Cargando…

Retrograde urethrography in children: a decade of experience at a children’s hospital

BACKGROUND: Retrograde urethrography (RUG) is a radiologic procedure that optimizes imaging evaluation of the urethra, particularly in settings of difficulty with micturition or urethral injury. OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with RUG at a large pediatric radiology practice. MATERIALS AND METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elsingergy, Mohamed M., Bellah, Richard D., Back, Susan J., Weiss, Dana A., Darge, Kassa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36797371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05589-7
_version_ 1784890010964590592
author Elsingergy, Mohamed M.
Bellah, Richard D.
Back, Susan J.
Weiss, Dana A.
Darge, Kassa
author_facet Elsingergy, Mohamed M.
Bellah, Richard D.
Back, Susan J.
Weiss, Dana A.
Darge, Kassa
author_sort Elsingergy, Mohamed M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Retrograde urethrography (RUG) is a radiologic procedure that optimizes imaging evaluation of the urethra, particularly in settings of difficulty with micturition or urethral injury. OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with RUG at a large pediatric radiology practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records and fluoroscopic images of RUGs performed from January 2010 to December 2020. RESULTS: We identified 180 RUG exams (median frequency 17 exams per year), all in male children (median age 13 years). The most common indications were stricture (42%; n=76), postsurgical evaluation (34%; n=62) and trauma (16%; n=29). The most commonly used catheter was Foley (40%; n=72), with a median catheter size of 5 French (Fr) for infants younger than 1 year, 7 Fr for children ages 1–5 years and 8 Fr for children older than 5 years. About a third of the children (57; 32%) had combined voiding cystourethrography (VCUG)–RUG exams. Water-soluble contrast agent, either 17% or 43% Cysto-Conray, was used. Most RUG exams were normal (46%; n=83). The most common urethral pathology was stricture (30%; n=54), commonly involving a bulbar urethra (n=26). Urethral trauma was seen in 11 children (6%), 10 bulbar and 1 membranous. Most children with stricture were surgically treated (n=40; 74%), whereas most children with trauma were conservatively treated (n=8; 73%). The remaining diagnoses included diverticula, polyps, valves, fistulas and duplications, constituting <17% of our sample; most of these were surgically treated. Four exams (2%) were non-diagnostic. RUG showed 89% sensitivity and 97% specificity compared to cystourethroscopy/VCUG findings. Technical difficulties occurred in 14 (8%) children (e.g., pain or inappropriate catheter seal). CONCLUSION: Our experience indicates that when catheterization techniques are properly tailored, RUG provides a useful and successful radiologic method of evaluating the pediatric male urethra. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00247-023-05589-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9935245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99352452023-02-17 Retrograde urethrography in children: a decade of experience at a children’s hospital Elsingergy, Mohamed M. Bellah, Richard D. Back, Susan J. Weiss, Dana A. Darge, Kassa Pediatr Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Retrograde urethrography (RUG) is a radiologic procedure that optimizes imaging evaluation of the urethra, particularly in settings of difficulty with micturition or urethral injury. OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with RUG at a large pediatric radiology practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records and fluoroscopic images of RUGs performed from January 2010 to December 2020. RESULTS: We identified 180 RUG exams (median frequency 17 exams per year), all in male children (median age 13 years). The most common indications were stricture (42%; n=76), postsurgical evaluation (34%; n=62) and trauma (16%; n=29). The most commonly used catheter was Foley (40%; n=72), with a median catheter size of 5 French (Fr) for infants younger than 1 year, 7 Fr for children ages 1–5 years and 8 Fr for children older than 5 years. About a third of the children (57; 32%) had combined voiding cystourethrography (VCUG)–RUG exams. Water-soluble contrast agent, either 17% or 43% Cysto-Conray, was used. Most RUG exams were normal (46%; n=83). The most common urethral pathology was stricture (30%; n=54), commonly involving a bulbar urethra (n=26). Urethral trauma was seen in 11 children (6%), 10 bulbar and 1 membranous. Most children with stricture were surgically treated (n=40; 74%), whereas most children with trauma were conservatively treated (n=8; 73%). The remaining diagnoses included diverticula, polyps, valves, fistulas and duplications, constituting <17% of our sample; most of these were surgically treated. Four exams (2%) were non-diagnostic. RUG showed 89% sensitivity and 97% specificity compared to cystourethroscopy/VCUG findings. Technical difficulties occurred in 14 (8%) children (e.g., pain or inappropriate catheter seal). CONCLUSION: Our experience indicates that when catheterization techniques are properly tailored, RUG provides a useful and successful radiologic method of evaluating the pediatric male urethra. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00247-023-05589-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9935245/ /pubmed/36797371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05589-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Elsingergy, Mohamed M.
Bellah, Richard D.
Back, Susan J.
Weiss, Dana A.
Darge, Kassa
Retrograde urethrography in children: a decade of experience at a children’s hospital
title Retrograde urethrography in children: a decade of experience at a children’s hospital
title_full Retrograde urethrography in children: a decade of experience at a children’s hospital
title_fullStr Retrograde urethrography in children: a decade of experience at a children’s hospital
title_full_unstemmed Retrograde urethrography in children: a decade of experience at a children’s hospital
title_short Retrograde urethrography in children: a decade of experience at a children’s hospital
title_sort retrograde urethrography in children: a decade of experience at a children’s hospital
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36797371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05589-7
work_keys_str_mv AT elsingergymohamedm retrogradeurethrographyinchildrenadecadeofexperienceatachildrenshospital
AT bellahrichardd retrogradeurethrographyinchildrenadecadeofexperienceatachildrenshospital
AT backsusanj retrogradeurethrographyinchildrenadecadeofexperienceatachildrenshospital
AT weissdanaa retrogradeurethrographyinchildrenadecadeofexperienceatachildrenshospital
AT dargekassa retrogradeurethrographyinchildrenadecadeofexperienceatachildrenshospital