Cargando…

Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders

INTRODUCTION: Since 2015, we have performed minimally invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5/S1 for various lumbosacral spine disorders using percutaneous pedicle screws. This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic results between OLIF at L5/S1 and minimally invasive transforami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotani, Yoshihisa, Ikeura, Atsushi, Saito, Takanori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819631
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0028
_version_ 1784889242623672320
author Kotani, Yoshihisa
Ikeura, Atsushi
Saito, Takanori
author_facet Kotani, Yoshihisa
Ikeura, Atsushi
Saito, Takanori
author_sort Kotani, Yoshihisa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Since 2015, we have performed minimally invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5/S1 for various lumbosacral spine disorders using percutaneous pedicle screws. This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic results between OLIF at L5/S1 and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single to multilevel degenerative lumbosacral disorders. METHODS: A total of 124 patients underwent either OLIF (62 cases) or MIS-TLIF (62 cases). The applied disorders were L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis, foraminal stenosis, pseudarthrosis, adjacent segment degeneration, a combination of L4/5 and L5/S1 pathology, and others. We performed OLIF with posterior percutaneous fixation in the same lateral position. MIS-TLIF was performed with modified cortical bone trajectory screws. The operation time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), JOABPEQ effectiveness rate (%),Visual Analog Scale (VAS), fusion rate, radiologic segmental alignment, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The average follow-up periods were 51 and 69 months (24-95) in the OLIF and MIS-TLIF groups, respectively. Furthermore, the average fused segments were 1.6 and 1.5 in each group, respectively. The OT and EBL per segment were 130 min and 56 mL and 100 min and 64 mL, respectively. The JOABPEQ effectiveness rate in the OLIF group demonstrated a statistically higher value in the domains of pain, low-back function, and gait than the MIS-TLIF group (P<0.01). The follow-up VAS of low-back pain (LBP) and lower extremity numbness had lower values in the OLIF group (P<0.05). The fusion rates were 98% and 90%, respectively. Segmental lordosis at L5/S1 was significantly larger in the OLIF group (15° vs. 11°, P<0.01) CONCLUSIONS: The OLIF group demonstrated less pain as well as better low-back and gait functions at follow-up. The minimally invasive anterolateral fusion employing OLIF at L5/S1 using percutaneous screws serves as a viable and effective procedure with less residual LBP and high fusion rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9931403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99314032023-02-16 Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders Kotani, Yoshihisa Ikeura, Atsushi Saito, Takanori Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Since 2015, we have performed minimally invasive oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5/S1 for various lumbosacral spine disorders using percutaneous pedicle screws. This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic results between OLIF at L5/S1 and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single to multilevel degenerative lumbosacral disorders. METHODS: A total of 124 patients underwent either OLIF (62 cases) or MIS-TLIF (62 cases). The applied disorders were L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis, foraminal stenosis, pseudarthrosis, adjacent segment degeneration, a combination of L4/5 and L5/S1 pathology, and others. We performed OLIF with posterior percutaneous fixation in the same lateral position. MIS-TLIF was performed with modified cortical bone trajectory screws. The operation time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), JOABPEQ effectiveness rate (%),Visual Analog Scale (VAS), fusion rate, radiologic segmental alignment, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The average follow-up periods were 51 and 69 months (24-95) in the OLIF and MIS-TLIF groups, respectively. Furthermore, the average fused segments were 1.6 and 1.5 in each group, respectively. The OT and EBL per segment were 130 min and 56 mL and 100 min and 64 mL, respectively. The JOABPEQ effectiveness rate in the OLIF group demonstrated a statistically higher value in the domains of pain, low-back function, and gait than the MIS-TLIF group (P<0.01). The follow-up VAS of low-back pain (LBP) and lower extremity numbness had lower values in the OLIF group (P<0.05). The fusion rates were 98% and 90%, respectively. Segmental lordosis at L5/S1 was significantly larger in the OLIF group (15° vs. 11°, P<0.01) CONCLUSIONS: The OLIF group demonstrated less pain as well as better low-back and gait functions at follow-up. The minimally invasive anterolateral fusion employing OLIF at L5/S1 using percutaneous screws serves as a viable and effective procedure with less residual LBP and high fusion rate. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9931403/ /pubmed/36819631 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0028 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kotani, Yoshihisa
Ikeura, Atsushi
Saito, Takanori
Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders
title Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders
title_full Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders
title_fullStr Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders
title_short Comparative Clinical Analysis of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbosacral Disorders
title_sort comparative clinical analysis of oblique lateral interbody fusion at l5/s1 versus minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (mis-tlif) for degenerative lumbosacral disorders
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819631
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0028
work_keys_str_mv AT kotaniyoshihisa comparativeclinicalanalysisofobliquelateralinterbodyfusionatl5s1versusminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionmistliffordegenerativelumbosacraldisorders
AT ikeuraatsushi comparativeclinicalanalysisofobliquelateralinterbodyfusionatl5s1versusminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionmistliffordegenerativelumbosacraldisorders
AT saitotakanori comparativeclinicalanalysisofobliquelateralinterbodyfusionatl5s1versusminimallyinvasivetransforaminalinterbodyfusionmistliffordegenerativelumbosacraldisorders