Cargando…

Classification of maxillectomy in edentulous arch defects, algorithm, concept, and proposal classifications: A review

OBJECTIVES: Aramany's classification of postsurgical maxillectomy defects was introduced for partially edentulous situations, and has been widely used for education and effective communication among practitioners. Numerous classifications of maxillofacial defects, based on surgical procedure, r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alqarni, Hatem, Alfaifi, Mohammed, Ahmed, Walaa Magdy, Almutairi, Rania, Kattadiyil, Mathew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.708
_version_ 1784889407108546560
author Alqarni, Hatem
Alfaifi, Mohammed
Ahmed, Walaa Magdy
Almutairi, Rania
Kattadiyil, Mathew T.
author_facet Alqarni, Hatem
Alfaifi, Mohammed
Ahmed, Walaa Magdy
Almutairi, Rania
Kattadiyil, Mathew T.
author_sort Alqarni, Hatem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Aramany's classification of postsurgical maxillectomy defects was introduced for partially edentulous situations, and has been widely used for education and effective communication among practitioners. Numerous classifications of maxillofacial defects, based on surgical procedure, resultant defects, or prosthodontist's perspective after rehabilitation, exist in the literature. However, no single classification has incorporated all these factors. The purpose of this review was to highlight the classification systems and describe a pragmatic classification series for edentulous maxillary arch defects (maxillectomy) by applying the Aramany classification criteria, to enhance treatment outcomes and communication among practitioners. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search of the literature published in English was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar database. Keywords used were “maxillectomy classification” AND “surgical resection,” “maxillectomy classification” AND “complete edentulous.” In addition, a manual search was also performed followed the same criteria in the following journals: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry and Journal of Prosthodontics. RESULTS: Several classification systems for partial dentition were found in terms of size, location, dentition, and extension of the defect (isolated or communication defects). The findings revealed a variety of maxillectomy defect classifications for partially dentate, considering surgical factors and rehabilitation. However, no study or classification system exist for the edentulous arch defects. CONCLUSIONS: Different classification systems for maxillectomy defects exist in the literature, only for partially dentate patients. To the authors best knowledge, no classification system for completely edentulous maxillary arch defects have been proposed till date. A simple classification system with clear characteristics for edentulous maxillectomy dental arch defects has been proposed. This classification was modeled after Aramany classification for easier memorization and application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9932229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99322292023-02-17 Classification of maxillectomy in edentulous arch defects, algorithm, concept, and proposal classifications: A review Alqarni, Hatem Alfaifi, Mohammed Ahmed, Walaa Magdy Almutairi, Rania Kattadiyil, Mathew T. Clin Exp Dent Res Review Articles OBJECTIVES: Aramany's classification of postsurgical maxillectomy defects was introduced for partially edentulous situations, and has been widely used for education and effective communication among practitioners. Numerous classifications of maxillofacial defects, based on surgical procedure, resultant defects, or prosthodontist's perspective after rehabilitation, exist in the literature. However, no single classification has incorporated all these factors. The purpose of this review was to highlight the classification systems and describe a pragmatic classification series for edentulous maxillary arch defects (maxillectomy) by applying the Aramany classification criteria, to enhance treatment outcomes and communication among practitioners. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search of the literature published in English was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar database. Keywords used were “maxillectomy classification” AND “surgical resection,” “maxillectomy classification” AND “complete edentulous.” In addition, a manual search was also performed followed the same criteria in the following journals: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry and Journal of Prosthodontics. RESULTS: Several classification systems for partial dentition were found in terms of size, location, dentition, and extension of the defect (isolated or communication defects). The findings revealed a variety of maxillectomy defect classifications for partially dentate, considering surgical factors and rehabilitation. However, no study or classification system exist for the edentulous arch defects. CONCLUSIONS: Different classification systems for maxillectomy defects exist in the literature, only for partially dentate patients. To the authors best knowledge, no classification system for completely edentulous maxillary arch defects have been proposed till date. A simple classification system with clear characteristics for edentulous maxillectomy dental arch defects has been proposed. This classification was modeled after Aramany classification for easier memorization and application. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9932229/ /pubmed/36600487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.708 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Alqarni, Hatem
Alfaifi, Mohammed
Ahmed, Walaa Magdy
Almutairi, Rania
Kattadiyil, Mathew T.
Classification of maxillectomy in edentulous arch defects, algorithm, concept, and proposal classifications: A review
title Classification of maxillectomy in edentulous arch defects, algorithm, concept, and proposal classifications: A review
title_full Classification of maxillectomy in edentulous arch defects, algorithm, concept, and proposal classifications: A review
title_fullStr Classification of maxillectomy in edentulous arch defects, algorithm, concept, and proposal classifications: A review
title_full_unstemmed Classification of maxillectomy in edentulous arch defects, algorithm, concept, and proposal classifications: A review
title_short Classification of maxillectomy in edentulous arch defects, algorithm, concept, and proposal classifications: A review
title_sort classification of maxillectomy in edentulous arch defects, algorithm, concept, and proposal classifications: a review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.708
work_keys_str_mv AT alqarnihatem classificationofmaxillectomyinedentulousarchdefectsalgorithmconceptandproposalclassificationsareview
AT alfaifimohammed classificationofmaxillectomyinedentulousarchdefectsalgorithmconceptandproposalclassificationsareview
AT ahmedwalaamagdy classificationofmaxillectomyinedentulousarchdefectsalgorithmconceptandproposalclassificationsareview
AT almutairirania classificationofmaxillectomyinedentulousarchdefectsalgorithmconceptandproposalclassificationsareview
AT kattadiyilmathewt classificationofmaxillectomyinedentulousarchdefectsalgorithmconceptandproposalclassificationsareview