Cargando…
SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography
OBJECTIVE: To develop a two-phased deep learning sorting algorithm for post-X-ray image acquisition in order to facilitate large musculoskeletal image datasets according to their anatomical entity. METHODS: In total, 42,608 unstructured and pseudonymized radiographs were retrieved from the PACS of a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09184-6 |
_version_ | 1784890070446112768 |
---|---|
author | Hinterwimmer, Florian Consalvo, Sarah Wilhelm, Nikolas Seidl, Fritz Burgkart, Rainer H. H. von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Rueckert, Daniel Neumann, Jan |
author_facet | Hinterwimmer, Florian Consalvo, Sarah Wilhelm, Nikolas Seidl, Fritz Burgkart, Rainer H. H. von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Rueckert, Daniel Neumann, Jan |
author_sort | Hinterwimmer, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop a two-phased deep learning sorting algorithm for post-X-ray image acquisition in order to facilitate large musculoskeletal image datasets according to their anatomical entity. METHODS: In total, 42,608 unstructured and pseudonymized radiographs were retrieved from the PACS of a musculoskeletal tumor center. In phase 1, imaging data were sorted into 1000 clusters by a self-supervised model. A human-in-the-loop radiologist assigned weak, semantic labels to all clusters and clusters with the same label were merged. Three hundred thirty-two non-musculoskeletal clusters were discarded. In phase 2, the initial model was modified by “injecting” the identified labels into the self-supervised model to train a classifier. To provide statistical significance, data split and cross-validation were applied. The hold-out test set consisted of 50% external data. To gain insight into the model’s predictions, Grad-CAMs were calculated. RESULTS: The self-supervised clustering resulted in a high normalized mutual information of 0.930. The expert radiologist identified 28 musculoskeletal clusters. The modified model achieved a classification accuracy of 96.2% and 96.6% for validation and hold-out test data for predicting the top class, respectively. When considering the top two predicted class labels, an accuracy of 99.7% and 99.6% was accomplished. Grad-CAMs as well as final cluster results underlined the robustness of the proposed method by showing that it focused on similar image regions a human would have considered for categorizing images. CONCLUSION: For efficient dataset building, we propose an accurate deep learning sorting algorithm for classifying radiographs according to their anatomical entity in the assessment of musculoskeletal diseases. KEY POINTS: • Classification of large radiograph datasets according to their anatomical entity. • Paramount importance of structuring vast amounts of retrospective data for modern deep learning applications. • Optimization of the radiological workflow and increase in efficiency as well as decrease of time-consuming tasks for radiologists through deep learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9935683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99356832023-02-18 SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography Hinterwimmer, Florian Consalvo, Sarah Wilhelm, Nikolas Seidl, Fritz Burgkart, Rainer H. H. von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Rueckert, Daniel Neumann, Jan Eur Radiol Musculoskeletal OBJECTIVE: To develop a two-phased deep learning sorting algorithm for post-X-ray image acquisition in order to facilitate large musculoskeletal image datasets according to their anatomical entity. METHODS: In total, 42,608 unstructured and pseudonymized radiographs were retrieved from the PACS of a musculoskeletal tumor center. In phase 1, imaging data were sorted into 1000 clusters by a self-supervised model. A human-in-the-loop radiologist assigned weak, semantic labels to all clusters and clusters with the same label were merged. Three hundred thirty-two non-musculoskeletal clusters were discarded. In phase 2, the initial model was modified by “injecting” the identified labels into the self-supervised model to train a classifier. To provide statistical significance, data split and cross-validation were applied. The hold-out test set consisted of 50% external data. To gain insight into the model’s predictions, Grad-CAMs were calculated. RESULTS: The self-supervised clustering resulted in a high normalized mutual information of 0.930. The expert radiologist identified 28 musculoskeletal clusters. The modified model achieved a classification accuracy of 96.2% and 96.6% for validation and hold-out test data for predicting the top class, respectively. When considering the top two predicted class labels, an accuracy of 99.7% and 99.6% was accomplished. Grad-CAMs as well as final cluster results underlined the robustness of the proposed method by showing that it focused on similar image regions a human would have considered for categorizing images. CONCLUSION: For efficient dataset building, we propose an accurate deep learning sorting algorithm for classifying radiographs according to their anatomical entity in the assessment of musculoskeletal diseases. KEY POINTS: • Classification of large radiograph datasets according to their anatomical entity. • Paramount importance of structuring vast amounts of retrospective data for modern deep learning applications. • Optimization of the radiological workflow and increase in efficiency as well as decrease of time-consuming tasks for radiologists through deep learning. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9935683/ /pubmed/36307553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09184-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Musculoskeletal Hinterwimmer, Florian Consalvo, Sarah Wilhelm, Nikolas Seidl, Fritz Burgkart, Rainer H. H. von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Rueckert, Daniel Neumann, Jan SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography |
title | SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography |
title_full | SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography |
title_fullStr | SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography |
title_full_unstemmed | SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography |
title_short | SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography |
title_sort | sam-x: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography |
topic | Musculoskeletal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09184-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hinterwimmerflorian samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography AT consalvosarah samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography AT wilhelmnikolas samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography AT seidlfritz samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography AT burgkartrainerhh samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography AT voneisenhartrotherudiger samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography AT rueckertdaniel samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography AT neumannjan samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography |