Cargando…
Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non–lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic
Both shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) are recommended as the first choice for non-lower pole kidney stones. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost of SWL versus F-URS in patients with solitary non-lower pole kidney sto...
Autores principales: | Bai, Song, Zhan, Yunhong, Pan, Chunyu, Liu, Gang, Li, Jia, Shan, Liping |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9933802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36795174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01412-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones
por: Knoll, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy for renal stones?
por: Ferraro, Pietro Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparison of Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy in the Treatment of 10–20 mm Lower Pole Stone: Prospective Non-randomized Study
por: Kezer, Cem
Publicado: (2022) -
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi
por: Fankhauser, Christian D, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi
por: Fankhauser, Christian D, et al.
Publicado: (2018)