Cargando…

Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas

BACKGROUND: China has been increasing the investment in Primary Health Care Institutions (PHCIs) since the launch of the New Health Care System Reform in 2009. It is a crucial concern whether the PHCIs can meet residents' need both in urban and rural with the limited government finance, especia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Junxu, Peng, Rong, Chang, Yajun, Liu, Zijun, Gao, Songhui, Zhao, Chuanjun, Li, Yixin, Feng, Qiming, Qin, Xianjing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817900
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073552
_version_ 1784889301856681984
author Zhou, Junxu
Peng, Rong
Chang, Yajun
Liu, Zijun
Gao, Songhui
Zhao, Chuanjun
Li, Yixin
Feng, Qiming
Qin, Xianjing
author_facet Zhou, Junxu
Peng, Rong
Chang, Yajun
Liu, Zijun
Gao, Songhui
Zhao, Chuanjun
Li, Yixin
Feng, Qiming
Qin, Xianjing
author_sort Zhou, Junxu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: China has been increasing the investment in Primary Health Care Institutions (PHCIs) since the launch of the New Health Care System Reform in 2009. It is a crucial concern whether the PHCIs can meet residents' need both in urban and rural with the limited government finance, especially encountering the challenge of the COVID-19. This study aimed to reveal the trend of the primary health service efficiency in the past decade, compare the urban-rural differences, and explore relevant factors. METHODS: DEA and Malmquist models were applied to calculate the health service efficiency of PHCIs among 28 provinces in China, with the input variables including the number of institutions, number of beds, number of health technicians, and the outputs variables including the number of outpatients and emergency visits, number of discharged patients. And the Tobit model was used to analyze the factors on the efficiency in urban and rural. A sensitivity analysis for model validations was also carried out. RESULTS: The average technical efficiency (TE) of urban PHCIs fluctuated from 63.3% to 67.1%, which was lower than that in rural (75.8–82.2%) from 2009 to 2019. In terms of dynamic efficiency, the urban PHCIs performed better than the rural, and the trends in the total factor productivity change were associated with favorable technology advancement. The population density and dependency ratio were the key factors on TE in both of the urban and rural PHCIs, and these two factors were positively correlated to TE. In terms of TE, it was negatively correlated with the proportion of total health expenditure as a percentage of GDP in urban PHCIs, while in rural it was positively correlated with the urbanization rate and negatively correlated with GDP per capita. Besides, the tests of Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal–Wallis H indicated the internal validity and robustness of the chosen DEA and Malmquist models. CONCLUSIONS: It needs to reduce the health resource wastes and increase service provision in urban PHCIs. Meanwhile, it is necessary to strengthen medical technology and gaining greater efficiency in rural PHCIs by technology renovation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9931751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99317512023-02-17 Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas Zhou, Junxu Peng, Rong Chang, Yajun Liu, Zijun Gao, Songhui Zhao, Chuanjun Li, Yixin Feng, Qiming Qin, Xianjing Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: China has been increasing the investment in Primary Health Care Institutions (PHCIs) since the launch of the New Health Care System Reform in 2009. It is a crucial concern whether the PHCIs can meet residents' need both in urban and rural with the limited government finance, especially encountering the challenge of the COVID-19. This study aimed to reveal the trend of the primary health service efficiency in the past decade, compare the urban-rural differences, and explore relevant factors. METHODS: DEA and Malmquist models were applied to calculate the health service efficiency of PHCIs among 28 provinces in China, with the input variables including the number of institutions, number of beds, number of health technicians, and the outputs variables including the number of outpatients and emergency visits, number of discharged patients. And the Tobit model was used to analyze the factors on the efficiency in urban and rural. A sensitivity analysis for model validations was also carried out. RESULTS: The average technical efficiency (TE) of urban PHCIs fluctuated from 63.3% to 67.1%, which was lower than that in rural (75.8–82.2%) from 2009 to 2019. In terms of dynamic efficiency, the urban PHCIs performed better than the rural, and the trends in the total factor productivity change were associated with favorable technology advancement. The population density and dependency ratio were the key factors on TE in both of the urban and rural PHCIs, and these two factors were positively correlated to TE. In terms of TE, it was negatively correlated with the proportion of total health expenditure as a percentage of GDP in urban PHCIs, while in rural it was positively correlated with the urbanization rate and negatively correlated with GDP per capita. Besides, the tests of Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal–Wallis H indicated the internal validity and robustness of the chosen DEA and Malmquist models. CONCLUSIONS: It needs to reduce the health resource wastes and increase service provision in urban PHCIs. Meanwhile, it is necessary to strengthen medical technology and gaining greater efficiency in rural PHCIs by technology renovation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9931751/ /pubmed/36817900 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073552 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhou, Peng, Chang, Liu, Gao, Zhao, Li, Feng and Qin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Zhou, Junxu
Peng, Rong
Chang, Yajun
Liu, Zijun
Gao, Songhui
Zhao, Chuanjun
Li, Yixin
Feng, Qiming
Qin, Xianjing
Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas
title Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas
title_full Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas
title_fullStr Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas
title_short Analyzing the efficiency of Chinese primary healthcare institutions using the Malmquist-DEA approach: Evidence from urban and rural areas
title_sort analyzing the efficiency of chinese primary healthcare institutions using the malmquist-dea approach: evidence from urban and rural areas
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817900
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073552
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoujunxu analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas
AT pengrong analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas
AT changyajun analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas
AT liuzijun analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas
AT gaosonghui analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas
AT zhaochuanjun analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas
AT liyixin analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas
AT fengqiming analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas
AT qinxianjing analyzingtheefficiencyofchineseprimaryhealthcareinstitutionsusingthemalmquistdeaapproachevidencefromurbanandruralareas