Cargando…
Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas
BACKGROUND: China has been increasing the investment in Primary Health Care Institutions (PHCIs) since the launch of the New Health Care System Reform in 2009. It is a crucial concern whether the PHCIs can meet residents' need both in urban and rural with the limited government finance, especia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073552 |
_version_ | 1784889301856681984 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Junxu Peng, Rong Chang, Yajun Liu, Zijun Gao, Songhui Zhao, Chuanjun Li, Yixin Feng, Qiming Qin, Xianjing |
author_facet | Zhou, Junxu Peng, Rong Chang, Yajun Liu, Zijun Gao, Songhui Zhao, Chuanjun Li, Yixin Feng, Qiming Qin, Xianjing |
author_sort | Zhou, Junxu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: China has been increasing the investment in Primary Health Care Institutions (PHCIs) since the launch of the New Health Care System Reform in 2009. It is a crucial concern whether the PHCIs can meet residents' need both in urban and rural with the limited government finance, especially encountering the challenge of the COVID-19. This study aimed to reveal the trend of the primary health service efficiency in the past decade, compare the urban-rural differences, and explore relevant factors. METHODS: DEA and Malmquist models were applied to calculate the health service efficiency of PHCIs among 28 provinces in China, with the input variables including the number of institutions, number of beds, number of health technicians, and the outputs variables including the number of outpatients and emergency visits, number of discharged patients. And the Tobit model was used to analyze the factors on the efficiency in urban and rural. A sensitivity analysis for model validations was also carried out. RESULTS: The average technical efficiency (TE) of urban PHCIs fluctuated from 63.3% to 67.1%, which was lower than that in rural (75.8–82.2%) from 2009 to 2019. In terms of dynamic efficiency, the urban PHCIs performed better than the rural, and the trends in the total factor productivity change were associated with favorable technology advancement. The population density and dependency ratio were the key factors on TE in both of the urban and rural PHCIs, and these two factors were positively correlated to TE. In terms of TE, it was negatively correlated with the proportion of total health expenditure as a percentage of GDP in urban PHCIs, while in rural it was positively correlated with the urbanization rate and negatively correlated with GDP per capita. Besides, the tests of Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal–Wallis H indicated the internal validity and robustness of the chosen DEA and Malmquist models. CONCLUSIONS: It needs to reduce the health resource wastes and increase service provision in urban PHCIs. Meanwhile, it is necessary to strengthen medical technology and gaining greater efficiency in rural PHCIs by technology renovation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9931751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99317512023-02-17 Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas Zhou, Junxu Peng, Rong Chang, Yajun Liu, Zijun Gao, Songhui Zhao, Chuanjun Li, Yixin Feng, Qiming Qin, Xianjing Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: China has been increasing the investment in Primary Health Care Institutions (PHCIs) since the launch of the New Health Care System Reform in 2009. It is a crucial concern whether the PHCIs can meet residents' need both in urban and rural with the limited government finance, especially encountering the challenge of the COVID-19. This study aimed to reveal the trend of the primary health service efficiency in the past decade, compare the urban-rural differences, and explore relevant factors. METHODS: DEA and Malmquist models were applied to calculate the health service efficiency of PHCIs among 28 provinces in China, with the input variables including the number of institutions, number of beds, number of health technicians, and the outputs variables including the number of outpatients and emergency visits, number of discharged patients. And the Tobit model was used to analyze the factors on the efficiency in urban and rural. A sensitivity analysis for model validations was also carried out. RESULTS: The average technical efficiency (TE) of urban PHCIs fluctuated from 63.3% to 67.1%, which was lower than that in rural (75.8–82.2%) from 2009 to 2019. In terms of dynamic efficiency, the urban PHCIs performed better than the rural, and the trends in the total factor productivity change were associated with favorable technology advancement. The population density and dependency ratio were the key factors on TE in both of the urban and rural PHCIs, and these two factors were positively correlated to TE. In terms of TE, it was negatively correlated with the proportion of total health expenditure as a percentage of GDP in urban PHCIs, while in rural it was positively correlated with the urbanization rate and negatively correlated with GDP per capita. Besides, the tests of Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal–Wallis H indicated the internal validity and robustness of the chosen DEA and Malmquist models. CONCLUSIONS: It needs to reduce the health resource wastes and increase service provision in urban PHCIs. Meanwhile, it is necessary to strengthen medical technology and gaining greater efficiency in rural PHCIs by technology renovation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9931751/ /pubmed/36817900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073552 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhou, Peng, Chang, Liu, Gao, Zhao, Li, Feng and Qin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Zhou, Junxu Peng, Rong Chang, Yajun Liu, Zijun Gao, Songhui Zhao, Chuanjun Li, Yixin Feng, Qiming Qin, Xianjing Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas |
title | Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas |
title_full | Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas |
title_fullStr | Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas |
title_full_unstemmed | Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas |
title_short | Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas |
title_sort | analyzing the efficiency of chinese primary healthcare institutions using the malmquist-dea approach: evidence from urban and rural areas |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073552 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoujunxu analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas AT pengrong analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas AT changyajun analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas AT liuzijun analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas AT gaosonghui analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas AT zhaochuanjun analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas AT liyixin analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas AT fengqiming analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas AT qinxianjing analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas |