Cargando…

Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery

OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency coblation (RFC) is a relatively new method that has opened up new perspectives in treating oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our study was designed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of RFC-assisted transoral surgery (RFC-TOS) for primary OPSCC. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Xiaowan, Zhao, Xin, Zhang, Junbo, Zhang, Chi, Xiao, Shuifang, Li, Tiancheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7487306
_version_ 1784889259155521536
author Du, Xiaowan
Zhao, Xin
Zhang, Junbo
Zhang, Chi
Xiao, Shuifang
Li, Tiancheng
author_facet Du, Xiaowan
Zhao, Xin
Zhang, Junbo
Zhang, Chi
Xiao, Shuifang
Li, Tiancheng
author_sort Du, Xiaowan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency coblation (RFC) is a relatively new method that has opened up new perspectives in treating oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our study was designed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of RFC-assisted transoral surgery (RFC-TOS) for primary OPSCC. METHODS: Sixty-nine cases of OPSCC from February 2005 to November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 31 in the RFC-TOS group and 38 in the open surgery group. No difference was observed in demographic and oncological characteristics. RESULTS: The significance between the RFC-TOS group and the open surgery group was proved in intraoperative bleeding volume (34.10 ± 10.10 ml vs. 193.68 ± 21.00 ml, P < 0.001), durations of surgery (79.58 ± 8.45 min vs. 217.87 ± 17.65 min, P < 0.001), time to resume oral feeding (1.64 ± 0.41 d vs. 11.58 ± 1.41 d, P < 0.001), duration of hospitalization (7.84 ± 0.66 d vs. 15.66 ± 1.62 d, P < 0.001), and the total costs (22846.22 ± 1821.55¥ vs. 41792.24 ± 4150.86¥, P < 0.001). The rates of 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-yeardisease-specific survival (DSS), and 5-year local control rate (LC) were 69.1%, 71.7%, and 75.7%, respectively, in the RFC-TOS group and 71.0%, 73.4%, and 73.7% in the open surgery group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RFC-TOS is a feasible alternative transoral approach for OPSCC. The reported perioperative and oncologic outcomes are satisfactory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9931478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99314782023-02-16 Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery Du, Xiaowan Zhao, Xin Zhang, Junbo Zhang, Chi Xiao, Shuifang Li, Tiancheng J Oncol Research Article OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency coblation (RFC) is a relatively new method that has opened up new perspectives in treating oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our study was designed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of RFC-assisted transoral surgery (RFC-TOS) for primary OPSCC. METHODS: Sixty-nine cases of OPSCC from February 2005 to November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 31 in the RFC-TOS group and 38 in the open surgery group. No difference was observed in demographic and oncological characteristics. RESULTS: The significance between the RFC-TOS group and the open surgery group was proved in intraoperative bleeding volume (34.10 ± 10.10 ml vs. 193.68 ± 21.00 ml, P < 0.001), durations of surgery (79.58 ± 8.45 min vs. 217.87 ± 17.65 min, P < 0.001), time to resume oral feeding (1.64 ± 0.41 d vs. 11.58 ± 1.41 d, P < 0.001), duration of hospitalization (7.84 ± 0.66 d vs. 15.66 ± 1.62 d, P < 0.001), and the total costs (22846.22 ± 1821.55¥ vs. 41792.24 ± 4150.86¥, P < 0.001). The rates of 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-yeardisease-specific survival (DSS), and 5-year local control rate (LC) were 69.1%, 71.7%, and 75.7%, respectively, in the RFC-TOS group and 71.0%, 73.4%, and 73.7% in the open surgery group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RFC-TOS is a feasible alternative transoral approach for OPSCC. The reported perioperative and oncologic outcomes are satisfactory. Hindawi 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9931478/ /pubmed/36816366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7487306 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xiaowan Du et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Du, Xiaowan
Zhao, Xin
Zhang, Junbo
Zhang, Chi
Xiao, Shuifang
Li, Tiancheng
Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery
title Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery
title_full Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery
title_fullStr Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery
title_short Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery
title_sort radiofrequency coblation-assisted transoral surgery for the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative study with open surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7487306
work_keys_str_mv AT duxiaowan radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery
AT zhaoxin radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery
AT zhangjunbo radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery
AT zhangchi radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery
AT xiaoshuifang radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery
AT litiancheng radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery