Cargando…

Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge

[Image: see text] Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential technology to mitigate global CO(2) emissions from power and industry sectors. Despite the increasing recognition of its importance to achieve the net-zero target, current CCS deployment is far behind targeted ambitions. A key reason...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Subraveti, Sai Gokul, Rodríguez Angel, Elda, Ramírez, Andrea, Roussanaly, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36731169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05724
_version_ 1784889698563391488
author Subraveti, Sai Gokul
Rodríguez Angel, Elda
Ramírez, Andrea
Roussanaly, Simon
author_facet Subraveti, Sai Gokul
Rodríguez Angel, Elda
Ramírez, Andrea
Roussanaly, Simon
author_sort Subraveti, Sai Gokul
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential technology to mitigate global CO(2) emissions from power and industry sectors. Despite the increasing recognition of its importance to achieve the net-zero target, current CCS deployment is far behind targeted ambitions. A key reason is that CCS is often perceived as too expensive. The costs of CCS have however traditionally been looked at from the industrial plant perspective, which does not necessarily reflect the end user’s one. This paper addresses the incomplete view by investigating the impact of implementing CCS in industrial facilities on the overall costs and CO(2) emissions of end-user products and services. As an example, we examine the extent to which an increase in costs of raw materials (cement and steel) due to CCS impacts the costs of building a bridge. Results show that although CCS significantly increases cement and steel costs, the subsequent increment in the overall bridge construction cost remains marginal (∼1%). This 1% cost increase, however, enables a deep reduction in CO(2) emissions (∼51%) associated with the bridge construction. Although more research is needed in this area, this work is the first step to a better understanding of the real cost and benefits of CCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9933526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99335262023-02-17 Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge Subraveti, Sai Gokul Rodríguez Angel, Elda Ramírez, Andrea Roussanaly, Simon Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential technology to mitigate global CO(2) emissions from power and industry sectors. Despite the increasing recognition of its importance to achieve the net-zero target, current CCS deployment is far behind targeted ambitions. A key reason is that CCS is often perceived as too expensive. The costs of CCS have however traditionally been looked at from the industrial plant perspective, which does not necessarily reflect the end user’s one. This paper addresses the incomplete view by investigating the impact of implementing CCS in industrial facilities on the overall costs and CO(2) emissions of end-user products and services. As an example, we examine the extent to which an increase in costs of raw materials (cement and steel) due to CCS impacts the costs of building a bridge. Results show that although CCS significantly increases cement and steel costs, the subsequent increment in the overall bridge construction cost remains marginal (∼1%). This 1% cost increase, however, enables a deep reduction in CO(2) emissions (∼51%) associated with the bridge construction. Although more research is needed in this area, this work is the first step to a better understanding of the real cost and benefits of CCS. American Chemical Society 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9933526/ /pubmed/36731169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05724 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Subraveti, Sai Gokul
Rodríguez Angel, Elda
Ramírez, Andrea
Roussanaly, Simon
Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge
title Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge
title_full Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge
title_fullStr Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge
title_full_unstemmed Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge
title_short Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge
title_sort is carbon capture and storage (ccs) really so expensive? an analysis of cascading costs and co(2) emissions reduction of industrial ccs implementation on the construction of a bridge
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36731169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05724
work_keys_str_mv AT subravetisaigokul iscarboncaptureandstorageccsreallysoexpensiveananalysisofcascadingcostsandco2emissionsreductionofindustrialccsimplementationontheconstructionofabridge
AT rodriguezangelelda iscarboncaptureandstorageccsreallysoexpensiveananalysisofcascadingcostsandco2emissionsreductionofindustrialccsimplementationontheconstructionofabridge
AT ramirezandrea iscarboncaptureandstorageccsreallysoexpensiveananalysisofcascadingcostsandco2emissionsreductionofindustrialccsimplementationontheconstructionofabridge
AT roussanalysimon iscarboncaptureandstorageccsreallysoexpensiveananalysisofcascadingcostsandco2emissionsreductionofindustrialccsimplementationontheconstructionofabridge