Cargando…

Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort

BACKGROUND: Digital mental health (DMH) programs can be effective in treating and preventing mental health problems. However, community engagement with these programs can be poor. Understanding the barriers and enablers of DMH program use may assist in identifying ways to increase the uptake of thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batterham, Philip, Gulliver, Amelia, Sunderland, Matthew, Farrer, Louise, Kay-Lambkin, Frances, Trias, Angelica, Calear, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36729613
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/41663
_version_ 1784890216709881856
author Batterham, Philip
Gulliver, Amelia
Sunderland, Matthew
Farrer, Louise
Kay-Lambkin, Frances
Trias, Angelica
Calear, Alison
author_facet Batterham, Philip
Gulliver, Amelia
Sunderland, Matthew
Farrer, Louise
Kay-Lambkin, Frances
Trias, Angelica
Calear, Alison
author_sort Batterham, Philip
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital mental health (DMH) programs can be effective in treating and preventing mental health problems. However, community engagement with these programs can be poor. Understanding the barriers and enablers of DMH program use may assist in identifying ways to increase the uptake of these programs, which have the potential to provide broad-scale prevention and treatment in the community. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to identify and compare factors that may influence participation in DMH programs in practice and research trials, identify any respondent characteristics that are associated with these factors, and assess the relationship between intentions to use DMH programs and actual uptake. METHODS: Australian adults aged ≥18 years were recruited from market research panels to participate in the study. The sample was representative of the Australian adult population based on age, gender, and location. Participants completed a cross-sectional web-based survey assessing demographic characteristics, mental health symptom measures, attitudes and use of DMH programs in practice and in research studies, and the factors influencing their use in both settings. RESULTS: Across both research and practice, trust in the organization delivering the service or trial was the top-ranked factor influencing participation, followed by anonymity or privacy and adequate information. There was little variation in rankings across demographic groups, including intentions to use DMH programs or mental health status. Intentions to use DMH programs were a strong predictor of both current (odds ratio 2.50, 99% CI 1.41-4.43; P<.001) and past (odds ratio 2.98, 99% CI 1.71-5.19; P<.001) use behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to increase the uptake of DMH programs or participation in research trials should focus on clearly communicating the following to users: the legitimacy of the organization delivering the program, security and use of participant data, and effectiveness of DMH programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9936370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99363702023-02-18 Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort Batterham, Philip Gulliver, Amelia Sunderland, Matthew Farrer, Louise Kay-Lambkin, Frances Trias, Angelica Calear, Alison J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Digital mental health (DMH) programs can be effective in treating and preventing mental health problems. However, community engagement with these programs can be poor. Understanding the barriers and enablers of DMH program use may assist in identifying ways to increase the uptake of these programs, which have the potential to provide broad-scale prevention and treatment in the community. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to identify and compare factors that may influence participation in DMH programs in practice and research trials, identify any respondent characteristics that are associated with these factors, and assess the relationship between intentions to use DMH programs and actual uptake. METHODS: Australian adults aged ≥18 years were recruited from market research panels to participate in the study. The sample was representative of the Australian adult population based on age, gender, and location. Participants completed a cross-sectional web-based survey assessing demographic characteristics, mental health symptom measures, attitudes and use of DMH programs in practice and in research studies, and the factors influencing their use in both settings. RESULTS: Across both research and practice, trust in the organization delivering the service or trial was the top-ranked factor influencing participation, followed by anonymity or privacy and adequate information. There was little variation in rankings across demographic groups, including intentions to use DMH programs or mental health status. Intentions to use DMH programs were a strong predictor of both current (odds ratio 2.50, 99% CI 1.41-4.43; P<.001) and past (odds ratio 2.98, 99% CI 1.71-5.19; P<.001) use behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to increase the uptake of DMH programs or participation in research trials should focus on clearly communicating the following to users: the legitimacy of the organization delivering the program, security and use of participant data, and effectiveness of DMH programs. JMIR Publications 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9936370/ /pubmed/36729613 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/41663 Text en ©Philip Batterham, Amelia Gulliver, Matthew Sunderland, Louise Farrer, Frances Kay-Lambkin, Angelica Trias, Alison Calear. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 02.02.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Batterham, Philip
Gulliver, Amelia
Sunderland, Matthew
Farrer, Louise
Kay-Lambkin, Frances
Trias, Angelica
Calear, Alison
Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort
title Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort
title_full Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort
title_fullStr Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort
title_short Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort
title_sort factors influencing community participation in internet interventions compared with research trials: observational study in a nationally representative adult cohort
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36729613
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/41663
work_keys_str_mv AT batterhamphilip factorsinfluencingcommunityparticipationininternetinterventionscomparedwithresearchtrialsobservationalstudyinanationallyrepresentativeadultcohort
AT gulliveramelia factorsinfluencingcommunityparticipationininternetinterventionscomparedwithresearchtrialsobservationalstudyinanationallyrepresentativeadultcohort
AT sunderlandmatthew factorsinfluencingcommunityparticipationininternetinterventionscomparedwithresearchtrialsobservationalstudyinanationallyrepresentativeadultcohort
AT farrerlouise factorsinfluencingcommunityparticipationininternetinterventionscomparedwithresearchtrialsobservationalstudyinanationallyrepresentativeadultcohort
AT kaylambkinfrances factorsinfluencingcommunityparticipationininternetinterventionscomparedwithresearchtrialsobservationalstudyinanationallyrepresentativeadultcohort
AT triasangelica factorsinfluencingcommunityparticipationininternetinterventionscomparedwithresearchtrialsobservationalstudyinanationallyrepresentativeadultcohort
AT calearalison factorsinfluencingcommunityparticipationininternetinterventionscomparedwithresearchtrialsobservationalstudyinanationallyrepresentativeadultcohort