Cargando…

Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION: One current trend in the field of shoulder arthroplasty is a design shift to shorter and metaphyseal fixed humeral stem components. The aim of this investigation is to analyze complications resulting in revision surgery after anatomic (ASA) and reverse (RSA) short stem arthroplasty. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loew, Markus, Schnetzke, Marc, Kappes, Sophia, Bruckner, Thomas, Nolte, Anna-Katharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36795151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04802-4
_version_ 1784889589764194304
author Loew, Markus
Schnetzke, Marc
Kappes, Sophia
Bruckner, Thomas
Nolte, Anna-Katharina
author_facet Loew, Markus
Schnetzke, Marc
Kappes, Sophia
Bruckner, Thomas
Nolte, Anna-Katharina
author_sort Loew, Markus
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: One current trend in the field of shoulder arthroplasty is a design shift to shorter and metaphyseal fixed humeral stem components. The aim of this investigation is to analyze complications resulting in revision surgery after anatomic (ASA) and reverse (RSA) short stem arthroplasty. We hypothesize that complications are influenced by the type of prosthesis and indication for arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 279 short stem shoulder prostheses were implanted by the same surgeon (162 ASA; 117 RSA), and 223 of these prostheses were implanted as primary procedures; in 54 cases, arthroplasty was performed secondary to prior open surgery. Main indications were osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 134), cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) (n = 74) and posttraumatic deformities (PTr) (n = 59). Patients were evaluated at 6 weeks (follow-up 1; FU1), 2 years (FU2) and the time span of the last follow-up defined as FU3 with a minimum FU of 2 years. Complications were categorized into early complications (within FU1), intermediate complications (within FU2) and late complications (> 2 years; FU3). RESULTS: In total, 268 prostheses (96.1%) were available for FU1; 267 prostheses (95.7%) were available for FU2 and 218 prostheses (77.8%) were available for FU3. The average time for FU3 was 53.0 months (range 24–95). A complication leading to revision occurred in 21 prostheses (7.8%), 6 (3.7%) in the ASA group and 15 (12.7%) in the RSA group (p < 0.005). The most frequent cause for revision was infection (n = 9; 42.9%). After primary implantation, 3 complications (2.2%) occurred in the ASA and 10 complications (11.0%) in the RSA group (p < 0.005). The complication rate was 2.2% in patients with OA, 13.5% in CTA and 11.9% in PTr. CONCLUSIONS: Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty had a significantly higher rate of complications and revisions than primary and secondary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty, respectively. Therefore, indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty should be critically questioned in each individual case.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9933035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99330352023-02-16 Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty Loew, Markus Schnetzke, Marc Kappes, Sophia Bruckner, Thomas Nolte, Anna-Katharina Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery INTRODUCTION: One current trend in the field of shoulder arthroplasty is a design shift to shorter and metaphyseal fixed humeral stem components. The aim of this investigation is to analyze complications resulting in revision surgery after anatomic (ASA) and reverse (RSA) short stem arthroplasty. We hypothesize that complications are influenced by the type of prosthesis and indication for arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 279 short stem shoulder prostheses were implanted by the same surgeon (162 ASA; 117 RSA), and 223 of these prostheses were implanted as primary procedures; in 54 cases, arthroplasty was performed secondary to prior open surgery. Main indications were osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 134), cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) (n = 74) and posttraumatic deformities (PTr) (n = 59). Patients were evaluated at 6 weeks (follow-up 1; FU1), 2 years (FU2) and the time span of the last follow-up defined as FU3 with a minimum FU of 2 years. Complications were categorized into early complications (within FU1), intermediate complications (within FU2) and late complications (> 2 years; FU3). RESULTS: In total, 268 prostheses (96.1%) were available for FU1; 267 prostheses (95.7%) were available for FU2 and 218 prostheses (77.8%) were available for FU3. The average time for FU3 was 53.0 months (range 24–95). A complication leading to revision occurred in 21 prostheses (7.8%), 6 (3.7%) in the ASA group and 15 (12.7%) in the RSA group (p < 0.005). The most frequent cause for revision was infection (n = 9; 42.9%). After primary implantation, 3 complications (2.2%) occurred in the ASA and 10 complications (11.0%) in the RSA group (p < 0.005). The complication rate was 2.2% in patients with OA, 13.5% in CTA and 11.9% in PTr. CONCLUSIONS: Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty had a significantly higher rate of complications and revisions than primary and secondary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty, respectively. Therefore, indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty should be critically questioned in each individual case. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9933035/ /pubmed/36795151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04802-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Orthopaedic Surgery
Loew, Markus
Schnetzke, Marc
Kappes, Sophia
Bruckner, Thomas
Nolte, Anna-Katharina
Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty
title Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty
title_full Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty
title_fullStr Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty
title_short Complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty
title_sort complications and revisions in anatomic and reverse short stem shoulder arthroplasty
topic Orthopaedic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36795151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04802-4
work_keys_str_mv AT loewmarkus complicationsandrevisionsinanatomicandreverseshortstemshoulderarthroplasty
AT schnetzkemarc complicationsandrevisionsinanatomicandreverseshortstemshoulderarthroplasty
AT kappessophia complicationsandrevisionsinanatomicandreverseshortstemshoulderarthroplasty
AT brucknerthomas complicationsandrevisionsinanatomicandreverseshortstemshoulderarthroplasty
AT nolteannakatharina complicationsandrevisionsinanatomicandreverseshortstemshoulderarthroplasty