Cargando…

Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension (BLIS) supports microbial growth when artificially inoculated and to evaluate liposomal stability in the face of this extrinsic contamination as evidenced by changes in free bupivacaine concentrations. STUDY DESIGN: A random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallace, Amber, Love, Lydia, Gensler, Catherine, Jacob, Megan, Robertson, James, Messenger, Kristen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36795683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281768
_version_ 1784889869844086784
author Wallace, Amber
Love, Lydia
Gensler, Catherine
Jacob, Megan
Robertson, James
Messenger, Kristen
author_facet Wallace, Amber
Love, Lydia
Gensler, Catherine
Jacob, Megan
Robertson, James
Messenger, Kristen
author_sort Wallace, Amber
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension (BLIS) supports microbial growth when artificially inoculated and to evaluate liposomal stability in the face of this extrinsic contamination as evidenced by changes in free bupivacaine concentrations. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, prospective in vitro study in which three vials of each BLIS, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol were individually inoculated with known concentrations of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans (n = 36) to quantify bacterial and fungal growth was conducted. Over 120 hours, aliquots from contaminated vials were withdrawn, plated, and incubated to determine microbial concentrations. High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to evaluate free bupivacaine concentrations over time in BLIS. Data were analyzed using a mixed effects model with multiple comparisons. SAMPLE POPULATION: Twelve vials of each BLIS, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol. RESULTS: BLIS did not support significant growth of Staphylococcus aureus or Candida albicans at any time. BLIS supported significant growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa beginning at the 24 hour time point. Bupivacaine 0.5% did not support significant growth of any organisms. Propofol supported significant growth of all organisms. Free bupivacaine concentrations changed minimally over time. CONCLUSION: Bacterial and fungal contaminant growth in artificially inoculated BLIS is organism dependent. BLIS supports significant growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Extra-label handling of BLIS should only be undertaken with caution and with adherence to strict aseptic technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9934369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99343692023-02-17 Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol Wallace, Amber Love, Lydia Gensler, Catherine Jacob, Megan Robertson, James Messenger, Kristen PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension (BLIS) supports microbial growth when artificially inoculated and to evaluate liposomal stability in the face of this extrinsic contamination as evidenced by changes in free bupivacaine concentrations. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, prospective in vitro study in which three vials of each BLIS, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol were individually inoculated with known concentrations of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans (n = 36) to quantify bacterial and fungal growth was conducted. Over 120 hours, aliquots from contaminated vials were withdrawn, plated, and incubated to determine microbial concentrations. High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to evaluate free bupivacaine concentrations over time in BLIS. Data were analyzed using a mixed effects model with multiple comparisons. SAMPLE POPULATION: Twelve vials of each BLIS, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol. RESULTS: BLIS did not support significant growth of Staphylococcus aureus or Candida albicans at any time. BLIS supported significant growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa beginning at the 24 hour time point. Bupivacaine 0.5% did not support significant growth of any organisms. Propofol supported significant growth of all organisms. Free bupivacaine concentrations changed minimally over time. CONCLUSION: Bacterial and fungal contaminant growth in artificially inoculated BLIS is organism dependent. BLIS supports significant growth of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Extra-label handling of BLIS should only be undertaken with caution and with adherence to strict aseptic technique. Public Library of Science 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9934369/ /pubmed/36795683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281768 Text en © 2023 Wallace et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wallace, Amber
Love, Lydia
Gensler, Catherine
Jacob, Megan
Robertson, James
Messenger, Kristen
Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol
title Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol
title_full Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol
title_fullStr Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol
title_full_unstemmed Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol
title_short Comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol
title_sort comparative growth dynamics of bacterial and fungal contaminants in bupivacaine liposomal injectable suspension, bupivacaine 0.5%, and propofol
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36795683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281768
work_keys_str_mv AT wallaceamber comparativegrowthdynamicsofbacterialandfungalcontaminantsinbupivacaineliposomalinjectablesuspensionbupivacaine05andpropofol
AT lovelydia comparativegrowthdynamicsofbacterialandfungalcontaminantsinbupivacaineliposomalinjectablesuspensionbupivacaine05andpropofol
AT genslercatherine comparativegrowthdynamicsofbacterialandfungalcontaminantsinbupivacaineliposomalinjectablesuspensionbupivacaine05andpropofol
AT jacobmegan comparativegrowthdynamicsofbacterialandfungalcontaminantsinbupivacaineliposomalinjectablesuspensionbupivacaine05andpropofol
AT robertsonjames comparativegrowthdynamicsofbacterialandfungalcontaminantsinbupivacaineliposomalinjectablesuspensionbupivacaine05andpropofol
AT messengerkristen comparativegrowthdynamicsofbacterialandfungalcontaminantsinbupivacaineliposomalinjectablesuspensionbupivacaine05andpropofol