Cargando…

Accuracy of prostate cancer screening recommendations for high‐risk populations on YouTube and TikTok

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate content quality and racial/ethnic representation, particularly of high‐risk cohorts, of prostate cancer screening videos on YouTube (YT) and TikTok (TK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The top 50 videos populated for the search term ‘prostate cancer screening’ on YT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abramson, Max, Feiertag, Nathan, Javidi, Darius, Babar, Mustufa, Loeb, Stacy, Watts, Kara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.200
_version_ 1784889270970875904
author Abramson, Max
Feiertag, Nathan
Javidi, Darius
Babar, Mustufa
Loeb, Stacy
Watts, Kara
author_facet Abramson, Max
Feiertag, Nathan
Javidi, Darius
Babar, Mustufa
Loeb, Stacy
Watts, Kara
author_sort Abramson, Max
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate content quality and racial/ethnic representation, particularly of high‐risk cohorts, of prostate cancer screening videos on YouTube (YT) and TikTok (TK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The top 50 videos populated for the search term ‘prostate cancer screening’ on YT and TK that met inclusion criteria were retrieved in a cache‐cleared browser. Three reviewers analysed all videos using validated criteria for the quality of consumer health information (DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool [PEMAT]). High quality was defined as follows: DISCERN ≥ 4, PEMAT understandability ≥75% and PEMAT actionability ≥75%. A 5‐point Likert scale was used to demonstrate the level of misinformation compared to American Urological Association and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Perceived race and ethnicity of people in the videos were assessed by consensus approach. RESULTS: TK videos were shorter (median 3.7 vs. 0.5 min, p < 0.001) and had more views per month (5437.5 vs. 19.3, p = 0.03) than YT videos. Perceived Black and Hispanic representation was present in 10% and 6% of YT videos and 20% and 12% of TK videos, respectively. High‐risk racial/ethnic groups were explicitly discussed in 46% of YT videos and 8% of TK videos. A total of 98% of YT videos and 100% of TK videos had low‐ to moderate‐quality consumer health information, and 88% of YT videos and 100% of TK videos had moderate to high levels of misinformation based on screening guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: YT and TK videos about prostate cancer screening are widely viewed but do not provide quality consumer health information. Black and Hispanic men remain under‐represented on both platforms, and high‐risk racial groups were not discussed in most videos despite the importance for screening criteria. The low understandability and actionability, significant misinformation and lack of diversity in online videos support the need for higher quality videos with adequate attention to high‐risk ethnic cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9931542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99315422023-02-17 Accuracy of prostate cancer screening recommendations for high‐risk populations on YouTube and TikTok Abramson, Max Feiertag, Nathan Javidi, Darius Babar, Mustufa Loeb, Stacy Watts, Kara BJUI Compass Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate content quality and racial/ethnic representation, particularly of high‐risk cohorts, of prostate cancer screening videos on YouTube (YT) and TikTok (TK). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The top 50 videos populated for the search term ‘prostate cancer screening’ on YT and TK that met inclusion criteria were retrieved in a cache‐cleared browser. Three reviewers analysed all videos using validated criteria for the quality of consumer health information (DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool [PEMAT]). High quality was defined as follows: DISCERN ≥ 4, PEMAT understandability ≥75% and PEMAT actionability ≥75%. A 5‐point Likert scale was used to demonstrate the level of misinformation compared to American Urological Association and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Perceived race and ethnicity of people in the videos were assessed by consensus approach. RESULTS: TK videos were shorter (median 3.7 vs. 0.5 min, p < 0.001) and had more views per month (5437.5 vs. 19.3, p = 0.03) than YT videos. Perceived Black and Hispanic representation was present in 10% and 6% of YT videos and 20% and 12% of TK videos, respectively. High‐risk racial/ethnic groups were explicitly discussed in 46% of YT videos and 8% of TK videos. A total of 98% of YT videos and 100% of TK videos had low‐ to moderate‐quality consumer health information, and 88% of YT videos and 100% of TK videos had moderate to high levels of misinformation based on screening guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: YT and TK videos about prostate cancer screening are widely viewed but do not provide quality consumer health information. Black and Hispanic men remain under‐represented on both platforms, and high‐risk racial groups were not discussed in most videos despite the importance for screening criteria. The low understandability and actionability, significant misinformation and lack of diversity in online videos support the need for higher quality videos with adequate attention to high‐risk ethnic cohorts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9931542/ /pubmed/36816146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.200 Text en © 2022 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Abramson, Max
Feiertag, Nathan
Javidi, Darius
Babar, Mustufa
Loeb, Stacy
Watts, Kara
Accuracy of prostate cancer screening recommendations for high‐risk populations on YouTube and TikTok
title Accuracy of prostate cancer screening recommendations for high‐risk populations on YouTube and TikTok
title_full Accuracy of prostate cancer screening recommendations for high‐risk populations on YouTube and TikTok
title_fullStr Accuracy of prostate cancer screening recommendations for high‐risk populations on YouTube and TikTok
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of prostate cancer screening recommendations for high‐risk populations on YouTube and TikTok
title_short Accuracy of prostate cancer screening recommendations for high‐risk populations on YouTube and TikTok
title_sort accuracy of prostate cancer screening recommendations for high‐risk populations on youtube and tiktok
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.200
work_keys_str_mv AT abramsonmax accuracyofprostatecancerscreeningrecommendationsforhighriskpopulationsonyoutubeandtiktok
AT feiertagnathan accuracyofprostatecancerscreeningrecommendationsforhighriskpopulationsonyoutubeandtiktok
AT javididarius accuracyofprostatecancerscreeningrecommendationsforhighriskpopulationsonyoutubeandtiktok
AT babarmustufa accuracyofprostatecancerscreeningrecommendationsforhighriskpopulationsonyoutubeandtiktok
AT loebstacy accuracyofprostatecancerscreeningrecommendationsforhighriskpopulationsonyoutubeandtiktok
AT wattskara accuracyofprostatecancerscreeningrecommendationsforhighriskpopulationsonyoutubeandtiktok