Cargando…
3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience
AIMS: Three Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides critical imaging information for many conditions. Owing to potential interactions of the magnetic field, it is largely withheld from patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Therefore, we assessed the safety of 3T M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36413601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac213 |
_version_ | 1784889992928034816 |
---|---|
author | Fluschnik, Nina Tahir, Enver Erley, Jennifer Müllerleile, Kai Metzner, Andreas Wenzel, Jan-Per Guerreiro, Helena Adam, Gerhard Blankenberg, Stefan Kirchhof, Paulus Tönnis, Tobias Nikorowitsch, Julius |
author_facet | Fluschnik, Nina Tahir, Enver Erley, Jennifer Müllerleile, Kai Metzner, Andreas Wenzel, Jan-Per Guerreiro, Helena Adam, Gerhard Blankenberg, Stefan Kirchhof, Paulus Tönnis, Tobias Nikorowitsch, Julius |
author_sort | Fluschnik, Nina |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Three Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides critical imaging information for many conditions. Owing to potential interactions of the magnetic field, it is largely withheld from patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Therefore, we assessed the safety of 3T MRI in patients with ‘3T MRI-conditional’ and ‘non-3T MRI-conditional’ CIEDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective single-centre analysis of clinically indicated 3T MRI examinations in patients with conventional pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization devices, and implanted defibrillators from April 2020 to May 2022. All CIEDs were interrogated and programmed before and after scanning. Adverse events included all-cause death, arrhythmias, loss of capture, inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapies, electrical reset, and lead or generator failure during or shortly after MRI. Changes in signal amplitude and lead impedance were systematically assessed. Statistics included median and interquartile range. A total of 132 MRI examinations were performed on a 3T scanner in 97 patients. Thirty-five examinations were performed in patients with ‘non-3T MRI-conditional’ CIEDs. Twenty-six scans were performed in pacemaker-dependent patients. No adverse events occurred during or shortly after MRI. P-wave or R-wave reductions ≥ 50 and ≥ 25%, respectively, were noted after three (2.3%) scans, all in patients with ‘3T MRI-conditional’ CIEDs. Pacing and shock impedance changed by ± 30% in one case (0.7%). Battery voltage and stimulation thresholds did not relevantly change after MRI. CONCLUSION: Pending verification in independent series, our data suggest that clinically indicated MRI scans at 3T field strength should not be withheld from patients with cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9935018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99350182023-02-17 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience Fluschnik, Nina Tahir, Enver Erley, Jennifer Müllerleile, Kai Metzner, Andreas Wenzel, Jan-Per Guerreiro, Helena Adam, Gerhard Blankenberg, Stefan Kirchhof, Paulus Tönnis, Tobias Nikorowitsch, Julius Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Three Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides critical imaging information for many conditions. Owing to potential interactions of the magnetic field, it is largely withheld from patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Therefore, we assessed the safety of 3T MRI in patients with ‘3T MRI-conditional’ and ‘non-3T MRI-conditional’ CIEDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective single-centre analysis of clinically indicated 3T MRI examinations in patients with conventional pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization devices, and implanted defibrillators from April 2020 to May 2022. All CIEDs were interrogated and programmed before and after scanning. Adverse events included all-cause death, arrhythmias, loss of capture, inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapies, electrical reset, and lead or generator failure during or shortly after MRI. Changes in signal amplitude and lead impedance were systematically assessed. Statistics included median and interquartile range. A total of 132 MRI examinations were performed on a 3T scanner in 97 patients. Thirty-five examinations were performed in patients with ‘non-3T MRI-conditional’ CIEDs. Twenty-six scans were performed in pacemaker-dependent patients. No adverse events occurred during or shortly after MRI. P-wave or R-wave reductions ≥ 50 and ≥ 25%, respectively, were noted after three (2.3%) scans, all in patients with ‘3T MRI-conditional’ CIEDs. Pacing and shock impedance changed by ± 30% in one case (0.7%). Battery voltage and stimulation thresholds did not relevantly change after MRI. CONCLUSION: Pending verification in independent series, our data suggest that clinically indicated MRI scans at 3T field strength should not be withheld from patients with cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators. Oxford University Press 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9935018/ /pubmed/36413601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac213 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Fluschnik, Nina Tahir, Enver Erley, Jennifer Müllerleile, Kai Metzner, Andreas Wenzel, Jan-Per Guerreiro, Helena Adam, Gerhard Blankenberg, Stefan Kirchhof, Paulus Tönnis, Tobias Nikorowitsch, Julius 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience |
title | 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience |
title_full | 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience |
title_fullStr | 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience |
title_full_unstemmed | 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience |
title_short | 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience |
title_sort | 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36413601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fluschniknina 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT tahirenver 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT erleyjennifer 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT mullerleilekai 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT metznerandreas 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT wenzeljanper 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT guerreirohelena 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT adamgerhard 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT blankenbergstefan 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT kirchhofpaulus 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT tonnistobias 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience AT nikorowitschjulius 3teslamagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesasinglecentreexperience |