Cargando…

Digital health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Good blood glucose control is important to reduce the risk of adverse effects on mothers and their offspring in women with gestational diabetes (GDM). This review examined the impact of using digital health interventions on reported glycaemic control among pregnant women with GDM and its impact on m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leblalta, Boutheina, Kebaili, Hanane, Sim, Ruth, Lee, Shaun Wen Huey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36812531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000015
_version_ 1784889227084824576
author Leblalta, Boutheina
Kebaili, Hanane
Sim, Ruth
Lee, Shaun Wen Huey
author_facet Leblalta, Boutheina
Kebaili, Hanane
Sim, Ruth
Lee, Shaun Wen Huey
author_sort Leblalta, Boutheina
collection PubMed
description Good blood glucose control is important to reduce the risk of adverse effects on mothers and their offspring in women with gestational diabetes (GDM). This review examined the impact of using digital health interventions on reported glycaemic control among pregnant women with GDM and its impact on maternal and foetal outcomes. Seven databases were searched from database inception to October 31(st), 2021 for randomised controlled trials that examined digital health interventions to provide services remotely for women with GDM. Two authors independently screened and assessed the studies for eligibility for inclusion. Risk of bias was independently assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. Studies were pooled using random effects model and presented as risk ratio or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE framework. Twenty-eight randomised controlled trials that examined digital health interventions in 3,228 pregnant women with GDM were included. Moderate certainty of evidence showed that digital health interventions improved glycaemic control among pregnant women, with lower fasting plasma glucose (mean difference -0.33 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.07), 2-hour post-prandial glucose (-0.49 mmol/L; -0.83 to -0.15) and HbA1c (-0.36%; -0.65 to -0.07). Among those randomised to digital health interventions, there was a lower need for caesarean delivery (Relative risk: 0.81; 0.69 to 0.95; high certainty) and foetal macrosomia (0.67; 0.48 to 0.95; high certainty). Other maternal and foetal outcomes were not significantly different between both groups. Moderate to high certainty evidence support the use of digital health interventions, as these appear to improve glycaemic control and reduce the need for caesarean delivery. However, more robust evidence is needed before it can be offered as a choice to supplement or replace clinic follow up. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42016043009.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9931335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99313352023-02-16 Digital health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Leblalta, Boutheina Kebaili, Hanane Sim, Ruth Lee, Shaun Wen Huey PLOS Digit Health Research Article Good blood glucose control is important to reduce the risk of adverse effects on mothers and their offspring in women with gestational diabetes (GDM). This review examined the impact of using digital health interventions on reported glycaemic control among pregnant women with GDM and its impact on maternal and foetal outcomes. Seven databases were searched from database inception to October 31(st), 2021 for randomised controlled trials that examined digital health interventions to provide services remotely for women with GDM. Two authors independently screened and assessed the studies for eligibility for inclusion. Risk of bias was independently assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. Studies were pooled using random effects model and presented as risk ratio or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE framework. Twenty-eight randomised controlled trials that examined digital health interventions in 3,228 pregnant women with GDM were included. Moderate certainty of evidence showed that digital health interventions improved glycaemic control among pregnant women, with lower fasting plasma glucose (mean difference -0.33 mmol/L; 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.07), 2-hour post-prandial glucose (-0.49 mmol/L; -0.83 to -0.15) and HbA1c (-0.36%; -0.65 to -0.07). Among those randomised to digital health interventions, there was a lower need for caesarean delivery (Relative risk: 0.81; 0.69 to 0.95; high certainty) and foetal macrosomia (0.67; 0.48 to 0.95; high certainty). Other maternal and foetal outcomes were not significantly different between both groups. Moderate to high certainty evidence support the use of digital health interventions, as these appear to improve glycaemic control and reduce the need for caesarean delivery. However, more robust evidence is needed before it can be offered as a choice to supplement or replace clinic follow up. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42016043009. Public Library of Science 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9931335/ /pubmed/36812531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000015 Text en © 2022 Leblalta et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leblalta, Boutheina
Kebaili, Hanane
Sim, Ruth
Lee, Shaun Wen Huey
Digital health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title Digital health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Digital health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Digital health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Digital health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Digital health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort digital health interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36812531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000015
work_keys_str_mv AT leblaltaboutheina digitalhealthinterventionsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT kebailihanane digitalhealthinterventionsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT simruth digitalhealthinterventionsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT leeshaunwenhuey digitalhealthinterventionsforgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials