Cargando…

Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a standard of care for many localizations but the question of the optimal fractionation remains a matter of concern. If single fraction sessions are routinely used for intracranial targets, their utilization for mobile extracranial lesions is a source of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terlizzi, M., Limkin, E., Sellami, N., Louvel, G., Blanchard, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100584
_version_ 1784889332376535040
author Terlizzi, M.
Limkin, E.
Sellami, N.
Louvel, G.
Blanchard, P.
author_facet Terlizzi, M.
Limkin, E.
Sellami, N.
Louvel, G.
Blanchard, P.
author_sort Terlizzi, M.
collection PubMed
description Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a standard of care for many localizations but the question of the optimal fractionation remains a matter of concern. If single fraction sessions are routinely used for intracranial targets, their utilization for mobile extracranial lesions is a source of debate and apprehension. Single session treatments improve patient comfort, provide a medico-economic benefit, and have proven useful in the context of the SARS-CoV 2 pandemic. However, both technical and radiobiological uncertainties remain. Experience from intracranial radiosurgery has shown that the size of the target, its proximity to organs at risk, tumor histology, and the volume of normal tissue irradiated are all determining factors in the choice of fractionation. The literature on the use of single fraction for extracranial sites is still scarce. Only primary and secondary pulmonary tumors have been evaluated in prospective randomized trials, allowing the integration of these fractionation schemes in daily practice, for highly selected cases and in trained teams. The level of evidence for the other organs is mainly based on dose escalation or retrospective trials and calls for caution, with further studies being needed before routine use in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9931895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99318952023-02-17 Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature Terlizzi, M. Limkin, E. Sellami, N. Louvel, G. Blanchard, P. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Review Article Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a standard of care for many localizations but the question of the optimal fractionation remains a matter of concern. If single fraction sessions are routinely used for intracranial targets, their utilization for mobile extracranial lesions is a source of debate and apprehension. Single session treatments improve patient comfort, provide a medico-economic benefit, and have proven useful in the context of the SARS-CoV 2 pandemic. However, both technical and radiobiological uncertainties remain. Experience from intracranial radiosurgery has shown that the size of the target, its proximity to organs at risk, tumor histology, and the volume of normal tissue irradiated are all determining factors in the choice of fractionation. The literature on the use of single fraction for extracranial sites is still scarce. Only primary and secondary pulmonary tumors have been evaluated in prospective randomized trials, allowing the integration of these fractionation schemes in daily practice, for highly selected cases and in trained teams. The level of evidence for the other organs is mainly based on dose escalation or retrospective trials and calls for caution, with further studies being needed before routine use in clinical practice. Elsevier 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9931895/ /pubmed/36816840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100584 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Terlizzi, M.
Limkin, E.
Sellami, N.
Louvel, G.
Blanchard, P.
Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature
title Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature
title_full Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature
title_fullStr Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature
title_full_unstemmed Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature
title_short Is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)? A critical appraisal of the current literature
title_sort is single fraction the future of stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt)? a critical appraisal of the current literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100584
work_keys_str_mv AT terlizzim issinglefractionthefutureofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrtacriticalappraisalofthecurrentliterature
AT limkine issinglefractionthefutureofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrtacriticalappraisalofthecurrentliterature
AT sellamin issinglefractionthefutureofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrtacriticalappraisalofthecurrentliterature
AT louvelg issinglefractionthefutureofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrtacriticalappraisalofthecurrentliterature
AT blanchardp issinglefractionthefutureofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapysbrtacriticalappraisalofthecurrentliterature