Cargando…

Evaluation of the quality of clinical guidelines for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in urological surgeries by the AGREE II review instrument

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common cause of death during the first 30 days after surgery. There is not any study which critically evaluated clinical guidelines related to VTE prophylaxis in urological surgeries. Therefore, in this study, we decided to evaluate relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shakiba, Behnam, Kabir, Ali, Irani, Shirin, Torabi, Nasim, Nourmohamad, Vahid, Farid, Mohaddese
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1118
_version_ 1784889718143451136
author Shakiba, Behnam
Kabir, Ali
Irani, Shirin
Torabi, Nasim
Nourmohamad, Vahid
Farid, Mohaddese
author_facet Shakiba, Behnam
Kabir, Ali
Irani, Shirin
Torabi, Nasim
Nourmohamad, Vahid
Farid, Mohaddese
author_sort Shakiba, Behnam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common cause of death during the first 30 days after surgery. There is not any study which critically evaluated clinical guidelines related to VTE prophylaxis in urological surgeries. Therefore, in this study, we decided to evaluate related clinical guidelines using the AGREE II instrument to take a positive step towards improving the care of these patients. METHODS: The latest version of all available clinical guidelines related to the topic of VTE prophylaxis in urological surgeries until 2021 was searched. Four appraisers, including one urologist, one cardiologist, one epidemiologist, and one MD who had prior knowledge of working with the AGREE II tool and international articles in this field appraised selected clinical guidelines. Using the AGREE II review tool, clinical guidelines were critically evaluated. Then, the score of six domains of AGREE II for each guideline was calculated and compared with each other, and the relationship between the domains was measured by Kendall's correlation test. To determine the reliability of the test, interclass correlation coefficients were calculated for all indicators. RESULTS: Items were rated on a 7‐point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). NICE, CHEST, and EAU guidelines obtained the highest scores from the Overall Assessment criteria by scoring 6, 5.75, and 5.25, respectively. There was only a correlation between the score of Overall Assessment criterion with “Applicability” domain, with Kendall's correlation coefficient of 0.867 and p = 0.015. The domains of “Clarity and presentation” and “Scope and purpose” obtained the highest standardized scores by getting 84.49% and 75.69%, respectively, and “Applicability” with 30.04% obtained the lowest standardized score. CONCLUSION: In this study, NICE, CHEST, and EAU guidelines are suggested as clinical guidelines by obtaining the highest scores from Overall Assessment criterion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9933655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99336552023-02-17 Evaluation of the quality of clinical guidelines for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in urological surgeries by the AGREE II review instrument Shakiba, Behnam Kabir, Ali Irani, Shirin Torabi, Nasim Nourmohamad, Vahid Farid, Mohaddese Health Sci Rep Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common cause of death during the first 30 days after surgery. There is not any study which critically evaluated clinical guidelines related to VTE prophylaxis in urological surgeries. Therefore, in this study, we decided to evaluate related clinical guidelines using the AGREE II instrument to take a positive step towards improving the care of these patients. METHODS: The latest version of all available clinical guidelines related to the topic of VTE prophylaxis in urological surgeries until 2021 was searched. Four appraisers, including one urologist, one cardiologist, one epidemiologist, and one MD who had prior knowledge of working with the AGREE II tool and international articles in this field appraised selected clinical guidelines. Using the AGREE II review tool, clinical guidelines were critically evaluated. Then, the score of six domains of AGREE II for each guideline was calculated and compared with each other, and the relationship between the domains was measured by Kendall's correlation test. To determine the reliability of the test, interclass correlation coefficients were calculated for all indicators. RESULTS: Items were rated on a 7‐point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). NICE, CHEST, and EAU guidelines obtained the highest scores from the Overall Assessment criteria by scoring 6, 5.75, and 5.25, respectively. There was only a correlation between the score of Overall Assessment criterion with “Applicability” domain, with Kendall's correlation coefficient of 0.867 and p = 0.015. The domains of “Clarity and presentation” and “Scope and purpose” obtained the highest standardized scores by getting 84.49% and 75.69%, respectively, and “Applicability” with 30.04% obtained the lowest standardized score. CONCLUSION: In this study, NICE, CHEST, and EAU guidelines are suggested as clinical guidelines by obtaining the highest scores from Overall Assessment criterion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9933655/ /pubmed/36817626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1118 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shakiba, Behnam
Kabir, Ali
Irani, Shirin
Torabi, Nasim
Nourmohamad, Vahid
Farid, Mohaddese
Evaluation of the quality of clinical guidelines for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in urological surgeries by the AGREE II review instrument
title Evaluation of the quality of clinical guidelines for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in urological surgeries by the AGREE II review instrument
title_full Evaluation of the quality of clinical guidelines for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in urological surgeries by the AGREE II review instrument
title_fullStr Evaluation of the quality of clinical guidelines for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in urological surgeries by the AGREE II review instrument
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the quality of clinical guidelines for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in urological surgeries by the AGREE II review instrument
title_short Evaluation of the quality of clinical guidelines for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in urological surgeries by the AGREE II review instrument
title_sort evaluation of the quality of clinical guidelines for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in urological surgeries by the agree ii review instrument
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1118
work_keys_str_mv AT shakibabehnam evaluationofthequalityofclinicalguidelinesforprophylaxisofvenousthromboembolisminurologicalsurgeriesbytheagreeiireviewinstrument
AT kabirali evaluationofthequalityofclinicalguidelinesforprophylaxisofvenousthromboembolisminurologicalsurgeriesbytheagreeiireviewinstrument
AT iranishirin evaluationofthequalityofclinicalguidelinesforprophylaxisofvenousthromboembolisminurologicalsurgeriesbytheagreeiireviewinstrument
AT torabinasim evaluationofthequalityofclinicalguidelinesforprophylaxisofvenousthromboembolisminurologicalsurgeriesbytheagreeiireviewinstrument
AT nourmohamadvahid evaluationofthequalityofclinicalguidelinesforprophylaxisofvenousthromboembolisminurologicalsurgeriesbytheagreeiireviewinstrument
AT faridmohaddese evaluationofthequalityofclinicalguidelinesforprophylaxisofvenousthromboembolisminurologicalsurgeriesbytheagreeiireviewinstrument