Cargando…

Comparison of one-stage treatment versus two-stage treatment for the management of patients with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Cholelithiasis is a frequently occurring disease in clinic. Due to changes in people's living environments, dietary habits and the aging population, cholelithiasis incidence is increasing. Currently, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the preferred treatment for gallbladder stones...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nie, Shanmao, Fu, Shangyu, Fang, Kaiyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1124955
_version_ 1784890095520710656
author Nie, Shanmao
Fu, Shangyu
Fang, Kaiyan
author_facet Nie, Shanmao
Fu, Shangyu
Fang, Kaiyan
author_sort Nie, Shanmao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cholelithiasis is a frequently occurring disease in clinic. Due to changes in people's living environments, dietary habits and the aging population, cholelithiasis incidence is increasing. Currently, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the preferred treatment for gallbladder stones, but the surgical method for patients with choledocholithiasis is controversial. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (pERCP) is performed preoperatively, followed by LC as the general treatment method. However, pERCP still has some disadvantages, such as prolonged hospital stay, increased incidence of postoperative pancreatitis, and increased duration of anesthesia. Therefore, intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (iERCP) is proposed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of one-stage treatment and two-stage treatment for the management of patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched through October 2022. The search terms include cholangiolithiasis/bile duct stones/calculi, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/ERCP, endoscopic sphincterotomy/EST, laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV), and laparoscopic cholecystectomy/LC. SELECTION CRITERIA: For the treatment of patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis in adults, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LC with iERCP vs. pERCP followed by LC were conducted. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers. We used Revman version 5.3 to analyze the collected data. The trials were grouped according to the evaluation results such as the overall mortality rate, overall morbidity rate, clearance rate of choledocholithiasis, incidence of pancreatitis, the length of hospitalization, and the length of operation. RESULTS: 9 RCTs (950 participants) were included in this meta-analyses. The overall morbidity rate in LC + iERCP group is lower than that in LC + pERCP group (RR: 0.57, 95% CI = 0.41–0.79, p = 0.0008). The clearance rate of choledocholithiasis in LC + iERCP group was almost the same as that in LC + pERCP group (RR: 1.03, 95% CI = 0.98–1.08, p = 0.28). The incidence of pancreatitis in LC + iERCP group is lower than that in LC + pERCP group (RR: 0.29, 95% CI = 0.13–0.67, p = 0.004). The length of operation of the LC + iERCP group seems to be similar to that of the LC + pERCP group (MD: 16.63 95% CI = −5.98–39.24, p = 0.15). LC + iERCP group has a shorter length of hospitalization than that in LC + pERCP group (MD: −2.68 95% CI = −3.39–−1.96, p < 0.00001). LC + iERCP group has lower postoperative second ERCP rate than that in LC + pERCP group (RR: 0.13, 95% CI = 0.03–0.57, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Our study suggest that LC + iERCP may be a better option than LC + pERCP in the management of patients with both cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. This procedure can reduce the overall incidence of postoperative complications, especially the occurrence of postoperative pancreatitis. It could shorten the length of hospital stay, reduce postoperative second ERCP rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9935819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99358192023-02-18 Comparison of one-stage treatment versus two-stage treatment for the management of patients with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis Nie, Shanmao Fu, Shangyu Fang, Kaiyan Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Cholelithiasis is a frequently occurring disease in clinic. Due to changes in people's living environments, dietary habits and the aging population, cholelithiasis incidence is increasing. Currently, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the preferred treatment for gallbladder stones, but the surgical method for patients with choledocholithiasis is controversial. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (pERCP) is performed preoperatively, followed by LC as the general treatment method. However, pERCP still has some disadvantages, such as prolonged hospital stay, increased incidence of postoperative pancreatitis, and increased duration of anesthesia. Therefore, intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (iERCP) is proposed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of one-stage treatment and two-stage treatment for the management of patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched through October 2022. The search terms include cholangiolithiasis/bile duct stones/calculi, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/ERCP, endoscopic sphincterotomy/EST, laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV), and laparoscopic cholecystectomy/LC. SELECTION CRITERIA: For the treatment of patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis in adults, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LC with iERCP vs. pERCP followed by LC were conducted. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers. We used Revman version 5.3 to analyze the collected data. The trials were grouped according to the evaluation results such as the overall mortality rate, overall morbidity rate, clearance rate of choledocholithiasis, incidence of pancreatitis, the length of hospitalization, and the length of operation. RESULTS: 9 RCTs (950 participants) were included in this meta-analyses. The overall morbidity rate in LC + iERCP group is lower than that in LC + pERCP group (RR: 0.57, 95% CI = 0.41–0.79, p = 0.0008). The clearance rate of choledocholithiasis in LC + iERCP group was almost the same as that in LC + pERCP group (RR: 1.03, 95% CI = 0.98–1.08, p = 0.28). The incidence of pancreatitis in LC + iERCP group is lower than that in LC + pERCP group (RR: 0.29, 95% CI = 0.13–0.67, p = 0.004). The length of operation of the LC + iERCP group seems to be similar to that of the LC + pERCP group (MD: 16.63 95% CI = −5.98–39.24, p = 0.15). LC + iERCP group has a shorter length of hospitalization than that in LC + pERCP group (MD: −2.68 95% CI = −3.39–−1.96, p < 0.00001). LC + iERCP group has lower postoperative second ERCP rate than that in LC + pERCP group (RR: 0.13, 95% CI = 0.03–0.57, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Our study suggest that LC + iERCP may be a better option than LC + pERCP in the management of patients with both cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. This procedure can reduce the overall incidence of postoperative complications, especially the occurrence of postoperative pancreatitis. It could shorten the length of hospital stay, reduce postoperative second ERCP rate. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9935819/ /pubmed/36816010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1124955 Text en © 2023 Nie, Fu and Fang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Nie, Shanmao
Fu, Shangyu
Fang, Kaiyan
Comparison of one-stage treatment versus two-stage treatment for the management of patients with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis
title Comparison of one-stage treatment versus two-stage treatment for the management of patients with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of one-stage treatment versus two-stage treatment for the management of patients with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of one-stage treatment versus two-stage treatment for the management of patients with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of one-stage treatment versus two-stage treatment for the management of patients with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of one-stage treatment versus two-stage treatment for the management of patients with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of one-stage treatment versus two-stage treatment for the management of patients with common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9935819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1124955
work_keys_str_mv AT nieshanmao comparisonofonestagetreatmentversustwostagetreatmentforthemanagementofpatientswithcommonbileductstonesametaanalysis
AT fushangyu comparisonofonestagetreatmentversustwostagetreatmentforthemanagementofpatientswithcommonbileductstonesametaanalysis
AT fangkaiyan comparisonofonestagetreatmentversustwostagetreatmentforthemanagementofpatientswithcommonbileductstonesametaanalysis