Cargando…

New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation

BACKGROUND: The traditional paper and pencil method for EDSS calculation (pEDSS) is the cornerstone of multiple sclerosis practice; however, it requires an expert for an accurate calculation, and it takes a lot of time to perform the function scores. A new algorithmic approach (aEDSS) has been devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fouad, Amr M, Abdel Naseer, Maged, Farghaly, Marwa, Hegazy, Mohamed I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552173231155055
_version_ 1784890221983170560
author Fouad, Amr M
Abdel Naseer, Maged
Farghaly, Marwa
Hegazy, Mohamed I
author_facet Fouad, Amr M
Abdel Naseer, Maged
Farghaly, Marwa
Hegazy, Mohamed I
author_sort Fouad, Amr M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The traditional paper and pencil method for EDSS calculation (pEDSS) is the cornerstone of multiple sclerosis practice; however, it requires an expert for an accurate calculation, and it takes a lot of time to perform the function scores. A new algorithmic approach (aEDSS) has been developed for easier and faster assessment. OBJECTIVE: To determine if using aEDSS can achieve good inter-rater agreement and save time compared to pEDSS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 200 MS patients; EDSS was performed twice for each patient by two neurologists on the same day; one used the pEDSS, and the other used the aEDSS in a random order to test the inter-rater agreement regarding functional system scores and the final EDSS score and to detect the difference in the time needed for calculation between both methods. RESULTS: The new algorithmic approach achieved excellent agreement with the traditional method (Kappa > 0.81) with a shorter calculation time (16 ± 2.67 min for aEDSS vs 31 ± 4.3 min for pEDSS, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The new algorithmic approach could represent a suitable alternative to the traditional method, making EDSS calculation easier and faster.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9936401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99364012023-02-18 New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation Fouad, Amr M Abdel Naseer, Maged Farghaly, Marwa Hegazy, Mohamed I Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The traditional paper and pencil method for EDSS calculation (pEDSS) is the cornerstone of multiple sclerosis practice; however, it requires an expert for an accurate calculation, and it takes a lot of time to perform the function scores. A new algorithmic approach (aEDSS) has been developed for easier and faster assessment. OBJECTIVE: To determine if using aEDSS can achieve good inter-rater agreement and save time compared to pEDSS. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 200 MS patients; EDSS was performed twice for each patient by two neurologists on the same day; one used the pEDSS, and the other used the aEDSS in a random order to test the inter-rater agreement regarding functional system scores and the final EDSS score and to detect the difference in the time needed for calculation between both methods. RESULTS: The new algorithmic approach achieved excellent agreement with the traditional method (Kappa > 0.81) with a shorter calculation time (16 ± 2.67 min for aEDSS vs 31 ± 4.3 min for pEDSS, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The new algorithmic approach could represent a suitable alternative to the traditional method, making EDSS calculation easier and faster. SAGE Publications 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9936401/ /pubmed/36816811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552173231155055 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Fouad, Amr M
Abdel Naseer, Maged
Farghaly, Marwa
Hegazy, Mohamed I
New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation
title New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation
title_full New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation
title_fullStr New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation
title_full_unstemmed New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation
title_short New algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation
title_sort new algorithmic approach for easier and faster extended disability status scale calculation
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552173231155055
work_keys_str_mv AT fouadamrm newalgorithmicapproachforeasierandfasterextendeddisabilitystatusscalecalculation
AT abdelnaseermaged newalgorithmicapproachforeasierandfasterextendeddisabilitystatusscalecalculation
AT farghalymarwa newalgorithmicapproachforeasierandfasterextendeddisabilitystatusscalecalculation
AT hegazymohamedi newalgorithmicapproachforeasierandfasterextendeddisabilitystatusscalecalculation