Cargando…

Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care

Artificial intelligence (AI), a branch of machine learning (ML) has been increasingly employed in the research of trauma in various aspects. Hemorrhage is the most common cause of trauma-related death. To better elucidate the current role of AI and contribute to future development of ML in trauma ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Henry T., Siddiqui, M. Musaab, Rhind, Shawn G., Zhang, Jing, da Luz, Luis Teodoro, Beckett, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-023-00444-0
_version_ 1784889640512126976
author Peng, Henry T.
Siddiqui, M. Musaab
Rhind, Shawn G.
Zhang, Jing
da Luz, Luis Teodoro
Beckett, Andrew
author_facet Peng, Henry T.
Siddiqui, M. Musaab
Rhind, Shawn G.
Zhang, Jing
da Luz, Luis Teodoro
Beckett, Andrew
author_sort Peng, Henry T.
collection PubMed
description Artificial intelligence (AI), a branch of machine learning (ML) has been increasingly employed in the research of trauma in various aspects. Hemorrhage is the most common cause of trauma-related death. To better elucidate the current role of AI and contribute to future development of ML in trauma care, we conducted a review focused on the use of ML in the diagnosis or treatment strategy of traumatic hemorrhage. A literature search was carried out on PubMed and Google scholar. Titles and abstracts were screened and, if deemed appropriate, the full articles were reviewed. We included 89 studies in the review. These studies could be grouped into five areas: (1) prediction of outcomes; (2) risk assessment and injury severity for triage; (3) prediction of transfusions; (4) detection of hemorrhage; and (5) prediction of coagulopathy. Performance analysis of ML in comparison with current standards for trauma care showed that most studies demonstrated the benefits of ML models. However, most studies were retrospective, focused on prediction of mortality, and development of patient outcome scoring systems. Few studies performed model assessment via test datasets obtained from different sources. Prediction models for transfusions and coagulopathy have been developed, but none is in widespread use. AI-enabled ML-driven technology is becoming integral part of the whole course of trauma care. Comparison and application of ML algorithms using different datasets from initial training, testing and validation in prospective and randomized controlled trials are warranted for provision of decision support for individualized patient care as far forward as possible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40779-023-00444-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9933281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99332812023-02-17 Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care Peng, Henry T. Siddiqui, M. Musaab Rhind, Shawn G. Zhang, Jing da Luz, Luis Teodoro Beckett, Andrew Mil Med Res Review Artificial intelligence (AI), a branch of machine learning (ML) has been increasingly employed in the research of trauma in various aspects. Hemorrhage is the most common cause of trauma-related death. To better elucidate the current role of AI and contribute to future development of ML in trauma care, we conducted a review focused on the use of ML in the diagnosis or treatment strategy of traumatic hemorrhage. A literature search was carried out on PubMed and Google scholar. Titles and abstracts were screened and, if deemed appropriate, the full articles were reviewed. We included 89 studies in the review. These studies could be grouped into five areas: (1) prediction of outcomes; (2) risk assessment and injury severity for triage; (3) prediction of transfusions; (4) detection of hemorrhage; and (5) prediction of coagulopathy. Performance analysis of ML in comparison with current standards for trauma care showed that most studies demonstrated the benefits of ML models. However, most studies were retrospective, focused on prediction of mortality, and development of patient outcome scoring systems. Few studies performed model assessment via test datasets obtained from different sources. Prediction models for transfusions and coagulopathy have been developed, but none is in widespread use. AI-enabled ML-driven technology is becoming integral part of the whole course of trauma care. Comparison and application of ML algorithms using different datasets from initial training, testing and validation in prospective and randomized controlled trials are warranted for provision of decision support for individualized patient care as far forward as possible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40779-023-00444-0. BioMed Central 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9933281/ /pubmed/36793066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-023-00444-0 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Peng, Henry T.
Siddiqui, M. Musaab
Rhind, Shawn G.
Zhang, Jing
da Luz, Luis Teodoro
Beckett, Andrew
Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care
title Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care
title_full Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care
title_short Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care
title_sort artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-023-00444-0
work_keys_str_mv AT penghenryt artificialintelligenceandmachinelearningforhemorrhagictraumacare
AT siddiquimmusaab artificialintelligenceandmachinelearningforhemorrhagictraumacare
AT rhindshawng artificialintelligenceandmachinelearningforhemorrhagictraumacare
AT zhangjing artificialintelligenceandmachinelearningforhemorrhagictraumacare
AT daluzluisteodoro artificialintelligenceandmachinelearningforhemorrhagictraumacare
AT beckettandrew artificialintelligenceandmachinelearningforhemorrhagictraumacare