Cargando…

Brain tumor magnetic resonance images classification based machine learning paradigms

INTRODUCTION: Cancer of the nervous system is one of the most common types of cancer in the world and mostly due to presence of a tumour in the brain. The symptoms and severity of the brain tumour depend on its location. The tumour within the brain may develop from nerves, dura (meningioma), pituita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pattanaik, Baby Barnali, Anitha, Komma, Rathore, Shanti, Biswas, Preesat, Sethy, Prabira Kumar, Behera, Santi Kumari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816391
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2023.124612
_version_ 1784889657879691264
author Pattanaik, Baby Barnali
Anitha, Komma
Rathore, Shanti
Biswas, Preesat
Sethy, Prabira Kumar
Behera, Santi Kumari
author_facet Pattanaik, Baby Barnali
Anitha, Komma
Rathore, Shanti
Biswas, Preesat
Sethy, Prabira Kumar
Behera, Santi Kumari
author_sort Pattanaik, Baby Barnali
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cancer of the nervous system is one of the most common types of cancer in the world and mostly due to presence of a tumour in the brain. The symptoms and severity of the brain tumour depend on its location. The tumour within the brain may develop from nerves, dura (meningioma), pituitary gland (pituitary adenoma), or from the brain tissue itself (glioma). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study we proposed a feature engineering approach for classification magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 3 kinds of most common brain tumour, i.e. glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and no-tumour. Here 5 machine learning classifiers were used, i.e. support vector machine, K-nearest neighbour (KNN), Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, and Ensemble classifier with their paradigms. RESULTS: The handcrafted features such as histogram of oriented gradients, local binary pattern features, and grey level co-occurrence matrix are extracted from the MRI, and the feature fusion technique is adopted to enhance the dimension of feature vector. The Fine KNN outperforms among the classifiers for recognition of 4 kinds of MRI: glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and no tumour, and achieved 91.1% accuracy and 0.95 area under the curve (AUC). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method, i.e. Fine KNN, achieved 91.1% accuracy and 0.96 AUC. Furthermore, this model has the possibility to integrate in low-end devices unlike deep learning, which required a complex system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9933351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99333512023-02-17 Brain tumor magnetic resonance images classification based machine learning paradigms Pattanaik, Baby Barnali Anitha, Komma Rathore, Shanti Biswas, Preesat Sethy, Prabira Kumar Behera, Santi Kumari Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Cancer of the nervous system is one of the most common types of cancer in the world and mostly due to presence of a tumour in the brain. The symptoms and severity of the brain tumour depend on its location. The tumour within the brain may develop from nerves, dura (meningioma), pituitary gland (pituitary adenoma), or from the brain tissue itself (glioma). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study we proposed a feature engineering approach for classification magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 3 kinds of most common brain tumour, i.e. glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and no-tumour. Here 5 machine learning classifiers were used, i.e. support vector machine, K-nearest neighbour (KNN), Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, and Ensemble classifier with their paradigms. RESULTS: The handcrafted features such as histogram of oriented gradients, local binary pattern features, and grey level co-occurrence matrix are extracted from the MRI, and the feature fusion technique is adopted to enhance the dimension of feature vector. The Fine KNN outperforms among the classifiers for recognition of 4 kinds of MRI: glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and no tumour, and achieved 91.1% accuracy and 0.95 area under the curve (AUC). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method, i.e. Fine KNN, achieved 91.1% accuracy and 0.96 AUC. Furthermore, this model has the possibility to integrate in low-end devices unlike deep learning, which required a complex system. Termedia Publishing House 2022-12-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9933351/ /pubmed/36816391 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2023.124612 Text en Copyright © 2022 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Pattanaik, Baby Barnali
Anitha, Komma
Rathore, Shanti
Biswas, Preesat
Sethy, Prabira Kumar
Behera, Santi Kumari
Brain tumor magnetic resonance images classification based machine learning paradigms
title Brain tumor magnetic resonance images classification based machine learning paradigms
title_full Brain tumor magnetic resonance images classification based machine learning paradigms
title_fullStr Brain tumor magnetic resonance images classification based machine learning paradigms
title_full_unstemmed Brain tumor magnetic resonance images classification based machine learning paradigms
title_short Brain tumor magnetic resonance images classification based machine learning paradigms
title_sort brain tumor magnetic resonance images classification based machine learning paradigms
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816391
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2023.124612
work_keys_str_mv AT pattanaikbabybarnali braintumormagneticresonanceimagesclassificationbasedmachinelearningparadigms
AT anithakomma braintumormagneticresonanceimagesclassificationbasedmachinelearningparadigms
AT rathoreshanti braintumormagneticresonanceimagesclassificationbasedmachinelearningparadigms
AT biswaspreesat braintumormagneticresonanceimagesclassificationbasedmachinelearningparadigms
AT sethyprabirakumar braintumormagneticresonanceimagesclassificationbasedmachinelearningparadigms
AT beherasantikumari braintumormagneticresonanceimagesclassificationbasedmachinelearningparadigms