Cargando…

The highest percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 is a predictor in intermediate‐risk prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to clarify the clinicopathological significance of several novel pathological markers, including the percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and small/non‐small cribriform pattern, in intermediate‐risk Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two‐hundred and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Sato, Shun, Kimura, Takahiro, Onuma, Hajime, Egawa, Shin, Shimoda, Masayuki, Takahashi, Hiroyuki
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:	Original Articles
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.195

Ejemplares similares

Transition zone prostate cancer is associated with better clinical outcomes than peripheral zone cancer
por: Sato, Shun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Global Trends of Latent Prostate Cancer in Autopsy Studies
por: Kimura, Takahiro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Percent Gleason pattern 4 in stratifying the prognosis of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer
por: Sharma, Meenal, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6
por: Oh, Jong Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer
por: Mori, Keiichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Do androgen deprivation and the biologically equivalent dose matter in low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy for intermediate‐risk prostate cancer?
por: Tabata, Ryuji, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Overall and worst gleason scores are equally good predictors of prostate cancer progression
por: Tolonen, Teemu T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Influence of Active Surveillance on Gleason Score Upgrade and Prognosis in Low- and Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
por: Hu, Xuanhan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

ASO Author Reflections: Is There Any Difference Among Various Gleason Scores Classified as Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer?
por: Mori, Keiichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?
por: Chung, Mun Su, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Clinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer
por: Hassan, Oudai, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 at MRI-Guided Biopsy to Predict Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
por: Kamecki, Hubert, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Biochemical Recurrence in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer in Korean Men: Significance of the Primary Gleason Grade
por: Ro, Yun Kwan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Repair of Inguinal Bladder Hernias Concomitant with Localized Prostate Cancer: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
por: Hata, Kenichi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The gut microbiota associated with high‐Gleason prostate cancer
por: Matsushita, Makoto, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Gleason 6 prostate cancer: That which cannot be named
por: Burke, Harry B.
Publicado: (2022)

Influence of Biopsy Gleason Score on the Risk of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of Gleason Pattern 5 on outcomes of patients with prostate cancer and iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy
por: Makino, Tomoyuki, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Differences in survival of prostate cancer Gleason 8–10 disease and the establishment of a new Gleason survival grading system
por: Zhou, Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Assessment of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values as Predictor of Aggressiveness in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer: Comparison with Gleason Score
por: Anwar, Shayan Sirat Maheen, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Intermediate levels of asymptomatic transmission can lead to the highest epidemic fatalities
por: Park, Sang Woo, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma
por: Rao, Vishal, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Multimodal Radiomic Features for the Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer
por: Chaddad, Ahmad, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Beyond the Gleason score: the prognostic significance of prostate cancer subtypes
por: Flood, Trevor A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Expression of stromal elements of prostatic adenocarcinoma in different gleason scores
por: Osorio, Clarice Fraga Esteves Maciel, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies
por: Lucas, Marit, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Ability of Prostate Health Index (PHI) to Predict Gleason Score in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Discriminate Patients Between Gleason Score 6 and Gleason Score Higher Than 6—A Study on 320 Patients After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Dolejsova, Olga, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
por: Taguchi, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy primary Gleason score to predict biochemical failure in patients with intermediate prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy
por: Peng, Chao, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Leng, Yi-Hsueh, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The values of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and/or prostate-specific antigen in discriminating real Gleason score ≥ 7 prostate cancer from group of biopsy-based Gleason score ≤ 6
por: Wang, Hanfeng, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Osteoblast‐derived extracellular vesicles exert osteoblastic and tumor‐suppressive functions via SERPINA3 and LCN2 in prostate cancer
por: Ito, Kagenori, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Low income countries have the highest percentages of open access publication: A systematic computational analysis of the biomedical literature
por: Iyandemye, Jonathan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Correlation of Gleason Scores with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer
por: Nagarajan, Rajakumar, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Correlation of concentrations of selected trace elements with Gleason grade of prostate tissues
por: Banas, A., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis
por: Chaddad, Ahmad, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Pelvic nodal radiotherapy in Gleason grade group 5 prostate cancer
por: Cook, Kiri, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

MYC DNA Methylation in Prostate Tumor Tissue is Associated with Gleason Score
por: Barry, Kathryn Hughes, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_6t8p4qcikhkb76tpbhq7csbkj0