Cargando…
Evaluating the role of time in range as a glycemic target during short‐term intensive insulin therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
BACKGROUND: Tight glycemic control during short‐term intensive insulin therapy (SIIT) is critical for inducing diabetes remission in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D). This work aimed to investigate the role of time in range (TIR) during SIIT as a novel glycemic target by predictin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13355 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Tight glycemic control during short‐term intensive insulin therapy (SIIT) is critical for inducing diabetes remission in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D). This work aimed to investigate the role of time in range (TIR) during SIIT as a novel glycemic target by predicting clinical outcomes. METHODS: SIIT was given to 116 patients with newly diagnosed T2D, with daily eight‐point capillary glucose monitored. Glycemic targets (fasting/premeal glucose, 3.9–6.0 mmol/L; 2 h postprandial blood glucose, 3.9–7.8 mmol/L) were achieved and maintained for 2 weeks. TIR(PIR) was calculated as the percentage of glucose points within these glycemic targets during the maintenance period and was compared to TIR(3.9–7.8mmol/L) and TIR(3.9–10.0mmol/L). Acute insulin response (AIR), HOMA‐IR, HOMA‐B, and disposition index (DI) were measured. Patients were followed up for 1 year to observe clinical outcomes. RESULTS: TIR(PIR), TIR(3.9–7.8mmol/L), and TIR(3.9–10.0mmol/L) were 67.2 ± 11.2%, 80.8 ± 9.2%, and 90.1 ± 6.2%, respectively. After SIIT, β‐cell function and insulin sensitivity improved remarkably, and the 1‐year remission rate was 55.2%. △AIR and △DI were positively correlated with all the TIR values, whereas only TIR(PIR) was correlated with △HOMA‐IR (r = −0.22, p = 0.03). Higher TIR(PIR) but not TIR(3.9–7.8mmol/L) or TIR(3.9–10.0mmol/L) was robustly associated with diabetes remission; patients in the lower TIR(PIR) tertile had an elevated risk of hyperglycemia relapse (hazard ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.6–7.2, p = .001). Only those with TIR(PIR) ≥ 65% had a one‐year remission rate of over 60%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings advocate TIR(PIR) ≥ 65% as a novel glycemic target during SIIT for clinical decision‐making. |
---|