Cargando…

Eribulin in Patients with Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare and heterogenous malignancies with a poor prognosis in advanced disease stages. Eribulin is used in metastatic liposarcoma (LPS) patients, who have failed first-line chemotherapy and has been approved for use in patients with LPS in the USA and Europe due...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinbrecher, Oskar, Brodowicz, Thomas, Raderer, Markus, Scharrer, Anke, Fabsits, Johannes, Lamm, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000527632
_version_ 1784889542111657984
author Steinbrecher, Oskar
Brodowicz, Thomas
Raderer, Markus
Scharrer, Anke
Fabsits, Johannes
Lamm, Wolfgang
author_facet Steinbrecher, Oskar
Brodowicz, Thomas
Raderer, Markus
Scharrer, Anke
Fabsits, Johannes
Lamm, Wolfgang
author_sort Steinbrecher, Oskar
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare and heterogenous malignancies with a poor prognosis in advanced disease stages. Eribulin is used in metastatic liposarcoma (LPS) patients, who have failed first-line chemotherapy and has been approved for use in patients with LPS in the USA and Europe due to its efficacy in this histological subtype in a phase 3 trial. We have evaluated efficacy and tolerability of eribulin in LPS and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) patients in the routine clinical setting at our department. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center analysis, efficacy and safety of eribulin were retrospectively evaluated in advanced LPS and LMS patients at the Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna. RESULTS: A total of 32 adult patients treated with eribulin were identified and included in this analysis. Overall response rate was 9.4% for all patients, with one patient with LPS and two patients with LMS showing a partial response. Disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) for all patients was 50% (LPS: 47.1%; LMS 53.3%). No statistically significant difference in median progression-free survival and overall survival was detected between patients with LPS and LMS (p = 0.807 and p = 0.519, respectively). Patients with LMS (n = 2) had received fewer previous therapy lines than patients with LPS (n = 14) (≤ previous treatment lines, p < 0.001). Toxicity was generally manageable, and grade 3 + 4 events were rare. CONCLUSION: The activity and tolerability of eribulin in LPS as in well in LMS patients in the routine clinical setting is comparable to outcomes reported in published phase 3 trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9932822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99328222023-02-17 Eribulin in Patients with Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience Steinbrecher, Oskar Brodowicz, Thomas Raderer, Markus Scharrer, Anke Fabsits, Johannes Lamm, Wolfgang Oncology Clinical Study INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare and heterogenous malignancies with a poor prognosis in advanced disease stages. Eribulin is used in metastatic liposarcoma (LPS) patients, who have failed first-line chemotherapy and has been approved for use in patients with LPS in the USA and Europe due to its efficacy in this histological subtype in a phase 3 trial. We have evaluated efficacy and tolerability of eribulin in LPS and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) patients in the routine clinical setting at our department. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center analysis, efficacy and safety of eribulin were retrospectively evaluated in advanced LPS and LMS patients at the Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna. RESULTS: A total of 32 adult patients treated with eribulin were identified and included in this analysis. Overall response rate was 9.4% for all patients, with one patient with LPS and two patients with LMS showing a partial response. Disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) for all patients was 50% (LPS: 47.1%; LMS 53.3%). No statistically significant difference in median progression-free survival and overall survival was detected between patients with LPS and LMS (p = 0.807 and p = 0.519, respectively). Patients with LMS (n = 2) had received fewer previous therapy lines than patients with LPS (n = 14) (≤ previous treatment lines, p < 0.001). Toxicity was generally manageable, and grade 3 + 4 events were rare. CONCLUSION: The activity and tolerability of eribulin in LPS as in well in LMS patients in the routine clinical setting is comparable to outcomes reported in published phase 3 trials. S. Karger AG 2023-02 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9932822/ /pubmed/36273457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000527632 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Steinbrecher, Oskar
Brodowicz, Thomas
Raderer, Markus
Scharrer, Anke
Fabsits, Johannes
Lamm, Wolfgang
Eribulin in Patients with Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience
title Eribulin in Patients with Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience
title_full Eribulin in Patients with Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Eribulin in Patients with Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Eribulin in Patients with Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience
title_short Eribulin in Patients with Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience
title_sort eribulin in patients with liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective single-center experience
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36273457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000527632
work_keys_str_mv AT steinbrecheroskar eribulininpatientswithliposarcomaandleiomyosarcomaaretrospectivesinglecenterexperience
AT brodowiczthomas eribulininpatientswithliposarcomaandleiomyosarcomaaretrospectivesinglecenterexperience
AT raderermarkus eribulininpatientswithliposarcomaandleiomyosarcomaaretrospectivesinglecenterexperience
AT scharreranke eribulininpatientswithliposarcomaandleiomyosarcomaaretrospectivesinglecenterexperience
AT fabsitsjohannes eribulininpatientswithliposarcomaandleiomyosarcomaaretrospectivesinglecenterexperience
AT lammwolfgang eribulininpatientswithliposarcomaandleiomyosarcomaaretrospectivesinglecenterexperience