Cargando…

SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography

OBJECTIVE: To develop a two-phased deep learning sorting algorithm for post-X-ray image acquisition in order to facilitate large musculoskeletal image datasets according to their anatomical entity. METHODS: In total, 42,608 unstructured and pseudonymized radiographs were retrieved from the PACS of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hinterwimmer, Florian, Consalvo, Sarah, Wilhelm, Nikolas, Seidl, Fritz, Burgkart, Rainer H. H., von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger, Rueckert, Daniel, Neumann, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09184-6
_version_ 1784890070446112768
author Hinterwimmer, Florian
Consalvo, Sarah
Wilhelm, Nikolas
Seidl, Fritz
Burgkart, Rainer H. H.
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger
Rueckert, Daniel
Neumann, Jan
author_facet Hinterwimmer, Florian
Consalvo, Sarah
Wilhelm, Nikolas
Seidl, Fritz
Burgkart, Rainer H. H.
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger
Rueckert, Daniel
Neumann, Jan
author_sort Hinterwimmer, Florian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a two-phased deep learning sorting algorithm for post-X-ray image acquisition in order to facilitate large musculoskeletal image datasets according to their anatomical entity. METHODS: In total, 42,608 unstructured and pseudonymized radiographs were retrieved from the PACS of a musculoskeletal tumor center. In phase 1, imaging data were sorted into 1000 clusters by a self-supervised model. A human-in-the-loop radiologist assigned weak, semantic labels to all clusters and clusters with the same label were merged. Three hundred thirty-two non-musculoskeletal clusters were discarded. In phase 2, the initial model was modified by “injecting” the identified labels into the self-supervised model to train a classifier. To provide statistical significance, data split and cross-validation were applied. The hold-out test set consisted of 50% external data. To gain insight into the model’s predictions, Grad-CAMs were calculated. RESULTS: The self-supervised clustering resulted in a high normalized mutual information of 0.930. The expert radiologist identified 28 musculoskeletal clusters. The modified model achieved a classification accuracy of 96.2% and 96.6% for validation and hold-out test data for predicting the top class, respectively. When considering the top two predicted class labels, an accuracy of 99.7% and 99.6% was accomplished. Grad-CAMs as well as final cluster results underlined the robustness of the proposed method by showing that it focused on similar image regions a human would have considered for categorizing images. CONCLUSION: For efficient dataset building, we propose an accurate deep learning sorting algorithm for classifying radiographs according to their anatomical entity in the assessment of musculoskeletal diseases. KEY POINTS: • Classification of large radiograph datasets according to their anatomical entity. • Paramount importance of structuring vast amounts of retrospective data for modern deep learning applications. • Optimization of the radiological workflow and increase in efficiency as well as decrease of time-consuming tasks for radiologists through deep learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9935683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99356832023-02-18 SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography Hinterwimmer, Florian Consalvo, Sarah Wilhelm, Nikolas Seidl, Fritz Burgkart, Rainer H. H. von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger Rueckert, Daniel Neumann, Jan Eur Radiol Musculoskeletal OBJECTIVE: To develop a two-phased deep learning sorting algorithm for post-X-ray image acquisition in order to facilitate large musculoskeletal image datasets according to their anatomical entity. METHODS: In total, 42,608 unstructured and pseudonymized radiographs were retrieved from the PACS of a musculoskeletal tumor center. In phase 1, imaging data were sorted into 1000 clusters by a self-supervised model. A human-in-the-loop radiologist assigned weak, semantic labels to all clusters and clusters with the same label were merged. Three hundred thirty-two non-musculoskeletal clusters were discarded. In phase 2, the initial model was modified by “injecting” the identified labels into the self-supervised model to train a classifier. To provide statistical significance, data split and cross-validation were applied. The hold-out test set consisted of 50% external data. To gain insight into the model’s predictions, Grad-CAMs were calculated. RESULTS: The self-supervised clustering resulted in a high normalized mutual information of 0.930. The expert radiologist identified 28 musculoskeletal clusters. The modified model achieved a classification accuracy of 96.2% and 96.6% for validation and hold-out test data for predicting the top class, respectively. When considering the top two predicted class labels, an accuracy of 99.7% and 99.6% was accomplished. Grad-CAMs as well as final cluster results underlined the robustness of the proposed method by showing that it focused on similar image regions a human would have considered for categorizing images. CONCLUSION: For efficient dataset building, we propose an accurate deep learning sorting algorithm for classifying radiographs according to their anatomical entity in the assessment of musculoskeletal diseases. KEY POINTS: • Classification of large radiograph datasets according to their anatomical entity. • Paramount importance of structuring vast amounts of retrospective data for modern deep learning applications. • Optimization of the radiological workflow and increase in efficiency as well as decrease of time-consuming tasks for radiologists through deep learning. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9935683/ /pubmed/36307553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09184-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal
Hinterwimmer, Florian
Consalvo, Sarah
Wilhelm, Nikolas
Seidl, Fritz
Burgkart, Rainer H. H.
von Eisenhart-Rothe, Rüdiger
Rueckert, Daniel
Neumann, Jan
SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography
title SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography
title_full SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography
title_fullStr SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography
title_full_unstemmed SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography
title_short SAM-X: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography
title_sort sam-x: sorting algorithm for musculoskeletal x-ray radiography
topic Musculoskeletal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09184-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hinterwimmerflorian samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography
AT consalvosarah samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography
AT wilhelmnikolas samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography
AT seidlfritz samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography
AT burgkartrainerhh samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography
AT voneisenhartrotherudiger samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography
AT rueckertdaniel samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography
AT neumannjan samxsortingalgorithmformusculoskeletalxrayradiography