Cargando…

Patient Comfort During Postop Period in Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Opioid and Opioid-Free Anesthesia

Background: Anesthetic management practices have advanced to opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) often replacing opioids in oncologic surgeries. The study was conducted to find the quality of recovery (QoR) of patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries receiving OFA. Methods: A double-blinded, randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnasamy Yuvaraj, Aravindhan, Gayathri, Balasubramaniam, Balasubramanian, Natarajan, Mirunalini, Gunaseelan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819361
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33871
_version_ 1784889972610826240
author Krishnasamy Yuvaraj, Aravindhan
Gayathri, Balasubramaniam
Balasubramanian, Natarajan
Mirunalini, Gunaseelan
author_facet Krishnasamy Yuvaraj, Aravindhan
Gayathri, Balasubramaniam
Balasubramanian, Natarajan
Mirunalini, Gunaseelan
author_sort Krishnasamy Yuvaraj, Aravindhan
collection PubMed
description Background: Anesthetic management practices have advanced to opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) often replacing opioids in oncologic surgeries. The study was conducted to find the quality of recovery (QoR) of patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries receiving OFA. Methods: A double-blinded, randomized controlled study was conducted with 60 patients randomized to group OFA and group OA (opioid anesthesia). Group OFA received one-time dosing of ketamine 0.3 mg/kg, lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg, and dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg. Group OA received fentanyl 2mcg/kg. Intraoperatively, Group OFA received dexmedetomidine 0.4 mcg/kg/h and the OA group received fentanyl 0.5 mcg/kg/h infusion. Bispectral index (BIS), hemodynamics, muscle relaxant administration, and sevoflurane concentration were noted. A modified QoR-40 score was used to assess the quality of recovery in the postoperative period. Results: A higher QoR-40 score was found in the OA group (median 182, IQR 178-186) compared to the OFA group (median 180, IQR 178-184). Out of the five components, the patient's emotional state was better in the group OA (39.9±2.77) than in the OFA group (37.9±2.77). The patient's physical comfort was found to be better in the group OFA (52.52±3.23) compared to group OA (50.93±3.23). Physical independence, psychological support, and pain were comparable between the two groups. Patients in group OFA received less sevoflurane, a muscle relaxant, and showed a mild reduction in heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) when compared to group OA. The time taken to reach a Modified Aldrete score of 9 was high in OFA (11.47±2.16) and (9.17±1.09) when compared to group OA. No significant differences were noted with the visual analog score (VAS) score, Ramsay sedation score, and modified post-anesthesia discharge scoring system (PADSS) score. Conclusion: We conclude that the quality of recovery of patients receiving opioid-free methods of anesthesia was not inferior to OA in patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9934931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99349312023-02-17 Patient Comfort During Postop Period in Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Opioid and Opioid-Free Anesthesia Krishnasamy Yuvaraj, Aravindhan Gayathri, Balasubramaniam Balasubramanian, Natarajan Mirunalini, Gunaseelan Cureus Anesthesiology Background: Anesthetic management practices have advanced to opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) often replacing opioids in oncologic surgeries. The study was conducted to find the quality of recovery (QoR) of patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries receiving OFA. Methods: A double-blinded, randomized controlled study was conducted with 60 patients randomized to group OFA and group OA (opioid anesthesia). Group OFA received one-time dosing of ketamine 0.3 mg/kg, lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg, and dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg. Group OA received fentanyl 2mcg/kg. Intraoperatively, Group OFA received dexmedetomidine 0.4 mcg/kg/h and the OA group received fentanyl 0.5 mcg/kg/h infusion. Bispectral index (BIS), hemodynamics, muscle relaxant administration, and sevoflurane concentration were noted. A modified QoR-40 score was used to assess the quality of recovery in the postoperative period. Results: A higher QoR-40 score was found in the OA group (median 182, IQR 178-186) compared to the OFA group (median 180, IQR 178-184). Out of the five components, the patient's emotional state was better in the group OA (39.9±2.77) than in the OFA group (37.9±2.77). The patient's physical comfort was found to be better in the group OFA (52.52±3.23) compared to group OA (50.93±3.23). Physical independence, psychological support, and pain were comparable between the two groups. Patients in group OFA received less sevoflurane, a muscle relaxant, and showed a mild reduction in heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) when compared to group OA. The time taken to reach a Modified Aldrete score of 9 was high in OFA (11.47±2.16) and (9.17±1.09) when compared to group OA. No significant differences were noted with the visual analog score (VAS) score, Ramsay sedation score, and modified post-anesthesia discharge scoring system (PADSS) score. Conclusion: We conclude that the quality of recovery of patients receiving opioid-free methods of anesthesia was not inferior to OA in patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries. Cureus 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9934931/ /pubmed/36819361 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33871 Text en Copyright © 2023, Krishnasamy Yuvaraj et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Krishnasamy Yuvaraj, Aravindhan
Gayathri, Balasubramaniam
Balasubramanian, Natarajan
Mirunalini, Gunaseelan
Patient Comfort During Postop Period in Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Opioid and Opioid-Free Anesthesia
title Patient Comfort During Postop Period in Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Opioid and Opioid-Free Anesthesia
title_full Patient Comfort During Postop Period in Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Opioid and Opioid-Free Anesthesia
title_fullStr Patient Comfort During Postop Period in Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Opioid and Opioid-Free Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Patient Comfort During Postop Period in Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Opioid and Opioid-Free Anesthesia
title_short Patient Comfort During Postop Period in Breast Cancer Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Opioid and Opioid-Free Anesthesia
title_sort patient comfort during postop period in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial comparing opioid and opioid-free anesthesia
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819361
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33871
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnasamyyuvarajaravindhan patientcomfortduringpostopperiodinbreastcancersurgeriesarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingopioidandopioidfreeanesthesia
AT gayathribalasubramaniam patientcomfortduringpostopperiodinbreastcancersurgeriesarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingopioidandopioidfreeanesthesia
AT balasubramaniannatarajan patientcomfortduringpostopperiodinbreastcancersurgeriesarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingopioidandopioidfreeanesthesia
AT mirunalinigunaseelan patientcomfortduringpostopperiodinbreastcancersurgeriesarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingopioidandopioidfreeanesthesia