Cargando…

Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This systematic review with meta-analysis investigated the influence of resistance training proximity-to-failure on muscle hypertrophy. METHODS: Literature searches in the PubMed, SCOPUS and SPORTDiscus databases identified a total of 15 studies that measured muscle hypertr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Refalo, Martin C., Helms, Eric R., Trexler, Eric. T., Hamilton, D. Lee, Fyfe, Jackson J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01784-y
_version_ 1784890084874518528
author Refalo, Martin C.
Helms, Eric R.
Trexler, Eric. T.
Hamilton, D. Lee
Fyfe, Jackson J.
author_facet Refalo, Martin C.
Helms, Eric R.
Trexler, Eric. T.
Hamilton, D. Lee
Fyfe, Jackson J.
author_sort Refalo, Martin C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This systematic review with meta-analysis investigated the influence of resistance training proximity-to-failure on muscle hypertrophy. METHODS: Literature searches in the PubMed, SCOPUS and SPORTDiscus databases identified a total of 15 studies that measured muscle hypertrophy (in healthy adults of any age and resistance training experience) and compared resistance training performed to: (A) momentary muscular failure versus non-failure; (B) set failure (defined as anything other than momentary muscular failure) versus non-failure; or (C) different velocity loss thresholds. RESULTS: There was a trivial advantage for resistance training performed to set failure versus non-failure for muscle hypertrophy in studies applying any definition of set failure [effect size=0.19 (95% confidence interval 0.00, 0.37), p=0.045], with no moderating effect of volume load (p=0.884) or relative load (p=0.525). Given the variability in set failure definitions applied across studies, sub-group analyses were conducted and found no advantage for either resistance training performed to momentary muscular failure versus non-failure for muscle hypertrophy [effect size=0.12 (95% confidence interval −0.13, 0.37), p=0.343], or for resistance training performed to high (>25%) versus moderate (20–25%) velocity loss thresholds [effect size=0.08 (95% confidence interval −0.16, 0.32), p=0.529]. CONCLUSION: Overall, our main findings suggest that (i) there is no evidence to support that resistance training performed to momentary muscular failure is superior to non-failure resistance training for muscle hypertrophy and (ii) higher velocity loss thresholds, and theoretically closer proximities-to-failure do not always elicit greater muscle hypertrophy. As such, these results provide evidence for a potential non-linear relationship between proximity-to-failure and muscle hypertrophy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-022-01784-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9935748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99357482023-02-18 Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis Refalo, Martin C. Helms, Eric R. Trexler, Eric. T. Hamilton, D. Lee Fyfe, Jackson J. Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This systematic review with meta-analysis investigated the influence of resistance training proximity-to-failure on muscle hypertrophy. METHODS: Literature searches in the PubMed, SCOPUS and SPORTDiscus databases identified a total of 15 studies that measured muscle hypertrophy (in healthy adults of any age and resistance training experience) and compared resistance training performed to: (A) momentary muscular failure versus non-failure; (B) set failure (defined as anything other than momentary muscular failure) versus non-failure; or (C) different velocity loss thresholds. RESULTS: There was a trivial advantage for resistance training performed to set failure versus non-failure for muscle hypertrophy in studies applying any definition of set failure [effect size=0.19 (95% confidence interval 0.00, 0.37), p=0.045], with no moderating effect of volume load (p=0.884) or relative load (p=0.525). Given the variability in set failure definitions applied across studies, sub-group analyses were conducted and found no advantage for either resistance training performed to momentary muscular failure versus non-failure for muscle hypertrophy [effect size=0.12 (95% confidence interval −0.13, 0.37), p=0.343], or for resistance training performed to high (>25%) versus moderate (20–25%) velocity loss thresholds [effect size=0.08 (95% confidence interval −0.16, 0.32), p=0.529]. CONCLUSION: Overall, our main findings suggest that (i) there is no evidence to support that resistance training performed to momentary muscular failure is superior to non-failure resistance training for muscle hypertrophy and (ii) higher velocity loss thresholds, and theoretically closer proximities-to-failure do not always elicit greater muscle hypertrophy. As such, these results provide evidence for a potential non-linear relationship between proximity-to-failure and muscle hypertrophy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-022-01784-y. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9935748/ /pubmed/36334240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01784-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Refalo, Martin C.
Helms, Eric R.
Trexler, Eric. T.
Hamilton, D. Lee
Fyfe, Jackson J.
Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
title Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
title_full Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
title_short Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
title_sort influence of resistance training proximity-to-failure on skeletal muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01784-y
work_keys_str_mv AT refalomartinc influenceofresistancetrainingproximitytofailureonskeletalmusclehypertrophyasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT helmsericr influenceofresistancetrainingproximitytofailureonskeletalmusclehypertrophyasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT trexlererict influenceofresistancetrainingproximitytofailureonskeletalmusclehypertrophyasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT hamiltondlee influenceofresistancetrainingproximitytofailureonskeletalmusclehypertrophyasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT fyfejacksonj influenceofresistancetrainingproximitytofailureonskeletalmusclehypertrophyasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis