Cargando…

Comparison between Decompression Alone and with Additional Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis affects approximately 10% of adults over 40. Although decompression has been the treatment of choice, some surgeons note possible instability development after decompression alone (D). Previous studies show that decompression with fusion (DF) has s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arimbawa, Ida Bagus Gede, Pranata, Cokorda Gde Rama Adi, Daniati, Sonia, Putra, Made Winatra Satya, Savio, Sherly Desnita, Wiguna, I Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha, Ridia, Ketut Gede Mulyadi, Suyasa, I Ketut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819637
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0011
_version_ 1784889244567732224
author Arimbawa, Ida Bagus Gede
Pranata, Cokorda Gde Rama Adi
Daniati, Sonia
Putra, Made Winatra Satya
Savio, Sherly Desnita
Wiguna, I Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha
Ridia, Ketut Gede Mulyadi
Suyasa, I Ketut
author_facet Arimbawa, Ida Bagus Gede
Pranata, Cokorda Gde Rama Adi
Daniati, Sonia
Putra, Made Winatra Satya
Savio, Sherly Desnita
Wiguna, I Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha
Ridia, Ketut Gede Mulyadi
Suyasa, I Ketut
author_sort Arimbawa, Ida Bagus Gede
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis affects approximately 10% of adults over 40. Although decompression has been the treatment of choice, some surgeons note possible instability development after decompression alone (D). Previous studies show that decompression with fusion (DF) has similar complication rates but is better at preventing slip progression and reducing pain. However, others stated the additional instrumentation does not result in superior functional outcomes and has higher costs and complication rates. This study aims to provide an objective, two-arm comparison of the two treatments using systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The study design was a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized comparative studies. A systematic search was conducted from April 2021 to September 2021 to identify relevant studies using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases based on PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: This systematic review included 8 studies (6,669 patients); 7 (6,569 patients) were included in the meta-analysis, with a follow-up period of up to 143 months. The most commonly affected level was L4-5, with females being more affected than males. Visual Analog Scale improvement on back pain was significantly better in DF group (Heterogeneity, I(2)=32%; WMD −0.72; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), −1.35 to −0.08; P=0.03), as well as postoperative back pain (I(2)=96%; WMD 0.87; 95% CI, 0.19 to 1.55; P=0.01). The leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), satisfaction rate, complication rate, and revision rate were comparable between the two procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Current systematic review and meta-analysis proved that DF is better than D in terms of back pain improvement, and the two procedures are comparable in terms of leg pain, ODI, satisfaction rate, complication rate, and revision rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9931411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99314112023-02-16 Comparison between Decompression Alone and with Additional Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Arimbawa, Ida Bagus Gede Pranata, Cokorda Gde Rama Adi Daniati, Sonia Putra, Made Winatra Satya Savio, Sherly Desnita Wiguna, I Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha Ridia, Ketut Gede Mulyadi Suyasa, I Ketut Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis affects approximately 10% of adults over 40. Although decompression has been the treatment of choice, some surgeons note possible instability development after decompression alone (D). Previous studies show that decompression with fusion (DF) has similar complication rates but is better at preventing slip progression and reducing pain. However, others stated the additional instrumentation does not result in superior functional outcomes and has higher costs and complication rates. This study aims to provide an objective, two-arm comparison of the two treatments using systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The study design was a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized comparative studies. A systematic search was conducted from April 2021 to September 2021 to identify relevant studies using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases based on PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: This systematic review included 8 studies (6,669 patients); 7 (6,569 patients) were included in the meta-analysis, with a follow-up period of up to 143 months. The most commonly affected level was L4-5, with females being more affected than males. Visual Analog Scale improvement on back pain was significantly better in DF group (Heterogeneity, I(2)=32%; WMD −0.72; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), −1.35 to −0.08; P=0.03), as well as postoperative back pain (I(2)=96%; WMD 0.87; 95% CI, 0.19 to 1.55; P=0.01). The leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), satisfaction rate, complication rate, and revision rate were comparable between the two procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Current systematic review and meta-analysis proved that DF is better than D in terms of back pain improvement, and the two procedures are comparable in terms of leg pain, ODI, satisfaction rate, complication rate, and revision rate. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9931411/ /pubmed/36819637 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0011 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Arimbawa, Ida Bagus Gede
Pranata, Cokorda Gde Rama Adi
Daniati, Sonia
Putra, Made Winatra Satya
Savio, Sherly Desnita
Wiguna, I Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha
Ridia, Ketut Gede Mulyadi
Suyasa, I Ketut
Comparison between Decompression Alone and with Additional Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparison between Decompression Alone and with Additional Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison between Decompression Alone and with Additional Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison between Decompression Alone and with Additional Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Decompression Alone and with Additional Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison between Decompression Alone and with Additional Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison between decompression alone and with additional fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819637
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0011
work_keys_str_mv AT arimbawaidabagusgede comparisonbetweendecompressionaloneandwithadditionalfusionfordegenerativelumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pranatacokordagderamaadi comparisonbetweendecompressionaloneandwithadditionalfusionfordegenerativelumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daniatisonia comparisonbetweendecompressionaloneandwithadditionalfusionfordegenerativelumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT putramadewinatrasatya comparisonbetweendecompressionaloneandwithadditionalfusionfordegenerativelumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saviosherlydesnita comparisonbetweendecompressionaloneandwithadditionalfusionfordegenerativelumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wigunaigustilanangngurahagungartha comparisonbetweendecompressionaloneandwithadditionalfusionfordegenerativelumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ridiaketutgedemulyadi comparisonbetweendecompressionaloneandwithadditionalfusionfordegenerativelumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suyasaiketut comparisonbetweendecompressionaloneandwithadditionalfusionfordegenerativelumbarspondylolisthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis