Cargando…
New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation
BACKGROUND: The traditional paper and pencil method for EDSS calculation (pEDSS) is the cornerstone of multiple sclerosis practice; however, it requires an expert for an accurate calculation, and it takes a lot of time to perform the function scores. A new algorithmic approach (aEDSS) has been devel...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552173231155055 |
_version_ | 1784890221983170560 |
---|---|
author | Fouad, Amr M Abdel Naseer, Maged Farghaly, Marwa Hegazy, Mohamed I |
author_facet | Fouad, Amr M Abdel Naseer, Maged Farghaly, Marwa Hegazy, Mohamed I |
author_sort | Fouad, Amr M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The traditional paper and pencil method for EDSS calculation (pEDSS) is the cornerstone of multiple sclerosis practice; however, it requires an expert for an accurate calculation, and it takes a lot of time to perform the function scores. A new algorithmic approach (aEDSS) has been developed for easier and faster assessment. OBJECTIVE: To determine if using aEDSS can achieve good inter-rater agreement and save time compared to pEDSS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 200 MS patients; EDSS was performed twice for each patient by two neurologists on the same day; one used the pEDSS, and the other used the aEDSS in a random order to test the inter-rater agreement regarding functional system scores and the final EDSS score and to detect the difference in the time needed for calculation between both methods. RESULTS: The new algorithmic approach achieved excellent agreement with the traditional method (Kappa > 0.81) with a shorter calculation time (16 ± 2.67 min for aEDSS vs 31 ± 4.3 min for pEDSS, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The new algorithmic approach could represent a suitable alternative to the traditional method, making EDSS calculation easier and faster. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9936401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99364012023-02-18 New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation Fouad, Amr M Abdel Naseer, Maged Farghaly, Marwa Hegazy, Mohamed I Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The traditional paper and pencil method for EDSS calculation (pEDSS) is the cornerstone of multiple sclerosis practice; however, it requires an expert for an accurate calculation, and it takes a lot of time to perform the function scores. A new algorithmic approach (aEDSS) has been developed for easier and faster assessment. OBJECTIVE: To determine if using aEDSS can achieve good inter-rater agreement and save time compared to pEDSS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 200 MS patients; EDSS was performed twice for each patient by two neurologists on the same day; one used the pEDSS, and the other used the aEDSS in a random order to test the inter-rater agreement regarding functional system scores and the final EDSS score and to detect the difference in the time needed for calculation between both methods. RESULTS: The new algorithmic approach achieved excellent agreement with the traditional method (Kappa > 0.81) with a shorter calculation time (16 ± 2.67 min for aEDSS vs 31 ± 4.3 min for pEDSS, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The new algorithmic approach could represent a suitable alternative to the traditional method, making EDSS calculation easier and faster. SAGE Publications 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9936401/ /pubmed/36816811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552173231155055 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Fouad, Amr M Abdel Naseer, Maged Farghaly, Marwa Hegazy, Mohamed I New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation |
title | New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation |
title_full | New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation |
title_fullStr | New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation |
title_full_unstemmed | New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation |
title_short | New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation |
title_sort | new algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552173231155055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fouadamrm newalgorithmicapproachforeasierandfasterextendeddisabilitystatusscalecalculation AT abdelnaseermaged newalgorithmicapproachforeasierandfasterextendeddisabilitystatusscalecalculation AT farghalymarwa newalgorithmicapproachforeasierandfasterextendeddisabilitystatusscalecalculation AT hegazymohamedi newalgorithmicapproachforeasierandfasterextendeddisabilitystatusscalecalculation |