Cargando…

Comparison of paravertebral block vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia is used in the majority of patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. To reduce the general anesthesia-related risks and complications, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the paravertebral block as a novel and alternative anesthetic method for percu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fei, Miaomiao, Qin, Wendong, An, Guanghui, Li, Dujian, Li, Cheng, Xiong, Lize
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817763
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1081530
_version_ 1784890051431235584
author Fei, Miaomiao
Qin, Wendong
An, Guanghui
Li, Dujian
Li, Cheng
Xiong, Lize
author_facet Fei, Miaomiao
Qin, Wendong
An, Guanghui
Li, Dujian
Li, Cheng
Xiong, Lize
author_sort Fei, Miaomiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: General anesthesia is used in the majority of patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. To reduce the general anesthesia-related risks and complications, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the paravertebral block as a novel and alternative anesthetic method for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A total of 198 patients under percutaneous nephrolithotomy were included. Among them, 76 patients received paravertebral block and 122 received general anesthesia. Patients’ characteristics, surgical outcomes, anesthetic outcomes, and perioperative complications and the visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paravertebral block compared with general anesthesia. Intergroup differences of the parameters were analyzed using an independent t-test and χ(2)-tests appropriate. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients who underwent paravertebral block completed the surgery successfully, three patients were supplemented with propofol for discomfort during ureteroscopy, and two patients were supplemented with remifentanil for incomplete nerve blockade. Patients who underwent paravertebral block had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and heart function grade, including patients with contraindications to general anesthesia. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events and the anesthesia costs were less in patients who underwent paravertebral block. VAS pain scores during the postoperative period in patients who underwent paravertebral block were lower than those in patients who underwent general anesthesia without the use of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, paravertebral block was found to be effective and safe in providing intraoperative anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and had less adverse events and anesthesia costs. Paravertebral block is an attractive alternative anesthesia for patients at increased risk of comorbidities following general or neuraxial anesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9935603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99356032023-02-18 Comparison of paravertebral block vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective study Fei, Miaomiao Qin, Wendong An, Guanghui Li, Dujian Li, Cheng Xiong, Lize Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: General anesthesia is used in the majority of patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. To reduce the general anesthesia-related risks and complications, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the paravertebral block as a novel and alternative anesthetic method for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A total of 198 patients under percutaneous nephrolithotomy were included. Among them, 76 patients received paravertebral block and 122 received general anesthesia. Patients’ characteristics, surgical outcomes, anesthetic outcomes, and perioperative complications and the visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paravertebral block compared with general anesthesia. Intergroup differences of the parameters were analyzed using an independent t-test and χ(2)-tests appropriate. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients who underwent paravertebral block completed the surgery successfully, three patients were supplemented with propofol for discomfort during ureteroscopy, and two patients were supplemented with remifentanil for incomplete nerve blockade. Patients who underwent paravertebral block had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and heart function grade, including patients with contraindications to general anesthesia. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events and the anesthesia costs were less in patients who underwent paravertebral block. VAS pain scores during the postoperative period in patients who underwent paravertebral block were lower than those in patients who underwent general anesthesia without the use of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, paravertebral block was found to be effective and safe in providing intraoperative anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and had less adverse events and anesthesia costs. Paravertebral block is an attractive alternative anesthesia for patients at increased risk of comorbidities following general or neuraxial anesthesia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9935603/ /pubmed/36817763 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1081530 Text en Copyright © 2023 Fei, Qin, An, Li, Li and Xiong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Fei, Miaomiao
Qin, Wendong
An, Guanghui
Li, Dujian
Li, Cheng
Xiong, Lize
Comparison of paravertebral block vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective study
title Comparison of paravertebral block vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective study
title_full Comparison of paravertebral block vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of paravertebral block vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of paravertebral block vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective study
title_short Comparison of paravertebral block vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective study
title_sort comparison of paravertebral block vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36817763
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1081530
work_keys_str_mv AT feimiaomiao comparisonofparavertebralblockvsgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaretrospectivestudy
AT qinwendong comparisonofparavertebralblockvsgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaretrospectivestudy
AT anguanghui comparisonofparavertebralblockvsgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaretrospectivestudy
AT lidujian comparisonofparavertebralblockvsgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaretrospectivestudy
AT licheng comparisonofparavertebralblockvsgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaretrospectivestudy
AT xionglize comparisonofparavertebralblockvsgeneralanesthesiaforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyaretrospectivestudy