Cargando…

Neonatal pain assessment: Do we have the right tools?

BACKGROUND: The assessment and management of neonatal pain is crucial for the development and wellbeing of vulnerable infants. Specifically, neonatal pain is associated with adverse health outcomes but is often under-identified and therefore under-treated. Neonatal stress may be misinterpreted as pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Llerena, Amelia, Tran, Krystal, Choudhary, Danyal, Hausmann, Jacqueline, Goldgof, Dmitry, Sun, Yu, Prescott, Stephanie M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819198
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1022751
_version_ 1784889417033318400
author Llerena, Amelia
Tran, Krystal
Choudhary, Danyal
Hausmann, Jacqueline
Goldgof, Dmitry
Sun, Yu
Prescott, Stephanie M.
author_facet Llerena, Amelia
Tran, Krystal
Choudhary, Danyal
Hausmann, Jacqueline
Goldgof, Dmitry
Sun, Yu
Prescott, Stephanie M.
author_sort Llerena, Amelia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The assessment and management of neonatal pain is crucial for the development and wellbeing of vulnerable infants. Specifically, neonatal pain is associated with adverse health outcomes but is often under-identified and therefore under-treated. Neonatal stress may be misinterpreted as pain and may therefore be treated inappropriately. The assessment of neonatal pain is complicated by the non-verbal status of patients, age-dependent variation in pain responses, limited education on identifying pain in premature infants, and the clinical utility of existing tools. OBJECTIVE: We review research surrounding neonatal pain assessment scales currently in use to assess neonatal pain in the neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of original research using PRISMA guidelines for literature published between 2016 and 2021 using the key words “neonatal pain assessment” in the databases Web of Science, PubMed, and CINAHL. Fifteen articles remained after review, duplicate, irrelevant, or low-quality articles were eliminated. RESULTS: We found research evaluating 13 neonatal pain scales. Important measurement categories include behavioral parameters, physiological parameters, continuous pain, acute pain, chronic pain, and the ability to distinguish between pain and stress. Provider education, inter-rater reliability and ease of use are important factors that contribute to an assessment tool's success. Each scale studied had strengths and limitations that aided or hindered its use for measuring neonatal pain in the neonatal intensive care unit, but no scale excelled in all areas identified as important for reliably identifying and measuring pain in this vulnerable population. CONCLUSION: A more comprehensive neonatal pain assessment tool and more provider education on differences in pain signals in premature neonates may be needed to increase the clinical utility of pain scales that address the different aspects of neonatal pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9932268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99322682023-02-17 Neonatal pain assessment: Do we have the right tools? Llerena, Amelia Tran, Krystal Choudhary, Danyal Hausmann, Jacqueline Goldgof, Dmitry Sun, Yu Prescott, Stephanie M. Front Pediatr Pediatrics BACKGROUND: The assessment and management of neonatal pain is crucial for the development and wellbeing of vulnerable infants. Specifically, neonatal pain is associated with adverse health outcomes but is often under-identified and therefore under-treated. Neonatal stress may be misinterpreted as pain and may therefore be treated inappropriately. The assessment of neonatal pain is complicated by the non-verbal status of patients, age-dependent variation in pain responses, limited education on identifying pain in premature infants, and the clinical utility of existing tools. OBJECTIVE: We review research surrounding neonatal pain assessment scales currently in use to assess neonatal pain in the neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of original research using PRISMA guidelines for literature published between 2016 and 2021 using the key words “neonatal pain assessment” in the databases Web of Science, PubMed, and CINAHL. Fifteen articles remained after review, duplicate, irrelevant, or low-quality articles were eliminated. RESULTS: We found research evaluating 13 neonatal pain scales. Important measurement categories include behavioral parameters, physiological parameters, continuous pain, acute pain, chronic pain, and the ability to distinguish between pain and stress. Provider education, inter-rater reliability and ease of use are important factors that contribute to an assessment tool's success. Each scale studied had strengths and limitations that aided or hindered its use for measuring neonatal pain in the neonatal intensive care unit, but no scale excelled in all areas identified as important for reliably identifying and measuring pain in this vulnerable population. CONCLUSION: A more comprehensive neonatal pain assessment tool and more provider education on differences in pain signals in premature neonates may be needed to increase the clinical utility of pain scales that address the different aspects of neonatal pain. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9932268/ /pubmed/36819198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1022751 Text en © 2023 Llerena, Tran, Choudhary, Hausmann, Goldgof, Sun and Prescott. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Llerena, Amelia
Tran, Krystal
Choudhary, Danyal
Hausmann, Jacqueline
Goldgof, Dmitry
Sun, Yu
Prescott, Stephanie M.
Neonatal pain assessment: Do we have the right tools?
title Neonatal pain assessment: Do we have the right tools?
title_full Neonatal pain assessment: Do we have the right tools?
title_fullStr Neonatal pain assessment: Do we have the right tools?
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal pain assessment: Do we have the right tools?
title_short Neonatal pain assessment: Do we have the right tools?
title_sort neonatal pain assessment: do we have the right tools?
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819198
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1022751
work_keys_str_mv AT llerenaamelia neonatalpainassessmentdowehavetherighttools
AT trankrystal neonatalpainassessmentdowehavetherighttools
AT choudharydanyal neonatalpainassessmentdowehavetherighttools
AT hausmannjacqueline neonatalpainassessmentdowehavetherighttools
AT goldgofdmitry neonatalpainassessmentdowehavetherighttools
AT sunyu neonatalpainassessmentdowehavetherighttools
AT prescottstephaniem neonatalpainassessmentdowehavetherighttools