Cargando…
Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge
[Image: see text] Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential technology to mitigate global CO(2) emissions from power and industry sectors. Despite the increasing recognition of its importance to achieve the net-zero target, current CCS deployment is far behind targeted ambitions. A key reason...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36731169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05724 |
_version_ | 1784889698563391488 |
---|---|
author | Subraveti, Sai Gokul Rodríguez Angel, Elda Ramírez, Andrea Roussanaly, Simon |
author_facet | Subraveti, Sai Gokul Rodríguez Angel, Elda Ramírez, Andrea Roussanaly, Simon |
author_sort | Subraveti, Sai Gokul |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential technology to mitigate global CO(2) emissions from power and industry sectors. Despite the increasing recognition of its importance to achieve the net-zero target, current CCS deployment is far behind targeted ambitions. A key reason is that CCS is often perceived as too expensive. The costs of CCS have however traditionally been looked at from the industrial plant perspective, which does not necessarily reflect the end user’s one. This paper addresses the incomplete view by investigating the impact of implementing CCS in industrial facilities on the overall costs and CO(2) emissions of end-user products and services. As an example, we examine the extent to which an increase in costs of raw materials (cement and steel) due to CCS impacts the costs of building a bridge. Results show that although CCS significantly increases cement and steel costs, the subsequent increment in the overall bridge construction cost remains marginal (∼1%). This 1% cost increase, however, enables a deep reduction in CO(2) emissions (∼51%) associated with the bridge construction. Although more research is needed in this area, this work is the first step to a better understanding of the real cost and benefits of CCS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9933526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99335262023-02-17 Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge Subraveti, Sai Gokul Rodríguez Angel, Elda Ramírez, Andrea Roussanaly, Simon Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential technology to mitigate global CO(2) emissions from power and industry sectors. Despite the increasing recognition of its importance to achieve the net-zero target, current CCS deployment is far behind targeted ambitions. A key reason is that CCS is often perceived as too expensive. The costs of CCS have however traditionally been looked at from the industrial plant perspective, which does not necessarily reflect the end user’s one. This paper addresses the incomplete view by investigating the impact of implementing CCS in industrial facilities on the overall costs and CO(2) emissions of end-user products and services. As an example, we examine the extent to which an increase in costs of raw materials (cement and steel) due to CCS impacts the costs of building a bridge. Results show that although CCS significantly increases cement and steel costs, the subsequent increment in the overall bridge construction cost remains marginal (∼1%). This 1% cost increase, however, enables a deep reduction in CO(2) emissions (∼51%) associated with the bridge construction. Although more research is needed in this area, this work is the first step to a better understanding of the real cost and benefits of CCS. American Chemical Society 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9933526/ /pubmed/36731169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05724 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Subraveti, Sai Gokul Rodríguez Angel, Elda Ramírez, Andrea Roussanaly, Simon Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge |
title | Is
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive?
An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction
of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge |
title_full | Is
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive?
An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction
of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge |
title_fullStr | Is
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive?
An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction
of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge |
title_full_unstemmed | Is
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive?
An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction
of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge |
title_short | Is
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive?
An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO(2) Emissions Reduction
of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge |
title_sort | is
carbon capture and storage (ccs) really so expensive?
an analysis of cascading costs and co(2) emissions reduction
of industrial ccs implementation on the construction of a bridge |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36731169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05724 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT subravetisaigokul iscarboncaptureandstorageccsreallysoexpensiveananalysisofcascadingcostsandco2emissionsreductionofindustrialccsimplementationontheconstructionofabridge AT rodriguezangelelda iscarboncaptureandstorageccsreallysoexpensiveananalysisofcascadingcostsandco2emissionsreductionofindustrialccsimplementationontheconstructionofabridge AT ramirezandrea iscarboncaptureandstorageccsreallysoexpensiveananalysisofcascadingcostsandco2emissionsreductionofindustrialccsimplementationontheconstructionofabridge AT roussanalysimon iscarboncaptureandstorageccsreallysoexpensiveananalysisofcascadingcostsandco2emissionsreductionofindustrialccsimplementationontheconstructionofabridge |