Cargando…
Comparison between ozone and CHX gel application for reduction of pain and incidence of dry socket after lower third molar removal
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy between ozone gas and 1% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel in the incidence of dry socket after surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Overall, 30 patients of both genders were included in the study, with indicati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.675 |
_version_ | 1784889409095598080 |
---|---|
author | Ahmedi, Jehona Agani, Zana Ademi Abdyli, Resmije Prekazi Loxha, Mergime Hamiti‐Krasniqi, Vjosa Rexhepi, Aida Stubljar, David |
author_facet | Ahmedi, Jehona Agani, Zana Ademi Abdyli, Resmije Prekazi Loxha, Mergime Hamiti‐Krasniqi, Vjosa Rexhepi, Aida Stubljar, David |
author_sort | Ahmedi, Jehona |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy between ozone gas and 1% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel in the incidence of dry socket after surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Overall, 30 patients of both genders were included in the study, with indication of surgical extraction of lower third molar, positioned similarly after being clinically and radiographically checked by X‐ray and orthopantomography. Each patient was subjected to both groups in separate sessions: treated with ozone gas and with CHX gel 1%. Data on pain intensity, number of taken analgesics‐painkillers, and dry socket were recorded for 48 h and at Day 7. RESULTS: Ozone gas and CHX gel effectively reduced pain intensity and prevented dry socket. The number of taken analgesics 48 h and 7 days after surgery showed no statistical significance. The same was observed for the distribution of pain. Only one patient reported the occurrence of dry socket 7 days after the surgical extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Ozone gas and CHX 1% gel are both efficient in decreasing postoperative symptoms and incidence rates of dry socket, but in comparison to each other, the use of ozone gas is showing a bit better prevention capability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9932237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99322372023-02-17 Comparison between ozone and CHX gel application for reduction of pain and incidence of dry socket after lower third molar removal Ahmedi, Jehona Agani, Zana Ademi Abdyli, Resmije Prekazi Loxha, Mergime Hamiti‐Krasniqi, Vjosa Rexhepi, Aida Stubljar, David Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy between ozone gas and 1% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel in the incidence of dry socket after surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Overall, 30 patients of both genders were included in the study, with indication of surgical extraction of lower third molar, positioned similarly after being clinically and radiographically checked by X‐ray and orthopantomography. Each patient was subjected to both groups in separate sessions: treated with ozone gas and with CHX gel 1%. Data on pain intensity, number of taken analgesics‐painkillers, and dry socket were recorded for 48 h and at Day 7. RESULTS: Ozone gas and CHX gel effectively reduced pain intensity and prevented dry socket. The number of taken analgesics 48 h and 7 days after surgery showed no statistical significance. The same was observed for the distribution of pain. Only one patient reported the occurrence of dry socket 7 days after the surgical extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Ozone gas and CHX 1% gel are both efficient in decreasing postoperative symptoms and incidence rates of dry socket, but in comparison to each other, the use of ozone gas is showing a bit better prevention capability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9932237/ /pubmed/36245293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.675 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ahmedi, Jehona Agani, Zana Ademi Abdyli, Resmije Prekazi Loxha, Mergime Hamiti‐Krasniqi, Vjosa Rexhepi, Aida Stubljar, David Comparison between ozone and CHX gel application for reduction of pain and incidence of dry socket after lower third molar removal |
title | Comparison between ozone and CHX gel application for reduction of pain and incidence of dry socket after lower third molar removal |
title_full | Comparison between ozone and CHX gel application for reduction of pain and incidence of dry socket after lower third molar removal |
title_fullStr | Comparison between ozone and CHX gel application for reduction of pain and incidence of dry socket after lower third molar removal |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between ozone and CHX gel application for reduction of pain and incidence of dry socket after lower third molar removal |
title_short | Comparison between ozone and CHX gel application for reduction of pain and incidence of dry socket after lower third molar removal |
title_sort | comparison between ozone and chx gel application for reduction of pain and incidence of dry socket after lower third molar removal |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmedijehona comparisonbetweenozoneandchxgelapplicationforreductionofpainandincidenceofdrysocketafterlowerthirdmolarremoval AT aganizana comparisonbetweenozoneandchxgelapplicationforreductionofpainandincidenceofdrysocketafterlowerthirdmolarremoval AT ademiabdyliresmije comparisonbetweenozoneandchxgelapplicationforreductionofpainandincidenceofdrysocketafterlowerthirdmolarremoval AT prekaziloxhamergime comparisonbetweenozoneandchxgelapplicationforreductionofpainandincidenceofdrysocketafterlowerthirdmolarremoval AT hamitikrasniqivjosa comparisonbetweenozoneandchxgelapplicationforreductionofpainandincidenceofdrysocketafterlowerthirdmolarremoval AT rexhepiaida comparisonbetweenozoneandchxgelapplicationforreductionofpainandincidenceofdrysocketafterlowerthirdmolarremoval AT stubljardavid comparisonbetweenozoneandchxgelapplicationforreductionofpainandincidenceofdrysocketafterlowerthirdmolarremoval |