Cargando…

Need to clamp indwelling urinary catheters before removal after different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of bladder training by clamping on bladder urethral function in patients with indwelling urinary catheters used for different durations. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: The UpToDate, Cochrane Library, OVID, PubMed,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Sumin, Gu, Jiayi, Fan, Xiaoyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36792329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064075
_version_ 1784889739055202304
author Ma, Sumin
Gu, Jiayi
Fan, Xiaoyan
author_facet Ma, Sumin
Gu, Jiayi
Fan, Xiaoyan
author_sort Ma, Sumin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of bladder training by clamping on bladder urethral function in patients with indwelling urinary catheters used for different durations. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: The UpToDate, Cochrane Library, OVID, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CINAHL and Embase were screened from 1 January 2000 to 28 February 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental designs comparing the efficacy of bladder training in patients with an indwelling urinary catheter by clamping or free drainage before urinary catheter removal were published in English or Chinese. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of studies. Continuous variables were analysed using mean difference and standardised mean difference (SMD) values with a 95% CI. Categorical variables were analysed using relative risk (RR) and 95% CI. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was urinary tract infection incidence, and secondary outcomes included hours to first voiding, incidence of urinary retention and recatheterisation and residual urine volume. RESULTS: Seventeen papers (15 RCTs and 2 quasi-RCTs) comprising 3908 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results of the meta-analysis showed that the clamping group had a significantly higher risk of urinary tract infections (RR=1.47; 95% CI 1.26 to 1.72; p<0.00001) and a longer hour to first void (SMD=0.19; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.29; p=0.0004) compared with the free drainage group. Subgroup analysis of indwelling urinary catheter use durations of ≤7 days indicated that clamping significantly increased the risk of urinary tract infection (RR=1.69; 95% CI 1.42 to 2.02, p<0.00001) and lengthens the interval to first void (SMD=0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.41, p=0.0008) compared with free drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder training by clamping indwelling urinary catheters increases the incidence of urinary tract infection and lengthens the hours to first void in patients with indwelling urinary catheters use durations of ≤7 days compared with the free drainage. However, the effect of clamping training on patients with an indwelling urinary catheter use duration of >7 days is unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9933763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99337632023-02-17 Need to clamp indwelling urinary catheters before removal after different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ma, Sumin Gu, Jiayi Fan, Xiaoyan BMJ Open Urology OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of bladder training by clamping on bladder urethral function in patients with indwelling urinary catheters used for different durations. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: The UpToDate, Cochrane Library, OVID, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CINAHL and Embase were screened from 1 January 2000 to 28 February 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental designs comparing the efficacy of bladder training in patients with an indwelling urinary catheter by clamping or free drainage before urinary catheter removal were published in English or Chinese. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of studies. Continuous variables were analysed using mean difference and standardised mean difference (SMD) values with a 95% CI. Categorical variables were analysed using relative risk (RR) and 95% CI. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was urinary tract infection incidence, and secondary outcomes included hours to first voiding, incidence of urinary retention and recatheterisation and residual urine volume. RESULTS: Seventeen papers (15 RCTs and 2 quasi-RCTs) comprising 3908 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results of the meta-analysis showed that the clamping group had a significantly higher risk of urinary tract infections (RR=1.47; 95% CI 1.26 to 1.72; p<0.00001) and a longer hour to first void (SMD=0.19; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.29; p=0.0004) compared with the free drainage group. Subgroup analysis of indwelling urinary catheter use durations of ≤7 days indicated that clamping significantly increased the risk of urinary tract infection (RR=1.69; 95% CI 1.42 to 2.02, p<0.00001) and lengthens the interval to first void (SMD=0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.41, p=0.0008) compared with free drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder training by clamping indwelling urinary catheters increases the incidence of urinary tract infection and lengthens the hours to first void in patients with indwelling urinary catheters use durations of ≤7 days compared with the free drainage. However, the effect of clamping training on patients with an indwelling urinary catheter use duration of >7 days is unclear. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9933763/ /pubmed/36792329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064075 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Urology
Ma, Sumin
Gu, Jiayi
Fan, Xiaoyan
Need to clamp indwelling urinary catheters before removal after different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Need to clamp indwelling urinary catheters before removal after different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Need to clamp indwelling urinary catheters before removal after different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Need to clamp indwelling urinary catheters before removal after different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Need to clamp indwelling urinary catheters before removal after different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Need to clamp indwelling urinary catheters before removal after different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort need to clamp indwelling urinary catheters before removal after different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36792329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064075
work_keys_str_mv AT masumin needtoclampindwellingurinarycathetersbeforeremovalafterdifferentdurationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gujiayi needtoclampindwellingurinarycathetersbeforeremovalafterdifferentdurationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fanxiaoyan needtoclampindwellingurinarycathetersbeforeremovalafterdifferentdurationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis