A Systematic Review of Scoring System Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters to Predict Outcome in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a potential tool for the objective assessment of spinal cord injury (SCI) because it correlates well with the spatial and temporal extension of spinal cord pathology. This study aimed to systematically identify currently available scoring system based on MRI parameters, including measurement of the spinal cord lesion length in sagittal view (intramedullary lesion length (IMLL)) and morphology of the lesion in axial view (Brain and Spinal Injury Center (BASIC) score). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE database for English-language studies with the keywords “cervical,” “spinal cord injury,” “scoring system,” “scoring,” “classification,” and “magnetic resonance imaging” to systematically identify the scoring system based on MRI parameters. The main outcomes of interest are the scoring system's inter- and intraobserver reliabilities and its predictive accuracy of neurological outcome. RESULTS: After assessing the full text and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 13 articles were found to be eligible. The inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were rated as good until perfect for increased signal intensity (ISI), maximum canal compromise (MCC), maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC), BASIC score, cord-canal-area ratio, space available for the cord, and the compression ratio. The weighted mean difference of IML between the group with converted ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade and the group without conversion is 31.79 (I(2)=93%, P=0.008). The percentage of agreement between the initial BASIC score of 4 with AIS grade of A at follow-up is 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Certain MRI parameters, including IML and BASIC score, have good reliability and correlate well with neurological outcome, making them candidates for building simple and objective scoring system for cervical SCI. Level of Evidence: 2A