Cargando…
Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery
OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency coblation (RFC) is a relatively new method that has opened up new perspectives in treating oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our study was designed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of RFC-assisted transoral surgery (RFC-TOS) for primary OPSCC. METHO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7487306 |
_version_ | 1784889259155521536 |
---|---|
author | Du, Xiaowan Zhao, Xin Zhang, Junbo Zhang, Chi Xiao, Shuifang Li, Tiancheng |
author_facet | Du, Xiaowan Zhao, Xin Zhang, Junbo Zhang, Chi Xiao, Shuifang Li, Tiancheng |
author_sort | Du, Xiaowan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency coblation (RFC) is a relatively new method that has opened up new perspectives in treating oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our study was designed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of RFC-assisted transoral surgery (RFC-TOS) for primary OPSCC. METHODS: Sixty-nine cases of OPSCC from February 2005 to November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 31 in the RFC-TOS group and 38 in the open surgery group. No difference was observed in demographic and oncological characteristics. RESULTS: The significance between the RFC-TOS group and the open surgery group was proved in intraoperative bleeding volume (34.10 ± 10.10 ml vs. 193.68 ± 21.00 ml, P < 0.001), durations of surgery (79.58 ± 8.45 min vs. 217.87 ± 17.65 min, P < 0.001), time to resume oral feeding (1.64 ± 0.41 d vs. 11.58 ± 1.41 d, P < 0.001), duration of hospitalization (7.84 ± 0.66 d vs. 15.66 ± 1.62 d, P < 0.001), and the total costs (22846.22 ± 1821.55¥ vs. 41792.24 ± 4150.86¥, P < 0.001). The rates of 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-yeardisease-specific survival (DSS), and 5-year local control rate (LC) were 69.1%, 71.7%, and 75.7%, respectively, in the RFC-TOS group and 71.0%, 73.4%, and 73.7% in the open surgery group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RFC-TOS is a feasible alternative transoral approach for OPSCC. The reported perioperative and oncologic outcomes are satisfactory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9931478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99314782023-02-16 Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery Du, Xiaowan Zhao, Xin Zhang, Junbo Zhang, Chi Xiao, Shuifang Li, Tiancheng J Oncol Research Article OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency coblation (RFC) is a relatively new method that has opened up new perspectives in treating oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our study was designed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of RFC-assisted transoral surgery (RFC-TOS) for primary OPSCC. METHODS: Sixty-nine cases of OPSCC from February 2005 to November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 31 in the RFC-TOS group and 38 in the open surgery group. No difference was observed in demographic and oncological characteristics. RESULTS: The significance between the RFC-TOS group and the open surgery group was proved in intraoperative bleeding volume (34.10 ± 10.10 ml vs. 193.68 ± 21.00 ml, P < 0.001), durations of surgery (79.58 ± 8.45 min vs. 217.87 ± 17.65 min, P < 0.001), time to resume oral feeding (1.64 ± 0.41 d vs. 11.58 ± 1.41 d, P < 0.001), duration of hospitalization (7.84 ± 0.66 d vs. 15.66 ± 1.62 d, P < 0.001), and the total costs (22846.22 ± 1821.55¥ vs. 41792.24 ± 4150.86¥, P < 0.001). The rates of 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-yeardisease-specific survival (DSS), and 5-year local control rate (LC) were 69.1%, 71.7%, and 75.7%, respectively, in the RFC-TOS group and 71.0%, 73.4%, and 73.7% in the open surgery group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RFC-TOS is a feasible alternative transoral approach for OPSCC. The reported perioperative and oncologic outcomes are satisfactory. Hindawi 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9931478/ /pubmed/36816366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7487306 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xiaowan Du et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Du, Xiaowan Zhao, Xin Zhang, Junbo Zhang, Chi Xiao, Shuifang Li, Tiancheng Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery |
title | Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery |
title_full | Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery |
title_fullStr | Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery |
title_short | Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Transoral Surgery for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study with Open Surgery |
title_sort | radiofrequency coblation-assisted transoral surgery for the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative study with open surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7487306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duxiaowan radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery AT zhaoxin radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery AT zhangjunbo radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery AT zhangchi radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery AT xiaoshuifang radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery AT litiancheng radiofrequencycoblationassistedtransoralsurgeryforthetreatmentoforopharyngealsquamouscellcarcinomaacomparativestudywithopensurgery |