Cargando…

Predicting total knee replacement at 2 and 5 years in osteoarthritis patients using machine learning

OBJECTIVES: Knee osteoarthritis is a major cause of physical disability and reduced quality of life, with end-stage disease often treated by total knee replacement (TKR). We set out to develop and externally validate a machine learning model capable of predicting the need for a TKR in 2 and 5 years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahmoud, Khadija, Alagha, M Abdulhadi, Nowinka, Zuzanna, Jones, Gareth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000141
_version_ 1784889719739383808
author Mahmoud, Khadija
Alagha, M Abdulhadi
Nowinka, Zuzanna
Jones, Gareth
author_facet Mahmoud, Khadija
Alagha, M Abdulhadi
Nowinka, Zuzanna
Jones, Gareth
author_sort Mahmoud, Khadija
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Knee osteoarthritis is a major cause of physical disability and reduced quality of life, with end-stage disease often treated by total knee replacement (TKR). We set out to develop and externally validate a machine learning model capable of predicting the need for a TKR in 2 and 5 years time using routinely collected health data. DESIGN: A prospective study using datasets Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and the Multicentre Osteoarthritis Study (MOST). OAI data were used to train the models while MOST data formed the external test set. The data were preprocessed using feature selection to curate 45 candidate features including demographics, medical history, imaging assessments, history of intervention and outcome. SETTING: The study was conducted using two multicentre USA-based datasets of participants with or at high risk of knee OA. PARTICIPANTS: The study excluded participants with at least one existing TKR. OAI dataset included participants aged 45–79 years of which 3234 were used for training and 809 for internal testing, while MOST involved participants aged 50–79 and 2248 were used for external testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was prediction of TKR onset at 2 and 5 years. Performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) and F1-score and key predictors identified. RESULTS: For the best performing model (gradient boosting machine), the AUC at 2 years was 0.913 (95% CI 0.876 to 0.951), and at 5 years 0.873 (95% CI 0.839 to 0.907). Radiographic-derived features, questionnaire-based assessments alongside the patient’s educational attainment were key predictors for these models. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach suggests that routinely collected patient data are sufficient to drive a predictive model with a clinically acceptable level of accuracy (AUC>0.7) and is the first such tool to be externally validated. This level of accuracy is higher than previously published models utilising MRI data, which is not routinely collected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9933661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99336612023-02-17 Predicting total knee replacement at 2 and 5 years in osteoarthritis patients using machine learning Mahmoud, Khadija Alagha, M Abdulhadi Nowinka, Zuzanna Jones, Gareth BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol Original Research OBJECTIVES: Knee osteoarthritis is a major cause of physical disability and reduced quality of life, with end-stage disease often treated by total knee replacement (TKR). We set out to develop and externally validate a machine learning model capable of predicting the need for a TKR in 2 and 5 years time using routinely collected health data. DESIGN: A prospective study using datasets Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and the Multicentre Osteoarthritis Study (MOST). OAI data were used to train the models while MOST data formed the external test set. The data were preprocessed using feature selection to curate 45 candidate features including demographics, medical history, imaging assessments, history of intervention and outcome. SETTING: The study was conducted using two multicentre USA-based datasets of participants with or at high risk of knee OA. PARTICIPANTS: The study excluded participants with at least one existing TKR. OAI dataset included participants aged 45–79 years of which 3234 were used for training and 809 for internal testing, while MOST involved participants aged 50–79 and 2248 were used for external testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was prediction of TKR onset at 2 and 5 years. Performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) and F1-score and key predictors identified. RESULTS: For the best performing model (gradient boosting machine), the AUC at 2 years was 0.913 (95% CI 0.876 to 0.951), and at 5 years 0.873 (95% CI 0.839 to 0.907). Radiographic-derived features, questionnaire-based assessments alongside the patient’s educational attainment were key predictors for these models. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach suggests that routinely collected patient data are sufficient to drive a predictive model with a clinically acceptable level of accuracy (AUC>0.7) and is the first such tool to be externally validated. This level of accuracy is higher than previously published models utilising MRI data, which is not routinely collected. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9933661/ /pubmed/36817624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000141 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Mahmoud, Khadija
Alagha, M Abdulhadi
Nowinka, Zuzanna
Jones, Gareth
Predicting total knee replacement at 2 and 5 years in osteoarthritis patients using machine learning
title Predicting total knee replacement at 2 and 5 years in osteoarthritis patients using machine learning
title_full Predicting total knee replacement at 2 and 5 years in osteoarthritis patients using machine learning
title_fullStr Predicting total knee replacement at 2 and 5 years in osteoarthritis patients using machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Predicting total knee replacement at 2 and 5 years in osteoarthritis patients using machine learning
title_short Predicting total knee replacement at 2 and 5 years in osteoarthritis patients using machine learning
title_sort predicting total knee replacement at 2 and 5 years in osteoarthritis patients using machine learning
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000141
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudkhadija predictingtotalkneereplacementat2and5yearsinosteoarthritispatientsusingmachinelearning
AT alaghamabdulhadi predictingtotalkneereplacementat2and5yearsinosteoarthritispatientsusingmachinelearning
AT nowinkazuzanna predictingtotalkneereplacementat2and5yearsinosteoarthritispatientsusingmachinelearning
AT jonesgareth predictingtotalkneereplacementat2and5yearsinosteoarthritispatientsusingmachinelearning