Cargando…

Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers

BACKGROUND: Whether surrogate decision makers regret decisions about the use of life support for incapacitated, critically ill patients remain uncertain. We sought to determine the prevalence of decision regret among surrogates of adult ICU patients and identify factors that influence regret. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersen, Sarah K., Butler, Rachel A., Chang, Chung-Chou H., Arnold, Robert, Angus, Derek C., White, Douglas B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36797793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04332-w
_version_ 1784889671834140672
author Andersen, Sarah K.
Butler, Rachel A.
Chang, Chung-Chou H.
Arnold, Robert
Angus, Derek C.
White, Douglas B.
author_facet Andersen, Sarah K.
Butler, Rachel A.
Chang, Chung-Chou H.
Arnold, Robert
Angus, Derek C.
White, Douglas B.
author_sort Andersen, Sarah K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether surrogate decision makers regret decisions about the use of life support for incapacitated, critically ill patients remain uncertain. We sought to determine the prevalence of decision regret among surrogates of adult ICU patients and identify factors that influence regret. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the PARTNER 2 trial, which tested a family support intervention for surrogates of critically ill adults. At 6-month follow-up, surrogates rated their regret about life support decisions using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more regret. We used multiple linear regression to identify covariates associated with decision regret based on a psychological construct of regret. We constructed two models using the full cohort; model 1 included patient outcomes; model 2 focused on covariates known at the time of ICU decision-making. Subgroup analyses were also conducted based on patient survival status at hospital discharge and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: 748 of 848 surrogates had complete DRS data. The median (IQR) DRS score was 15 (0, 25). Overall, 54% reported mild regret (DRS 5–25), 19% moderate-strong regret (DRS 30–100), and 27% no regret (DRS 0). Poor patient outcome at 6 months (death or severe functional dependence) was associated with more regret in model 1 (β 10.1; 95% C.I. 3.2, 17.0). In model 2, palliative care consultation (3.0; 0.1, 5.9), limitations in life support (LS) prior to death (6.3; 3.1, 9.4) and surrogate black race (6.3; 0.3, 12.3) were associated with more regret. Other modulators of regret in subgroup analyses included surrogate age and education level, surrogate-patient relationship, death in hospital (compared to the post-discharge period), and code status at time of ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: One in five ICU surrogate decision makers experience moderate to strong regret about life support decisions in ICU. Poor patient outcomes are linked to more regret. Decisions to limit life support prior to patient death may also increase regret. Future studies are needed to understand how regret relates to decision quality and how to lessen lasting regret. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04332-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9933411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99334112023-02-17 Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers Andersen, Sarah K. Butler, Rachel A. Chang, Chung-Chou H. Arnold, Robert Angus, Derek C. White, Douglas B. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Whether surrogate decision makers regret decisions about the use of life support for incapacitated, critically ill patients remain uncertain. We sought to determine the prevalence of decision regret among surrogates of adult ICU patients and identify factors that influence regret. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the PARTNER 2 trial, which tested a family support intervention for surrogates of critically ill adults. At 6-month follow-up, surrogates rated their regret about life support decisions using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more regret. We used multiple linear regression to identify covariates associated with decision regret based on a psychological construct of regret. We constructed two models using the full cohort; model 1 included patient outcomes; model 2 focused on covariates known at the time of ICU decision-making. Subgroup analyses were also conducted based on patient survival status at hospital discharge and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: 748 of 848 surrogates had complete DRS data. The median (IQR) DRS score was 15 (0, 25). Overall, 54% reported mild regret (DRS 5–25), 19% moderate-strong regret (DRS 30–100), and 27% no regret (DRS 0). Poor patient outcome at 6 months (death or severe functional dependence) was associated with more regret in model 1 (β 10.1; 95% C.I. 3.2, 17.0). In model 2, palliative care consultation (3.0; 0.1, 5.9), limitations in life support (LS) prior to death (6.3; 3.1, 9.4) and surrogate black race (6.3; 0.3, 12.3) were associated with more regret. Other modulators of regret in subgroup analyses included surrogate age and education level, surrogate-patient relationship, death in hospital (compared to the post-discharge period), and code status at time of ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: One in five ICU surrogate decision makers experience moderate to strong regret about life support decisions in ICU. Poor patient outcomes are linked to more regret. Decisions to limit life support prior to patient death may also increase regret. Future studies are needed to understand how regret relates to decision quality and how to lessen lasting regret. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04332-w. BioMed Central 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9933411/ /pubmed/36797793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04332-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Andersen, Sarah K.
Butler, Rachel A.
Chang, Chung-Chou H.
Arnold, Robert
Angus, Derek C.
White, Douglas B.
Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers
title Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers
title_full Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers
title_fullStr Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers
title_short Prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of ICU surrogate decision makers
title_sort prevalence of long-term decision regret and associated risk factors in a large cohort of icu surrogate decision makers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36797793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04332-w
work_keys_str_mv AT andersensarahk prevalenceoflongtermdecisionregretandassociatedriskfactorsinalargecohortoficusurrogatedecisionmakers
AT butlerrachela prevalenceoflongtermdecisionregretandassociatedriskfactorsinalargecohortoficusurrogatedecisionmakers
AT changchungchouh prevalenceoflongtermdecisionregretandassociatedriskfactorsinalargecohortoficusurrogatedecisionmakers
AT arnoldrobert prevalenceoflongtermdecisionregretandassociatedriskfactorsinalargecohortoficusurrogatedecisionmakers
AT angusderekc prevalenceoflongtermdecisionregretandassociatedriskfactorsinalargecohortoficusurrogatedecisionmakers
AT whitedouglasb prevalenceoflongtermdecisionregretandassociatedriskfactorsinalargecohortoficusurrogatedecisionmakers