Cargando…

Spatial localization during open-loop smooth pursuit

INTRODUCTION: Numerous previous studies have shown that eye movements induce errors in the localization of briefly flashed stimuli. Remarkably, the error pattern is indicative of the underlying eye movement and the exact experimental condition. For smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) and the slow ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dowiasch, Stefan, Blanke, Marius, Knöll, Jonas, Bremmer, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1058340
_version_ 1784889468719726592
author Dowiasch, Stefan
Blanke, Marius
Knöll, Jonas
Bremmer, Frank
author_facet Dowiasch, Stefan
Blanke, Marius
Knöll, Jonas
Bremmer, Frank
author_sort Dowiasch, Stefan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Numerous previous studies have shown that eye movements induce errors in the localization of briefly flashed stimuli. Remarkably, the error pattern is indicative of the underlying eye movement and the exact experimental condition. For smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) and the slow phase of the optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), perceived stimulus locations are shifted in the direction of the ongoing eye movement, with a hemifield asymmetry observed only during SPEM. During the slow phases of the optokinetic afternystagmus (OKAN), however, the error pattern can be described as a perceptual expansion of space. Different from SPEM and OKN, the OKAN is an open-loop eye movement. METHODS: Visually guided smooth pursuit can be transformed into an open–loop eye movement by briefly blanking the pursuit target (gap). Here, we examined flash localization during open-loop pursuit and asked, whether localization is also prone to errors and whether these are similar to those found during SPEM or during OKAN. Human subjects tracked a pursuit target. In half of the trials, the target was extinguished for 300 ms (gap) during the steady–state, inducing open–loop pursuit. Flashes were presented during this gap or during steady–state (closed–loop) pursuit. RESULTS: In both conditions, perceived flash locations were shifted in the direction of the eye movement. The overall error pattern was very similar with error size being slightly smaller in the gap condition. The differences between errors in the open- and closed-loop conditions were largest in the central visual field and smallest in the periphery. DISCUSSION: We discuss the findings in light of the neural substrates driving the different forms of eye movements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9932511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99325112023-02-17 Spatial localization during open-loop smooth pursuit Dowiasch, Stefan Blanke, Marius Knöll, Jonas Bremmer, Frank Front Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Numerous previous studies have shown that eye movements induce errors in the localization of briefly flashed stimuli. Remarkably, the error pattern is indicative of the underlying eye movement and the exact experimental condition. For smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) and the slow phase of the optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), perceived stimulus locations are shifted in the direction of the ongoing eye movement, with a hemifield asymmetry observed only during SPEM. During the slow phases of the optokinetic afternystagmus (OKAN), however, the error pattern can be described as a perceptual expansion of space. Different from SPEM and OKN, the OKAN is an open-loop eye movement. METHODS: Visually guided smooth pursuit can be transformed into an open–loop eye movement by briefly blanking the pursuit target (gap). Here, we examined flash localization during open-loop pursuit and asked, whether localization is also prone to errors and whether these are similar to those found during SPEM or during OKAN. Human subjects tracked a pursuit target. In half of the trials, the target was extinguished for 300 ms (gap) during the steady–state, inducing open–loop pursuit. Flashes were presented during this gap or during steady–state (closed–loop) pursuit. RESULTS: In both conditions, perceived flash locations were shifted in the direction of the eye movement. The overall error pattern was very similar with error size being slightly smaller in the gap condition. The differences between errors in the open- and closed-loop conditions were largest in the central visual field and smallest in the periphery. DISCUSSION: We discuss the findings in light of the neural substrates driving the different forms of eye movements. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9932511/ /pubmed/36816133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1058340 Text en Copyright © 2023 Dowiasch, Blanke, Knöll and Bremmer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Dowiasch, Stefan
Blanke, Marius
Knöll, Jonas
Bremmer, Frank
Spatial localization during open-loop smooth pursuit
title Spatial localization during open-loop smooth pursuit
title_full Spatial localization during open-loop smooth pursuit
title_fullStr Spatial localization during open-loop smooth pursuit
title_full_unstemmed Spatial localization during open-loop smooth pursuit
title_short Spatial localization during open-loop smooth pursuit
title_sort spatial localization during open-loop smooth pursuit
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1058340
work_keys_str_mv AT dowiaschstefan spatiallocalizationduringopenloopsmoothpursuit
AT blankemarius spatiallocalizationduringopenloopsmoothpursuit
AT knolljonas spatiallocalizationduringopenloopsmoothpursuit
AT bremmerfrank spatiallocalizationduringopenloopsmoothpursuit