Cargando…

Patient and provider perspectives to utilization of telemedicine in surgery

OBJECTIVES: Determine patient and provider perspectives on widespread rapid telemedicine implementation, understand the key components of a surgical telemedicine visit and identify factors that affect future telemedicine use. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compared to other specialties, the field of su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mark, John, Cooke, David T, Suri, Avni, Huynh, Timothy T, Yoon, Paul S, Humphries, Misty D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36818156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231152756
_version_ 1784890219696226304
author Mark, John
Cooke, David T
Suri, Avni
Huynh, Timothy T
Yoon, Paul S
Humphries, Misty D
author_facet Mark, John
Cooke, David T
Suri, Avni
Huynh, Timothy T
Yoon, Paul S
Humphries, Misty D
author_sort Mark, John
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Determine patient and provider perspectives on widespread rapid telemedicine implementation, understand the key components of a surgical telemedicine visit and identify factors that affect future telemedicine use. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compared to other specialties, the field of surgery heretofore has had limited adoption of telemedicine. During the COVID-19 pandemic Healthcare, including the surgical specialties, saw new widespread use of telemedicine. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study during the COVID-19 California stay-at-home and physical distancing executive orders. Utilization data were collected from clinics and compared to usage data during the same time 1 year later. All patients and providers who participated in a telemedicine visit during the study period were asked to complete a survey after each encounter and the surveys were analyzed for trends in opinions on future use by stakeholders. RESULTS: Over the 10-week period, the median percentage of telemedicine visits per clinic was 33% (17%–51%) which peaked 3 weeks into implementation. One hundred and ninety-one patients (48% women) with a median age of 64 years (IQR 53–73) completed the patient survey. Patients were first-time participants in telemedicine in 41% (n = 79) of visits. Fifty-seven percent (n = 45) of first-time users preferred that future visits be in-person versus 31% of prior users (p = 0.007). The median travel time from home to the clinic was 40 min (IQR = 20–90). Patients with longer travel times were not more likely to use telemedicine in the future (61% with longer travel vs. 53% shorter, p = 0.11). From the 148 provider responses, 90% of the visits providers were able to create a definitive plan with the telemedicine visit. A physical exam was determined not to be needed in 45% of the visits. An attempt at any physical exam was not performed in 84% of routine follow-up or new-patient visits, compared to 53% of post-op visits (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Telemedicine is a viable ambulatory visit option for surgical specialists and their patients. During rapid telemedicine deployment, travel distance did not correlate with increased use of telemedicine, and in-person visits are still preferred. However, nearly half of all visits did not need a physical exam, which favors telemedicine use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9936391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99363912023-02-18 Patient and provider perspectives to utilization of telemedicine in surgery Mark, John Cooke, David T Suri, Avni Huynh, Timothy T Yoon, Paul S Humphries, Misty D Digit Health Original Research OBJECTIVES: Determine patient and provider perspectives on widespread rapid telemedicine implementation, understand the key components of a surgical telemedicine visit and identify factors that affect future telemedicine use. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compared to other specialties, the field of surgery heretofore has had limited adoption of telemedicine. During the COVID-19 pandemic Healthcare, including the surgical specialties, saw new widespread use of telemedicine. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study during the COVID-19 California stay-at-home and physical distancing executive orders. Utilization data were collected from clinics and compared to usage data during the same time 1 year later. All patients and providers who participated in a telemedicine visit during the study period were asked to complete a survey after each encounter and the surveys were analyzed for trends in opinions on future use by stakeholders. RESULTS: Over the 10-week period, the median percentage of telemedicine visits per clinic was 33% (17%–51%) which peaked 3 weeks into implementation. One hundred and ninety-one patients (48% women) with a median age of 64 years (IQR 53–73) completed the patient survey. Patients were first-time participants in telemedicine in 41% (n = 79) of visits. Fifty-seven percent (n = 45) of first-time users preferred that future visits be in-person versus 31% of prior users (p = 0.007). The median travel time from home to the clinic was 40 min (IQR = 20–90). Patients with longer travel times were not more likely to use telemedicine in the future (61% with longer travel vs. 53% shorter, p = 0.11). From the 148 provider responses, 90% of the visits providers were able to create a definitive plan with the telemedicine visit. A physical exam was determined not to be needed in 45% of the visits. An attempt at any physical exam was not performed in 84% of routine follow-up or new-patient visits, compared to 53% of post-op visits (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Telemedicine is a viable ambulatory visit option for surgical specialists and their patients. During rapid telemedicine deployment, travel distance did not correlate with increased use of telemedicine, and in-person visits are still preferred. However, nearly half of all visits did not need a physical exam, which favors telemedicine use. SAGE Publications 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9936391/ /pubmed/36818156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231152756 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Mark, John
Cooke, David T
Suri, Avni
Huynh, Timothy T
Yoon, Paul S
Humphries, Misty D
Patient and provider perspectives to utilization of telemedicine in surgery
title Patient and provider perspectives to utilization of telemedicine in surgery
title_full Patient and provider perspectives to utilization of telemedicine in surgery
title_fullStr Patient and provider perspectives to utilization of telemedicine in surgery
title_full_unstemmed Patient and provider perspectives to utilization of telemedicine in surgery
title_short Patient and provider perspectives to utilization of telemedicine in surgery
title_sort patient and provider perspectives to utilization of telemedicine in surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36818156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231152756
work_keys_str_mv AT markjohn patientandproviderperspectivestoutilizationoftelemedicineinsurgery
AT cookedavidt patientandproviderperspectivestoutilizationoftelemedicineinsurgery
AT suriavni patientandproviderperspectivestoutilizationoftelemedicineinsurgery
AT huynhtimothyt patientandproviderperspectivestoutilizationoftelemedicineinsurgery
AT yoonpauls patientandproviderperspectivestoutilizationoftelemedicineinsurgery
AT humphriesmistyd patientandproviderperspectivestoutilizationoftelemedicineinsurgery