Cargando…

Contrast media timing optimization for coronary CT angiography: a retrospective validation study in swine

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to retrospectively develop a protocol in swine for optimal contrast media timing in coronary CT angiography (CCTA). METHODS: Several dynamic acquisitions were performed in 28 swine (55 ± 24 kg) with cardiac outputs between 1.5 and 5.5 L/min, for 80 total acquisitions. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hubbard, Logan, Malkasian, Shant, Zhao, Yixiao, Abbona, Pablo, Molloi, Sabee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36219236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09161-z
_version_ 1784890074858520576
author Hubbard, Logan
Malkasian, Shant
Zhao, Yixiao
Abbona, Pablo
Molloi, Sabee
author_facet Hubbard, Logan
Malkasian, Shant
Zhao, Yixiao
Abbona, Pablo
Molloi, Sabee
author_sort Hubbard, Logan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective was to retrospectively develop a protocol in swine for optimal contrast media timing in coronary CT angiography (CCTA). METHODS: Several dynamic acquisitions were performed in 28 swine (55 ± 24 kg) with cardiac outputs between 1.5 and 5.5 L/min, for 80 total acquisitions. The contrast was injected (1mL/kg, 5mL/s, Isovue 370), followed by dynamic scanning of the entire aortic enhancement curve, from which the true peak time and aortic and coronary enhancements were recorded as the reference standard. Each dataset was then used to simulate two different CCTA protocols—a new optimal protocol and a standard clinical protocol. For the optimal protocol, the CCTA was acquired after bolus tracking-based trigging using a variable time delay of one-half the contrast injection time interval plus 1.5 s. For the standard protocol, the CCTA was acquired after bolus tracking-based triggering using a fixed time delay of 5 s. For both protocols, the CCTA time, aortic enhancement, coronary enhancement, and coronary contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantitatively compared to the reference standard measurements. RESULTS: For the optimal protocol, the angiogram was acquired within −0.15 ± 0.75 s of the true peak time, for a mean coronary CNR within 7% of the peak coronary CNR. Conversely, for the standard CCTA protocol, the angiogram was acquired within −1.82 ± 1.71 s of the true peak time, for a mean coronary CNR that was 23% lower than the peak coronary CNR. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal CCTA protocol improves contrast media timing and coronary CNR by acquiring the angiogram at the true aortic root peak time. KEY POINTS: • This study in swine retrospectively developed the mathematical basis of an improved approach for optimal contrast media timing in CCTA. • By combining dynamic bolus tracking with a simple contrast injection timing relation, CCTA can be acquired at the peak of the aortic root enhancement. • CCTA acquisition at the peak of the aortic root enhancement should maximize the coronary enhancement and CNR, potentially improving the accuracy of CT-based assessment of coronary artery disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09161-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9935703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99357032023-02-18 Contrast media timing optimization for coronary CT angiography: a retrospective validation study in swine Hubbard, Logan Malkasian, Shant Zhao, Yixiao Abbona, Pablo Molloi, Sabee Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVES: The objective was to retrospectively develop a protocol in swine for optimal contrast media timing in coronary CT angiography (CCTA). METHODS: Several dynamic acquisitions were performed in 28 swine (55 ± 24 kg) with cardiac outputs between 1.5 and 5.5 L/min, for 80 total acquisitions. The contrast was injected (1mL/kg, 5mL/s, Isovue 370), followed by dynamic scanning of the entire aortic enhancement curve, from which the true peak time and aortic and coronary enhancements were recorded as the reference standard. Each dataset was then used to simulate two different CCTA protocols—a new optimal protocol and a standard clinical protocol. For the optimal protocol, the CCTA was acquired after bolus tracking-based trigging using a variable time delay of one-half the contrast injection time interval plus 1.5 s. For the standard protocol, the CCTA was acquired after bolus tracking-based triggering using a fixed time delay of 5 s. For both protocols, the CCTA time, aortic enhancement, coronary enhancement, and coronary contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantitatively compared to the reference standard measurements. RESULTS: For the optimal protocol, the angiogram was acquired within −0.15 ± 0.75 s of the true peak time, for a mean coronary CNR within 7% of the peak coronary CNR. Conversely, for the standard CCTA protocol, the angiogram was acquired within −1.82 ± 1.71 s of the true peak time, for a mean coronary CNR that was 23% lower than the peak coronary CNR. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal CCTA protocol improves contrast media timing and coronary CNR by acquiring the angiogram at the true aortic root peak time. KEY POINTS: • This study in swine retrospectively developed the mathematical basis of an improved approach for optimal contrast media timing in CCTA. • By combining dynamic bolus tracking with a simple contrast injection timing relation, CCTA can be acquired at the peak of the aortic root enhancement. • CCTA acquisition at the peak of the aortic root enhancement should maximize the coronary enhancement and CNR, potentially improving the accuracy of CT-based assessment of coronary artery disease. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-09161-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9935703/ /pubmed/36219236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09161-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Computed Tomography
Hubbard, Logan
Malkasian, Shant
Zhao, Yixiao
Abbona, Pablo
Molloi, Sabee
Contrast media timing optimization for coronary CT angiography: a retrospective validation study in swine
title Contrast media timing optimization for coronary CT angiography: a retrospective validation study in swine
title_full Contrast media timing optimization for coronary CT angiography: a retrospective validation study in swine
title_fullStr Contrast media timing optimization for coronary CT angiography: a retrospective validation study in swine
title_full_unstemmed Contrast media timing optimization for coronary CT angiography: a retrospective validation study in swine
title_short Contrast media timing optimization for coronary CT angiography: a retrospective validation study in swine
title_sort contrast media timing optimization for coronary ct angiography: a retrospective validation study in swine
topic Computed Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36219236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09161-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hubbardlogan contrastmediatimingoptimizationforcoronaryctangiographyaretrospectivevalidationstudyinswine
AT malkasianshant contrastmediatimingoptimizationforcoronaryctangiographyaretrospectivevalidationstudyinswine
AT zhaoyixiao contrastmediatimingoptimizationforcoronaryctangiographyaretrospectivevalidationstudyinswine
AT abbonapablo contrastmediatimingoptimizationforcoronaryctangiographyaretrospectivevalidationstudyinswine
AT molloisabee contrastmediatimingoptimizationforcoronaryctangiographyaretrospectivevalidationstudyinswine