Cargando…
Health professionals’ routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVES: Documenting routine practice is significant for better diagnosis, treatment, continuity of care and medicolegal issues. However, health professionals’ routine practice documentation is poorly practised. Therefore, this study aimed to assess health professionals’ routine practice document...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36796855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100699 |
_version_ | 1784890203137114112 |
---|---|
author | Demsash, Addisalem Workie Kassie, Sisay Yitayih Dubale, Abiy Tasew Chereka, Alex Ayenew Ngusie, Habtamu Setegn Hunde, Mekonnen Kenate Emanu, Milkias Dugassa Shibabaw, Adamu Ambachew Walle, Agmasie Damtew |
author_facet | Demsash, Addisalem Workie Kassie, Sisay Yitayih Dubale, Abiy Tasew Chereka, Alex Ayenew Ngusie, Habtamu Setegn Hunde, Mekonnen Kenate Emanu, Milkias Dugassa Shibabaw, Adamu Ambachew Walle, Agmasie Damtew |
author_sort | Demsash, Addisalem Workie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Documenting routine practice is significant for better diagnosis, treatment, continuity of care and medicolegal issues. However, health professionals’ routine practice documentation is poorly practised. Therefore, this study aimed to assess health professionals’ routine practice documentation and associated factors in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: An institution-based cross-sectional study design was used from 24 March up to 19 April 2022. Stratified random sampling and a pretested self-administered questionnaire were used among 423 samples. Epi Info V.7.1 and STATA V.15 software were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. Descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model were employed to describe the study subjects and to measure the strength of association between dependent and independent variables, respectively. A variable with a p value of <0.2 in bivariate logistic regression was considered for multivariable logistic regression. In multivariable logistic regression, ORs with 95% CIs and a p value of <0.05 were considered to determine the strength of association between dependent and independent variables. RESULTS: Health professionals’ documentation practice was 51.1% (95% CI: 48.64 to 53.1). Lack of motivation (adjusted OR (AOR): 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.76), good knowledge (AOR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.72 to 2.97), taking training (AOR: 4.18, 95% CI: 2.99 to 8.28), using electronic systems (AOR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.36 to 3.28), availability of standard documentation tools (AOR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.35 to 4.43) were statistically associated factors. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals’ documentation practice is good. Lack of motivation, good knowledge, taking training, using electronic systems and the availability of documentation tools were significant factors. Stakeholders should provide additional training, and encourage professionals to use an electronic system for documentation practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9936289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99362892023-02-18 Health professionals’ routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study Demsash, Addisalem Workie Kassie, Sisay Yitayih Dubale, Abiy Tasew Chereka, Alex Ayenew Ngusie, Habtamu Setegn Hunde, Mekonnen Kenate Emanu, Milkias Dugassa Shibabaw, Adamu Ambachew Walle, Agmasie Damtew BMJ Health Care Inform Original Research OBJECTIVES: Documenting routine practice is significant for better diagnosis, treatment, continuity of care and medicolegal issues. However, health professionals’ routine practice documentation is poorly practised. Therefore, this study aimed to assess health professionals’ routine practice documentation and associated factors in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: An institution-based cross-sectional study design was used from 24 March up to 19 April 2022. Stratified random sampling and a pretested self-administered questionnaire were used among 423 samples. Epi Info V.7.1 and STATA V.15 software were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. Descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model were employed to describe the study subjects and to measure the strength of association between dependent and independent variables, respectively. A variable with a p value of <0.2 in bivariate logistic regression was considered for multivariable logistic regression. In multivariable logistic regression, ORs with 95% CIs and a p value of <0.05 were considered to determine the strength of association between dependent and independent variables. RESULTS: Health professionals’ documentation practice was 51.1% (95% CI: 48.64 to 53.1). Lack of motivation (adjusted OR (AOR): 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.76), good knowledge (AOR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.72 to 2.97), taking training (AOR: 4.18, 95% CI: 2.99 to 8.28), using electronic systems (AOR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.36 to 3.28), availability of standard documentation tools (AOR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.35 to 4.43) were statistically associated factors. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals’ documentation practice is good. Lack of motivation, good knowledge, taking training, using electronic systems and the availability of documentation tools were significant factors. Stakeholders should provide additional training, and encourage professionals to use an electronic system for documentation practices. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9936289/ /pubmed/36796855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100699 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Demsash, Addisalem Workie Kassie, Sisay Yitayih Dubale, Abiy Tasew Chereka, Alex Ayenew Ngusie, Habtamu Setegn Hunde, Mekonnen Kenate Emanu, Milkias Dugassa Shibabaw, Adamu Ambachew Walle, Agmasie Damtew Health professionals’ routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study |
title | Health professionals’ routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Health professionals’ routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Health professionals’ routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Health professionals’ routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Health professionals’ routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | health professionals’ routine practice documentation and its associated factors in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36796855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demsashaddisalemworkie healthprofessionalsroutinepracticedocumentationanditsassociatedfactorsinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT kassiesisayyitayih healthprofessionalsroutinepracticedocumentationanditsassociatedfactorsinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT dubaleabiytasew healthprofessionalsroutinepracticedocumentationanditsassociatedfactorsinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT cherekaalexayenew healthprofessionalsroutinepracticedocumentationanditsassociatedfactorsinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT ngusiehabtamusetegn healthprofessionalsroutinepracticedocumentationanditsassociatedfactorsinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT hundemekonnenkenate healthprofessionalsroutinepracticedocumentationanditsassociatedfactorsinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT emanumilkiasdugassa healthprofessionalsroutinepracticedocumentationanditsassociatedfactorsinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT shibabawadamuambachew healthprofessionalsroutinepracticedocumentationanditsassociatedfactorsinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy AT walleagmasiedamtew healthprofessionalsroutinepracticedocumentationanditsassociatedfactorsinaresourcelimitedsettingacrosssectionalstudy |