Library of Science 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9931320/ /pubmed/36812611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000149 Text en © 2022 Burdinski et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Burdinski, Angelique Brockmann, Dirk Maier, Benjamin Frank Understanding the impact of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Understanding the impact of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Understanding the impact of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Understanding the impact of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding the impact of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Understanding the impact of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | understanding the impact of digital contact tracing during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36812611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burdinskiangelique understandingtheimpactofdigitalcontacttracingduringthecovid19pandemic AT brockmanndirk understandingtheimpactofdigitalcontacttracingduringthecovid19pandemic AT maierbenjaminfrank understandingtheimpactofdigitalcontacttracingduringthecovid19pandemic |