Cargando…

Prognostic evaluation of polygenic risk score underlying pan-cancer analysis: evidence from two large-scale cohorts

BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk score (PRS) has been demonstrated to be effective in identifying individuals at high risk of developing cancer, but its prognostic value remains unclear. METHODS: We constructed site-specific PRSs by aggregating the risk effect of independent variants derived from previous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xin, Junyi, Jiang, Xia, Li, Huiqin, Chen, Silu, Zhang, Zhengdong, Wang, Meilin, Gu, Dongying, Du, Mulong, Christiani, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36739632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104454
_version_ 1784889339253096448
author Xin, Junyi
Jiang, Xia
Li, Huiqin
Chen, Silu
Zhang, Zhengdong
Wang, Meilin
Gu, Dongying
Du, Mulong
Christiani, David C.
author_facet Xin, Junyi
Jiang, Xia
Li, Huiqin
Chen, Silu
Zhang, Zhengdong
Wang, Meilin
Gu, Dongying
Du, Mulong
Christiani, David C.
author_sort Xin, Junyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk score (PRS) has been demonstrated to be effective in identifying individuals at high risk of developing cancer, but its prognostic value remains unclear. METHODS: We constructed site-specific PRSs by aggregating the risk effect of independent variants derived from previous genome-wide association studies (GWASs) across 17 cancer types. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association of each PRS with cancer survival, leveraging data from two prospective European cohorts, namely the UK Biobank involving 19,628 incident cases and The Cancer Genome Atlas involving 7079 prevalent cases. The combined PRS (CPRS), determined by merging site-specific PRSs, was further used to assess the prognostic effect of PRS on overall cancer in a sex-specific manner. FINDINGS: We discovered that the cancer risk-related PRS was associated with neither overall survival (OS) nor cancer-specific survival (CSS) of each site-specific cancer with an underlying false discovery rate (FDR) P > 0.05, as evidenced by consistent findings from the two cohorts. Furthermore, the fixed-effect meta-analysis of the two cohorts provided no evidence to support for an association between CPRS and overall cancer survival in both males [OS: hazard ratio (HR)(meta) = 1.00, P(meta) = 0.760; CSS: HR(meta) = 1.01, P(meta) = 0.447] and females (OS: HR(meta) = 0.97, P(meta) = 0.067; CSS: HR(meta) = 0.96, P(meta) = 0.054). Similar results were observed across multiple sensitivity analyses. INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate that the risk-specific PRS might not be a clinically useful tool in cancer prognosis prediction and further studies focusing on the development of polygenic prognostic score are warranted. FUNDING: This project was funded by the 10.13039/501100001809National Natural Science Foundation of China (82173601 and 82073631), and 10.13039/501100012246Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Public Health and Preventive Medicine).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9931923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99319232023-02-17 Prognostic evaluation of polygenic risk score underlying pan-cancer analysis: evidence from two large-scale cohorts Xin, Junyi Jiang, Xia Li, Huiqin Chen, Silu Zhang, Zhengdong Wang, Meilin Gu, Dongying Du, Mulong Christiani, David C. eBioMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk score (PRS) has been demonstrated to be effective in identifying individuals at high risk of developing cancer, but its prognostic value remains unclear. METHODS: We constructed site-specific PRSs by aggregating the risk effect of independent variants derived from previous genome-wide association studies (GWASs) across 17 cancer types. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association of each PRS with cancer survival, leveraging data from two prospective European cohorts, namely the UK Biobank involving 19,628 incident cases and The Cancer Genome Atlas involving 7079 prevalent cases. The combined PRS (CPRS), determined by merging site-specific PRSs, was further used to assess the prognostic effect of PRS on overall cancer in a sex-specific manner. FINDINGS: We discovered that the cancer risk-related PRS was associated with neither overall survival (OS) nor cancer-specific survival (CSS) of each site-specific cancer with an underlying false discovery rate (FDR) P > 0.05, as evidenced by consistent findings from the two cohorts. Furthermore, the fixed-effect meta-analysis of the two cohorts provided no evidence to support for an association between CPRS and overall cancer survival in both males [OS: hazard ratio (HR)(meta) = 1.00, P(meta) = 0.760; CSS: HR(meta) = 1.01, P(meta) = 0.447] and females (OS: HR(meta) = 0.97, P(meta) = 0.067; CSS: HR(meta) = 0.96, P(meta) = 0.054). Similar results were observed across multiple sensitivity analyses. INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate that the risk-specific PRS might not be a clinically useful tool in cancer prognosis prediction and further studies focusing on the development of polygenic prognostic score are warranted. FUNDING: This project was funded by the 10.13039/501100001809National Natural Science Foundation of China (82173601 and 82073631), and 10.13039/501100012246Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Public Health and Preventive Medicine). Elsevier 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9931923/ /pubmed/36739632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104454 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Xin, Junyi
Jiang, Xia
Li, Huiqin
Chen, Silu
Zhang, Zhengdong
Wang, Meilin
Gu, Dongying
Du, Mulong
Christiani, David C.
Prognostic evaluation of polygenic risk score underlying pan-cancer analysis: evidence from two large-scale cohorts
title Prognostic evaluation of polygenic risk score underlying pan-cancer analysis: evidence from two large-scale cohorts
title_full Prognostic evaluation of polygenic risk score underlying pan-cancer analysis: evidence from two large-scale cohorts
title_fullStr Prognostic evaluation of polygenic risk score underlying pan-cancer analysis: evidence from two large-scale cohorts
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic evaluation of polygenic risk score underlying pan-cancer analysis: evidence from two large-scale cohorts
title_short Prognostic evaluation of polygenic risk score underlying pan-cancer analysis: evidence from two large-scale cohorts
title_sort prognostic evaluation of polygenic risk score underlying pan-cancer analysis: evidence from two large-scale cohorts
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36739632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104454
work_keys_str_mv AT xinjunyi prognosticevaluationofpolygenicriskscoreunderlyingpancanceranalysisevidencefromtwolargescalecohorts
AT jiangxia prognosticevaluationofpolygenicriskscoreunderlyingpancanceranalysisevidencefromtwolargescalecohorts
AT lihuiqin prognosticevaluationofpolygenicriskscoreunderlyingpancanceranalysisevidencefromtwolargescalecohorts
AT chensilu prognosticevaluationofpolygenicriskscoreunderlyingpancanceranalysisevidencefromtwolargescalecohorts
AT zhangzhengdong prognosticevaluationofpolygenicriskscoreunderlyingpancanceranalysisevidencefromtwolargescalecohorts
AT wangmeilin prognosticevaluationofpolygenicriskscoreunderlyingpancanceranalysisevidencefromtwolargescalecohorts
AT gudongying prognosticevaluationofpolygenicriskscoreunderlyingpancanceranalysisevidencefromtwolargescalecohorts
AT dumulong prognosticevaluationofpolygenicriskscoreunderlyingpancanceranalysisevidencefromtwolargescalecohorts
AT christianidavidc prognosticevaluationofpolygenicriskscoreunderlyingpancanceranalysisevidencefromtwolargescalecohorts